Literature DB >> 16627353

Action-feature integration blinds to feature-overlapping perceptual events: evidence from manual and vocal actions.

Bernhard Hommel1, Jochen Müsseler.   

Abstract

Previous studies showed that the identification of a left- or right-pointing arrowhead is impaired when it appears while planning and executing a spatially compatible left or right keypress (Müsseler & Hommel, 1997a). We attribute this effect to stimulus processing and action control operating on the same feature codes so that, once a code is integrated in an action plan, it is less available for perceptual processing. In three pairs of experiments we tested the generality of this account by using stimulus-response combinations other than arrows and manual keypresses. Planning manual left-right keypressing actions impaired the identification of spatially corresponding arrows but not of words with congruent meaning. On the contrary, planning to say "left" or "right" impaired the identification of corresponding spatial words but not of congruent arrows. Thus, as the feature-integration approach suggests, stimulus identification is impaired only with overlap of perceptual or perceptually derived stimulus and response features while mere semantic congruence is insufficient.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16627353     DOI: 10.1080/02724980443000836

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  17 in total

1.  Actions blind to conceptually overlapping stimuli.

Authors:  Wilfried Kunde; Peter Wühr
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-11-08

2.  Intentional control of attention: action planning primes action-related stimulus dimensions.

Authors:  Sabrina Fagioli; Bernhard Hommel; Ricarda Ines Schubotz
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-11-30

3.  Effector identity and orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility in blindness to response-compatible stimuli.

Authors:  Akio Nishimura; Kazuhiko Yokosawa
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-02-12

4.  Impact of planned movement direction on judgments of visual locations.

Authors:  Wladimir Kirsch; Wilfried Kunde
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-08-22

5.  Holding a manual response sequence in memory can disrupt vocal responses that share semantic features with the manual response.

Authors:  Lisa Renee Fournier; Matthew D Wiediger; Ryan McMeans; Paul S Mattson; Joy Kirkwood; Theibot Herzog
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-09-02

6.  The structure of affective action representations: temporal binding of affective response codes.

Authors:  Andreas B Eder; Jochen Müsseler; Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-03-27

7.  The role of cue-response mapping in motorvisual impairment and facilitation: evidence for different roles of action planning and action control in motorvisual dual-task priming.

Authors:  Roland Thomaschke; Brian Hopkins; R Christopher Miall
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 8.  Action control according to TEC (theory of event coding).

Authors:  Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-04-01

9.  Memory Meets Control in Hippocampal and Striatal Binding of Stimuli, Responses, and Attentional Control States.

Authors:  Jiefeng Jiang; Nadia M Brashier; Tobias Egner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Investigating ideomotor cognition with motorvisual priming paradigms: key findings, methodological challenges, and future directions.

Authors:  Roland Thomaschke
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-11-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.