Literature DB >> 16629134

Bioavailability of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from buried shoreline oil residues thirteen years after the Exxon Valdez oil spill: a multispecies assessment.

Jerry M Neff1, A Edward Bence, Keith R Parker, David S Page, John S Brown, Paul D Boehm.   

Abstract

Seven taxa of intertidal plants and animals were sampled at 17 shoreline sites in Prince William Sound ([PWS]; AK, USA), that were heavily oiled in 1989 by the Exxon Valdez oil spill (EVOS) to determine if polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) from buried oil in intertidal sediments are sufficiently bioavailable to intertidal prey organisms that they might pose a health risk to populations of birds and wildlife that forage on the shore. Buried residues of EVOS oil are present in upper and middle intertidal sediments at 16 sites. Lower intertidal (0 m) sediments contain little oil. Much of the PAH in lower intertidal sediments are from combustion sources. Mean tissue total PAH (TPAH) concentrations in intertidal clams, mussels, and worms from oiled sites range from 24 to 36 ng/g (parts per billion) dry weight; sea lettuce, whelks, hermit crabs, and intertidal fish contain lower concentrations. Concentrations of TPAH are similar or slightly lower in biota from unoiled reference sites. The low EVOS PAH concentrations detected in intertidal biota at oiled shoreline sites indicate that the PAH from EVOS oil buried in intertidal sediments at these sites have a low bioavailability to intertidal plants and animals. Individual sea otters or shorebirds that consumed a diet of intertidal clams and mussels exclusively from the 17 oiled shores in 2002 were at low risk of significant health problems. The low concentrations of EVOS PAH found in some intertidal organisms at some oiled shoreline sites in PWS do not represent a health risk to populations of marine birds and mammals that forage in the intertidal zone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16629134     DOI: 10.1897/05-339r.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem        ISSN: 0730-7268            Impact factor:   3.742


  6 in total

1.  A Quantitative Ecological Risk Assessment of the Toxicological Risks from Exxon Valdez Subsurface Oil Residues to Sea Otters at Northern Knight Island, Prince William Sound, Alaska.

Authors:  Mark A Harwell; John H Gentile; Charles B Johnson; David L Garshelis; Keith R Parker
Journal:  Hum Ecol Risk Assess       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 5.190

2.  Quantitative Assessment of Current Risks to Harlequin Ducks in Prince William Sound, Alaska, from the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill.

Authors:  Mark A Harwell; John H Gentile; Keith R Parker; Stephen M Murphy; Robert H Day; A Edward Bence; Jerry M Neff; John A Wiens
Journal:  Hum Ecol Risk Assess       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 5.190

3.  Quantifying population-level risks using an individual-based model: sea otters, Harlequin Ducks, and the Exxon Valdez oil spill.

Authors:  Mark A Harwell; John H Gentile; Keith R Parker
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 2.992

4.  Oil biodegradation and bioremediation: a tale of the two worst spills in U.S. history.

Authors:  Ronald M Atlas; Terry C Hazen
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Bioremediation of marine oil spills: when and when not--the Exxon Valdez experience.

Authors:  Ronald Atlas; James Bragg
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.813

6.  Spilled Oils: Static Mixtures or Dynamic Weathering and Bioavailability?

Authors:  Mark G Carls; Marie L Larsen; Larry G Holland
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.