Literature DB >> 16632737

An algorithm for the diagnosis of focal liver masses using microbubble contrast-enhanced pulse-inversion sonography.

Stephanie R Wilson1, Peter N Burns.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to develop an algorithm for liver mass diagnosis using microbubble contrast-enhanced pulse-inversion sonography. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Ninety-six lesions in 92 patients were evaluated with DMP 115 (Definity)-enhanced pulse-inversion sonography, comprising 44 malignancies (29 hepatocellular carcinomas, 12 metastases, two peripheral cholangiocarcinomas, and one hepatic lymphoma) and 52 benign lesions (26 hemangiomas, 20 focal nodular hyperplasias, and six others). All had continuous low-mechanical-index imaging through the arterial and portal venous phase. A three-person blind review evaluated single images at baseline, early and peak arterial phases, and through the extended portal phases with a movie showing arterial phase wash-in. Reviewers assessed lesional vascularity and enhancement blindly but did not make a diagnosis. Combinations of answers were compared with independently determined final diagnoses to develop an algorithm for liver mass diagnosis.
RESULTS: Portal phase enhancement comprises the first step of the algorithm, with positive or sustained enhancement identifying 48 (92%) of 52 benign lesions and negative enhancement or washout present in 41 (93%) of 44 malignancies. Sustained portal phase enhancement with arterial phase peripheral nodularity and centripetal progression predicted 24 (92%) of 26 of the hemangiomas; diffuse arterial phase enhancement greater than the liver identified 19 (95%) of 20 of the focal nodular hyperplasias. With negative portal phase enhancement, arterial phase information was less effective at differentiating hepatocellular carcinoma (25 [86%] of 29 cases) from another hepatic malignancy (11 [73%] of 15 cases).
CONCLUSION: A simple diagnostic algorithm for interpretation of microbubble-enhanced sonography provides sensitive and accurate diagnosis of commonly encountered liver masses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16632737     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.04.1920

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  36 in total

1.  Computer-aided diagnosis for contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the liver.

Authors:  Katsutoshi Sugimoto; Junji Shiraishi; Fuminori Moriyasu; Kunio Doi
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2010-06-28

Review 2.  Benign liver lesions: grey-scale and contrast-enhanced ultrasound appearances.

Authors:  A E Obaro; S M Ryan
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2015-03-12

Review 3.  Microbubble ultrasound contrast agents: an update.

Authors:  Emilio Quaia
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-03-10       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Clinical uses of microbubbles in diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  David Cosgrove; Chris Harvey
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound detects perfusion defects in an ex vivo porcine liver model: a useful tool for the study of hepatic reperfusion.

Authors:  Ahmed Alzaraa; Dhya Al-Leswas; Wen Yuan Chung; Gianpiero Gravante; Morgan Bruno; Kevin West; Ashley Dennison; David Lloyd
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2013-06-29       Impact factor: 1.731

6.  Incidental focal solid liver lesions: diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and MR imaging.

Authors:  Michael Soussan; Christophe Aubé; Stéphane Bahrami; Jérôme Boursier; Dominique Charles Valla; Valérie Vilgrain
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Characterisation of focal liver lesions undetermined at grey-scale US: contrast-enhanced US versus 64-row MDCT and MRI with liver-specific contrast agent.

Authors:  T V Bartolotta; A Taibbi; M Midiri; L La Grutta; M De Maria; R Lagalla
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 3.469

8.  Prospective study of differential diagnosis of hepatic tumors by pattern-based classification of contrast-enhanced sonography.

Authors:  Kazushi Numata; Tetsuo Isozaki; Manabu Morimoto; Kazuya Sugimori; Reiko Kunisaki; Toshio Morizane; Katsuaki Tanaka
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-10-21       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Computer-aided diagnosis for the classification of focal liver lesions by use of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.

Authors:  Junji Shiraishi; Katsutoshi Sugimoto; Fuminori Moriyasu; Naohisa Kamiyama; Kunio Doi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 10.  [Surgical therapy of benign liver tumors].

Authors:  M Loss; C Zülke; A Obed; O Stöltzing; H J Schlitt
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 0.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.