Literature DB >> 16632835

The influence of tidal volume on the dynamic variables of fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients.

Cyril Charron1, Christine Fessenmeyer, Claudine Cosson, Jean-Xavier Mazoit, Jean-Louis Hebert, Dan Benhamou, Alain R Edouard.   

Abstract

Respiratory-related variabilities in stroke volume and arterial pulse pressure (Delta%Pp) are proposed to predict fluid responsiveness. We investigated the influence of tidal volume (Vt) and adrenergic tone on these variables in mechanically ventilated patients. Cyclic changes in aortic velocity-time integrals (Delta%VTI(Ao), echocardiography) and Delta%Pp (catheter) were measured simultaneously before and after intravascular volume expansion, and Vt was randomly varied below and above its basal value. Intravascular volume expansion was performed by hydroxyethyl starch (100 mL, 60 s). Receiver operating characteristic curves were generated for Delta%VTI(Ao), Delta%Pp and left ventricle cross-sectional end-diastolic area (echocardiography), considering the change in stroke volume after intravascular volume expansion (> or =15%) as the response criterion. Covariance analysis was used to test the influence of Vt on Delta%VTI(Ao) and Delta%Pp. Twenty-one patients were prospectively included; 9 patients (43%) were responders to intravascular volume expansion. Delta%VTI(Ao) and Delta%Pp were higher in responders compared with nonresponders. Predictive values of Delta%VTI(Ao) and Delta%Pp were similar (threshold: 20.4% and 10.0%, respectively) and higher than that of left ventricle cross-sectional end-diastolic area at the appropriate level of Vt. Delta%Pp was slightly correlated with norepinephrine dosage. Delta%Pp increased with the increase in the level of Vt both before and after intravascular volume expansion, contrasting with an unexpected stability of Delta%VTI(Ao). In conclusion, Delta%VTI(Ao) and Delta%Pp are good predictors of intravascular fluid responsiveness but the divergent evolution of these two variables when Vt was increased needs further explanation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16632835     DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000209015.21418.f4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  29 in total

Review 1.  Pulse pressure variation: where are we today?

Authors:  Maxime Cannesson; Mateo Aboy; Christoph K Hofer; Mohamed Rehman
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  The effects of vasoactive drugs on pulse pressure and stroke volume variation in postoperative ventilated patients.

Authors:  Mehrnaz Hadian; Donald A Severyn; Michael R Pinsky
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 3.425

3.  What is your strategy for fluid management?

Authors:  Young-Cheol Woo
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2012-04-23

Review 4.  Assessing dynamic fluid-responsiveness using transthoracic echocardiography in intensive care.

Authors:  N Desai; D Garry
Journal:  BJA Educ       Date:  2018-03-30

5.  Arterial Pressure Variation in Elective Noncardiac Surgery: Identifying Reference Distributions and Modifying Factors.

Authors:  Michael R Mathis; Samuel A Schechtman; Milo C Engoren; Amy M Shanks; Aleda Thompson; Sachin Kheterpal; Kevin K Tremper
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  Blood volume determination in obese and normal-weight gravidas: the hydroxyethyl starch method.

Authors:  Laura K Vricella; Judette M Louis; Edward Chien; Brian M Mercer
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 7.  Applied physiology at the bedside to drive resuscitation algorithms.

Authors:  Andre L Holder; Michael R Pinsky
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.628

Review 8.  Accuracy of stroke volume variation in predicting fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhongheng Zhang; Baolong Lu; Xiaoyan Sheng; Ni Jin
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2011-09-04       Impact factor: 2.078

9.  The influence of the airway driving pressure on pulsed pressure variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness.

Authors:  Laurent Muller; Guillaume Louart; Philippe-Jean Bousquet; Damien Candela; Lana Zoric; Jean-Emmanuel de La Coussaye; Samir Jaber; Jean-Yves Lefrant
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Respiratory variations in aortic blood flow predict fluid responsiveness in ventilated children.

Authors:  Philippe Durand; Laurent Chevret; Sandrine Essouri; Vincent Haas; Denis Devictor
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.