Literature DB >> 16632149

Evaluation of the three-time-point method for diagnosis of breast lesions in contrast-enhanced MR mammography.

Elke A M Hauth1, Christin Stockamp, Stefan Maderwald, Andreas Mühler, Rainer Kimmig, Horst Jaeger, Jörg Barkhausen, Michael Forsting.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the three-time-point (3TP) method for diagnosis of breast lesions detected on contrast-enhanced MR mammography.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR imaging was performed in 40 women with 120 suspected breast lesions in mammography and/or sonography. The contrast kinetics was converted by 3TP software on a pixel-by-pixel basis into color-coded images. Lesion diagnosis was made by analysis of color intensity and color hue. The 3TP results were compared with the results of the region-of-interest (ROI) method. In 16 patients, we were able to correlate the results with histopathological findings.
RESULTS: The 3TP method could successfully be performed in all MR mammographies. Forty (33%) lesions had a diameter of less than 5 mm, 56 (47%) lesions between 5 and 10 mm, and 24 (20%) lesions were greater than 1 cm. Of all 120 lesions, 65 (54%) showed heterogeneous contrast enhancement. In 117 (97%) of all 120 lesions the results of ROI and the automated 3TP method were considered equivalent. However, in three lesions the manual ROI differed from the 3TP method. After a second, repeated manual ROI placement, we were able to confirm equivalent results with the 3TP images as well.
CONCLUSIONS: The 3TP method automatically and reliably converts contrast kinetic information of the entire breast into a color-coded image. The 3TP method presents kinetic information of the entire dynamic series in an easy-to-interpret format and this automated method may allow to forego time-consuming and sometimes subjective manual ROI placements. This method displays the heterogeneity of the contrast enhancement pattern often observed in malignant lesions and makes it usable as diagnostic criterion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16632149     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2005.11.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Imaging        ISSN: 0899-7071            Impact factor:   1.605


  8 in total

1.  Evaluation of quantitative parametric analysis for characterization of breast lesions in contrast-enhanced MR mammography.

Authors:  E A M Hauth; H Jaeger; S Maderwald; C Stockamp; A Mühler; R Kimmig; M Forsting
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-07-29       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Fibroadenoma of the axillary accessory breast: diagnostic value of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Munehisa Sawa; Nobuyuki Kawai; Morio Sato; Taizo Takeuchi; Takeshi Tamaki; Shoji Oura
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2010-10-24       Impact factor: 2.374

3.  Dynamic breast MR imaging: is parametric mapping superior to image subtraction in lesion detection?

Authors:  Kathinka D Kurz; Hans-Jörg Wittsack; Reinhart Willers; Dirk Blondin; Ulrich Mödder; Andreas Saleh
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-06-16       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  [Quantitative parametric analysis of contrast-enhanced lesions in dynamic MR mammography].

Authors:  E A M Hauth; H Jaeger; S Maderwald; A Mühler; R Kimmig; M Forsting
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  2D/3D image fusion of X-ray mammograms with breast MRI: visualizing dynamic contrast enhancement in mammograms.

Authors:  Torsten Hopp; Pascal Baltzer; Matthias Dietzel; Werner A Kaiser; Nicole V Ruiter
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2011-06-05       Impact factor: 2.924

6.  Can signal enhancement ratio (SER) reduce the number of recommended biopsies without affecting cancer yield in occult MRI-detected lesions?

Authors:  Vignesh A Arasu; Ryan C-Y Chen; David N Newitt; C Belinda Chang; Hilda Tso; Nola M Hylton; Bonnie N Joe
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  Diagnostic accuracy of fused positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance mammography: initial results.

Authors:  T A Heusner; S Hahn; C Jonkmanns; S Kuemmel; F Otterbach; M E Hamami; A R Stahl; A Bockisch; M Forsting; G Antoch
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI parameters of breast lesions at 1.5 and 3.0 T: a pilot study.

Authors:  F D Pineda; M Medved; X Fan; M K Ivancevic; H Abe; A Shimauchi; G M Newstead; G S Karczmar
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 3.039

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.