BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a potential contributor to the muscle abnormalities and poor physical functioning of the dialysis population. METHODS: Thirty-three dialysis patients without DM (non-DM group) were compared with 25 dialysis patients with DM (DM group). Measures were made of cross-sectional area and composition of the leg muscles by using proton T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging; body composition by means of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; leg muscle strength by means of isokinetic knee extension; isometric dorsiflexor maximum voluntary contraction by means of force plate; physical activity by means of 3-dimensional accelerometry; and functional capacity by using various functional tests. RESULTS: The DM group was older, weaker, more atrophic, and had a greater amount of intramuscular fat compared with the non-DM group. However, when the overall analysis was adjusted for age and sex, there were no differences between the 2 groups with respect to muscle cross-sectional area, leg strength, or physical activity. To further account for sex and age differences, a paired analysis was performed after matching patients by age (within 5 years) and sex (N = 16/group). In the matched analysis, only intramuscular fat and leg adipose tissue were different between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: DM is associated with more fat within muscles of dialysis patients, but is unrelated to muscle size or strength. Demographic differences between the DM and non-DM groups on dialysis therapy likely are responsible for the general perception that patients with DM are more debilitated.
BACKGROUND:Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a potential contributor to the muscle abnormalities and poor physical functioning of the dialysis population. METHODS: Thirty-three dialysis patients without DM (non-DM group) were compared with 25 dialysis patients with DM (DM group). Measures were made of cross-sectional area and composition of the leg muscles by using proton T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging; body composition by means of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; leg muscle strength by means of isokinetic knee extension; isometric dorsiflexor maximum voluntary contraction by means of force plate; physical activity by means of 3-dimensional accelerometry; and functional capacity by using various functional tests. RESULTS: The DM group was older, weaker, more atrophic, and had a greater amount of intramuscular fat compared with the non-DM group. However, when the overall analysis was adjusted for age and sex, there were no differences between the 2 groups with respect to muscle cross-sectional area, leg strength, or physical activity. To further account for sex and age differences, a paired analysis was performed after matching patients by age (within 5 years) and sex (N = 16/group). In the matched analysis, only intramuscular fat and leg adipose tissue were different between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: DM is associated with more fat within muscles of dialysis patients, but is unrelated to muscle size or strength. Demographic differences between the DM and non-DM groups on dialysis therapy likely are responsible for the general perception that patients with DM are more debilitated.
Authors: Thomas W Buford; Stephen D Anton; Andrew R Judge; Emanuele Marzetti; Stephanie E Wohlgemuth; Christy S Carter; Christiaan Leeuwenburgh; Marco Pahor; Todd M Manini Journal: Ageing Res Rev Date: 2010-05-14 Impact factor: 10.895
Authors: Piyawan Kittiskulnam; Glenn M Chertow; Juan J Carrero; Cynthia Delgado; George A Kaysen; Kirsten L Johansen Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2017-03-17 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Lance E Davidson; David E Kelley; Stanley Heshka; John Thornton; F Xavier Pi-Sunyer; Lawrence Boxt; Ashok Balasubramanyam; Dympna Gallagher Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2014-06-19
Authors: Edson Alves de Lima Junior; Alex Shimura Yamashita; Gustavo Duarte Pimentel; Luís G O De Sousa; Ronaldo Vagner T Santos; Cinara Ludvig Gonçalves; Emilio Luiz Streck; Fábio Santos de Lira; Jose Cesar Rosa Neto Journal: J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle Date: 2016-02-15 Impact factor: 12.910
Authors: David Keane; Claire Gardiner; Elizabeth Lindley; Simon Lines; Graham Woodrow; Mark Wright Journal: Nutrients Date: 2016-11-04 Impact factor: 5.717