Literature DB >> 16632378

Mechanisms of evoked and induced responses in MEG/EEG.

Olivier David1, James M Kilner, Karl J Friston.   

Abstract

Cortical responses, recorded by electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography, can be characterized in the time domain, to study event-related potentials/fields, or in the time-frequency domain, to study oscillatory activity. In the literature, there is a common conception that evoked, induced, and on-going oscillations reflect different neuronal processes and mechanisms. In this work, we consider the relationship between the mechanisms generating neuronal transients and how they are expressed in terms of evoked and induced power. This relationship is addressed using a neuronally realistic model of interacting neuronal subpopulations. Neuronal transients were generated by changing neuronal input (a dynamic mechanism) or by perturbing the systems coupling parameters (a structural mechanism) to produce induced responses. By applying conventional time-frequency analyses, we show that, in contradistinction to common conceptions, induced and evoked oscillations are perhaps more related than previously reported. Specifically, structural mechanisms normally associated with induced responses can be expressed in evoked power. Conversely, dynamic mechanisms posited for evoked responses can induce responses, if there is variation in neuronal input. We conclude, it may be better to consider evoked responses as the results of mixed dynamic and structural effects. We introduce adjusted power to complement induced power. Adjusted power is unaffected by trial-to-trial variations in input and can be attributed to structural perturbations without ambiguity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16632378     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.02.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  93 in total

1.  Modeling habituation in rat EEG-evoked responses via a neural mass model with feedback.

Authors:  Srinivas Laxminarayan; Gilead Tadmor; Solomon G Diamond; Eric Miller; Maria Angela Franceschini; Dana H Brooks
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 2.086

2.  Atypical somatosensory-motor cortical response during vowel vocalization in spasmodic dysphonia.

Authors:  Sanaz Khosravani; Arash Mahnan; I-Ling Yeh; Peter J Watson; Yang Zhang; George Goding; Jürgen Konczak
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-03-23       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Neural correlates of tactile detection: a combined magnetoencephalography and biophysically based computational modeling study.

Authors:  Stephanie R Jones; Dominique L Pritchett; Steven M Stufflebeam; Matti Hämäläinen; Christopher I Moore
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-10-03       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Model driven EEG/fMRI fusion of brain oscillations.

Authors:  Pedro A Valdes-Sosa; Jose Miguel Sanchez-Bornot; Roberto Carlos Sotero; Yasser Iturria-Medina; Yasser Aleman-Gomez; Jorge Bosch-Bayard; Felix Carbonell; Tohru Ozaki
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 5.  Event-related EEG time-frequency analysis: an overview of measures and an analysis of early gamma band phase locking in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Brian J Roach; Daniel H Mathalon
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 9.306

6.  Dynamic causal models and autopoietic systems.

Authors:  Olivier David
Journal:  Biol Res       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 5.612

7.  Analysis of stimulus-related activity in rat auditory cortex using complex spectral coefficients.

Authors:  Bryan M Krause; Matthew I Banks
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  The neuromagnetic response to spoken sentences: co-modulation of theta band amplitude and phase.

Authors:  Mary F Howard; David Poeppel
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Oscillatory EEG activity induced by conditioning stimuli during fear conditioning reflects Salience and Valence of these stimuli more than Expectancy.

Authors:  J H Chien; L Colloca; A Korzeniewska; J J Cheng; C M Campbell; A E Hillis; F A Lenz
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2017-01-08       Impact factor: 3.590

10.  Studying network mechanisms using intracranial stimulation in epileptic patients.

Authors:  Olivier David; Julien Bastin; Stéphan Chabardès; Lorella Minotti; Philippe Kahane
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.