Literature DB >> 16631646

Two hundred forty minimally invasive mitral operations through right minithoracotomy.

Tayfun Aybek1, Selami Dogan, Petar S Risteski, Andreas Zierer, Thomas Wittlinger, Gerhard Wimmer-Greinecker, Anton Moritz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study reports of our 7-year experience with minimally invasive mitral valve operations using the transthoracic clamp technique, reviewing morbidity and mortality as well as echocardiographic follow-up results.
METHODS: Between 1997 and 2004, 241 patients (121 male; aged 56 +/- 14 years) underwent minimally invasive mitral valve surgery through right thoracotomy using the transthoracic clamp technique. Reconstructions were done in 199 patients, and 42 valves were replaced. Mean length of incision was 7.0 +/- 1.2 cm. Mean preoperative New York Heart Association functional class was 2.6 +/- 0.9.
RESULTS: Thirty-day mortality was 3.3% (n = 8). Operating, bypass, and cross-clamp times averaged 241 +/- 52, 142 +/- 40, and 84 +/- 26 minutes, respectively. Seven patients (2.9%) had conversion to sternotomy. Nine patients (3.7%) underwent reexploration for bleeding. Mean intensive care unit and hospital stay were 18 hours and 8.1 days, respectively. Mean follow-up was 30 +/- 18 months (range, 3 to 76). Echocardiographic follow-up documented persistently competent valve function in all but 6 patients who had grade III regurgitation. Five of them underwent mitral valve re-reconstruction and 1 underwent transplantation. At 76 months, freedom from nontrivial recurrent mitral regurgitation and reoperation were 92.3% and 96.2%, respectively. Actuarial survival at 76 months, including early mortality, was 90.7%. Thoracic wounds were free from infection in all patients.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the direct vision, transthoracic clamp technique for minimally invasive mitral valve surgery is reproducible with low mortality and morbidity rates. It results in excellent cosmesis and abolished the risk of thoracic wound infection. Results are comparable to midterm outcomes of conventional operations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16631646     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.12.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  10 in total

1.  Two Different Minimally Invasive Techniques for Female Patients with Atrial Septal Defects: Totally Thoracoscopic Technique and Right Anterolateral Thoracotomy Technique.

Authors:  Ming Xu; Shaoping Zhu; Xianguo Wang; Hua Huang; Jinping Zhao
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-05-25       Impact factor: 1.520

Review 2.  Minimally invasive mitral valve repair.

Authors:  Mateo Marin Cuartas; Piroze Minoo Davierwala
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-07-27

3.  Outcomes of video-assisted minimally invasive approach through right mini-thoracotomy for resection of benign cardiac masses; compared with median sternotomy.

Authors:  Sadanari Sawaki; Toshiaki Ito; Atsuo Maekawa; Satoshi Hoshino; Yasunari Hayashi; Junji Yanagisawa; Masayosi Tokoro; Takahiro Ozeki
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-08-02

4.  A minimally invasive approach is more cost-effective than a traditional sternotomy approach for mitral valve surgery.

Authors:  Alexander Iribarne; Rachel Easterwood; Mark J Russo; Y Claire Wang; Jonathan Yang; Kimberly N Hong; Craig R Smith; Michael Argenziano
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 5.  Anterolateral minithoracotomy versus median sternotomy for mitral valve disease: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chao Ding; Da-ming Jiang; Kai-yu Tao; Qun-jun Duan; Jie Li; Min-jian Kong; Zhong-hua Shen; Ai-qiang Dong
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.066

6.  Comparison of right anterolateral thorocotomy with standard median steronotomy for mitral valve replacement.

Authors:  Zamir Ahmad Shah; Abdual Gani Ahangar; Farooq Ahmad Ganie; Mohd Lateef Wani; Hafeezulla Lone; Nasir Ud Din Wani; Shadab Nabi Wani; Irteka Muzamil; Masaratul Gani
Journal:  Int Cardiovasc Res J       Date:  2013-03-15

7.  Minimally invasive versus sternotomy approach for mitral valve surgery: a propensity analysis.

Authors:  Alexander Iribarne; Mark J Russo; Rachel Easterwood; Kimberly N Hong; Jonathan Yang; Faisal H Cheema; Craig R Smith; Michael Argenziano
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.102

8.  Surgical Outcomes of Cardiac Myxoma: Right Minithoracotomy Approach versus Median Sternotomy Approach.

Authors:  Han Pil Lee; Won Chul Cho; Joon Bum Kim; Sung-Ho Jung; Suk Jung Choo; Cheol Hyun Chung; Jae Won Lee
Journal:  Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-10-05

9.  Initial Experience of Minimally Invasive Concomitant Aortic and Mitral Valve Replacement/Repair at a Tertiary Care Cardiac Centre of a Developing Country.

Authors:  Kashif Zia; Ali R Mangi; Hafeezullah Bughio; Khuzaima Tariq; Pervaiz A Chaudry; Musa Karim
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2019-09-20

10.  Eight-year experience with minimally invasive cardiothoracic surgery.

Authors:  Alexander Iribarne; Anna Karpenko; Mark J Russo; Faisal H Cheema; Faisal Cheema; Tianna Umann; Mehmet C Oz; Craig R Smith; Michael Argenziano
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.352

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.