Literature DB >> 33061184

Minimally invasive mitral valve repair.

Mateo Marin Cuartas1, Piroze Minoo Davierwala1.   

Abstract

Minimally invasive mitral valve (MV) repair is being increasingly performed over the last 2 decades due to the constantly growing patient demand, since it offers a shorter recovery, less restriction and faster return to normal physical activities, reduction in pain, and superior cosmetic results. However, such procedures have to be performed through small incisions which limit visualization and the freedom of movement of the surgeon, in contrast to conventional operations that are performed through a sternotomy. Therefore, special long surgical instruments are required, and visualization is usually enhanced with advanced port-access two-dimensional (2D) or three-dimensional (3D) thoracoscopic cameras. This makes performance of a minimally invasive MV repair more challenging for the surgeon and is thereby associated with a steep learning curve. Nonetheless, the vast majority of patients who require MV repair are usually good candidates for this less invasive technique, though adequate patient selection is of utmost importance for success. Concomitant cardiac procedures such as ablation surgery for atrial fibrillation or right-sided interventions such as tricuspid valve surgery, heart tumor resection, and atrial septal defect closure can easily be performed using this approach. Short- and long-term results after minimally invasive MV repair are excellent and comparable with those achieved through a sternotomy approach. There are few drawbacks associated with minimally invasive MV repair such as the high technical demands of working through a constrained space and development of complications associated with peripheral cannulation and seldom unilateral pulmonary edema. Nonetheless, high-volume centers have been able to achieve similar operating times, postoperative complication rates, and mid-/long-term outcomes to those obtained through conventional sternotomy. Up-to-date evidence is needed in order to improve recommendations supporting minimally invasive MV repair. Future innovations should concentrate on decreasing complexity and improving reproducibility of minimally invasive procedures in low-volume centers. © Indian Association of Cardiovascular-Thoracic Surgeons 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Minimally invasive mitral valve repair; Three-dimensional; Two-dimensional

Year:  2019        PMID: 33061184      PMCID: PMC7525482          DOI: 10.1007/s12055-019-00843-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0970-9134


  54 in total

1.  Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: "The Leipzig experience".

Authors:  Piroze M Davierwala; Joerg Seeburger; Bettina Pfannmueller; Jens Garbade; Martin Misfeld; Michael A Borger; Friedrich W Mohr
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-11

2.  Learning minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a cumulative sum sequential probability analysis of 3895 operations from a single high-volume center.

Authors:  David M Holzhey; Joerg Seeburger; Martin Misfeld; Michael A Borger; Friedrich W Mohr
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Mitral valve operation via Port Access versus median sternotomy.

Authors:  D D Glower; K P Landolfo; F Clements; N P Debruijn; M Stafford-Smith; P K Smith; F Duhaylongsod
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.191

4.  Minimally invasive right thoracotomy approach for mitral valve surgery in patients with previous sternotomy: a single institution experience with 173 patients.

Authors:  Michele Murzi; Antonio Miceli; Gioia Di Stefano; Alfredo G Cerillo; Pierandrea Farneti; Marco Solinas; Mattia Glauber
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery for Mitral Valve Infective Endocarditis.

Authors:  Sandra Folkmann; Joerg Seeburger; Jens Garbade; Uta Schon; Martin Misfeld; Friedrich W Mohr; Bettina Pfannmueller
Journal:  Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 6.  Minimally Invasive Heart Valve Surgery.

Authors:  Ismail Bouhout; Marie-Catherine Morgant; Denis Bouchard
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 5.223

7.  Minimally invasive approach provides at least equivalent results for surgical correction of mitral regurgitation: a propensity-matched comparison.

Authors:  Andrew B Goldstone; Pavan Atluri; Wilson Y Szeto; Alen Trubelja; Jessica L Howard; John W MacArthur; Craig Newcomb; Joseph P Donnelly; Dale M Kobrin; Mary A Sheridan; Christiana Powers; Robert C Gorman; Joseph H Gorman; Alberto Pochettino; Joseph E Bavaria; Michael A Acker; W Clark Hargrove; Y Joseph Woo
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  Comparison of early postoperative quality of life in minimally invasive versus conventional valve surgery.

Authors:  Tatsuya Yamada; Ryoichi Ochiai; Junzo Takeda; Hankei Shin; Ryohei Yozu
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.078

9.  Obesity should not deter a surgeon from selecting a minimally invasive approach for mitral valve surgery.

Authors:  Diana Reser; Simon Sündermann; Jürg Grünenfelder; Jacques Scherman; Burkhardt Seifert; Volkmar Falk; Stephan Jacobs
Journal:  Innovations (Phila)       Date:  2013 May-Jun

10.  Preoperative planning of left-sided valve surgery with 3D computed tomography reconstruction models: sternotomy or a minimally invasive approach?

Authors:  Samuel Heuts; Jos G Maessen; Peyman Sardari Nia
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2016-01-29
View more
  1 in total

1.  Quantitative biomechanical optimization of neochordal implantation location on mitral leaflets during valve repair.

Authors:  Pearly K Pandya; Robert J Wilkerson; Annabel M Imbrie-Moore; Yuanjia Zhu; Mateo Marin-Cuartas; Matthew H Park; Y Joseph Woo
Journal:  JTCVS Tech       Date:  2022-05-21
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.