Literature DB >> 16632422

Informed consent and sedation.

Jaime Sanz-Ortiz1.   

Abstract

The concept of autonomy was not included in the Hippocratic Oath. Nowadays the principle of respect for autonomy is an important right. The basic paradigm of autonomy in health-care, politics and other contexts is expressed as informed consent. In the palliative-care setting, there can be some difficulties in getting informed consent, especially at the end-of-life stage. Can it be good for the patient, always? Could there be some exceptions? At the time of agonizing pain, getting informed consent could become an additional burden for the patient. This present article attempts to shed light on this issue. In our experience, it is not necessary to obtain written consent for a patient who has already expressed his priorities in advance. We believe that this is a good stance for patients as well as doctors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16632422     DOI: 10.1007/s12094-006-0164-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol        ISSN: 1699-048X            Impact factor:   3.405


  4 in total

1.  [Moral setting in medical practice].

Authors:  J Sanz Ortiz
Journal:  Med Clin (Barc)       Date:  1999-05-22       Impact factor: 1.725

2.  Measuring patients' desire for autonomy: decision making and information-seeking preferences among medical patients.

Authors:  J Ende; L Kazis; A Ash; M A Moskowitz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1989 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Patient preferences for oral versus intravenous palliative chemotherapy.

Authors:  G Liu; E Franssen; M I Fitch; E Warner
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 4.  Patient participation in decision-making.

Authors:  E Guadagnoli; P Ward
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.634

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.