Literature DB >> 16627276

Evidence for adaptive male mate choice in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster.

Phillip G Byrne1, William R Rice.   

Abstract

Theory predicts that males will benefit when they bias their mating effort towards females of higher reproductive potential, and that this discrimination will increase as males become more resource limited. We conducted a series of experiments to test these predictions in a laboratory population of the fruitfly, Drosophila melanogaster. In this species, courtship and copulation have significant costs to males, and females vary greatly in fecundity, which is positively associated with body size. When given a simultaneous choice between small and large virgin females, males preferentially mated with larger, more fecund, females. Moreover, after males had recently mated they showed a stronger preference for larger females. These results suggest that male D. melanogaster adaptively allocate their mating effort in response to variation in female quality and provide some of the first support for the theoretical prediction that male stringency in mate choice increases as resources become more limiting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16627276      PMCID: PMC1560241          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3372

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  17 in total

1.  Strategic male mating effort and cryptic male choice in a scorpionfly.

Authors:  L Engqvist; K P Sauer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  The influence of male and female body size on copulation duration and fecundity in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  A Lefranc; J Bundgaard
Journal:  Hereditas       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.271

3.  Increased sexual activity reduces male immune function in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  K A McKean; L Nunney
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-06-19       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Why is mutual mate choice not the norm? Operational sex ratios, sex roles and the evolution of sexually dimorphic and monomorphic signalling.

Authors:  Hanna Kokko; Rufus A Johnstone
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-03-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence.

Authors:  R Bonduriansky
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2001-08

Review 6.  The evolution of mate choice and mating biases.

Authors:  Hanna Kokko; Robert Brooks; Michael D Jennions; Josephine Morley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Sperm transfer, storage, displacement, and utilization in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  G LEFEVRE; U B JONSSON
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1962-12       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Optimal copula duration in yellow dung flies: effects of female size and egg content.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.844

9.  Indiscriminate females and choosy males: within- and between-species variation in Drosophila.

Authors:  Patricia Adair Gowaty; Rebecca Steinichen; Wyatt W Anderson
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Costs influence male mate choice in a freshwater fish.

Authors:  Bob B M Wong; Michael D Jennions
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  47 in total

Review 1.  Gene duplication, tissue-specific gene expression and sexual conflict in stalk-eyed flies (Diopsidae).

Authors:  Richard H Baker; Apurva Narechania; Philip M Johns; Gerald S Wilkinson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Experimental evidence that female ornamentation increases the acquisition of sperm and signals fecundity.

Authors:  Charlie K Cornwallis; Tim R Birkhead
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Evolution of male and female choice in polyandrous systems.

Authors:  Mikael Puurtinen; Lutz Fromhage
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Male cognitive performance declines in the absence of sexual selection.

Authors:  Brian Hollis; Tadeusz J Kawecki
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Diet influences host-microbiota associations in Drosophila.

Authors:  Benjamin Obadia; Erin S Keebaugh; Ryuichi Yamada; William B Ludington; William W Ja
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Remating in Drosophila melanogaster: are indirect benefits condition dependent?

Authors:  Tristan A F Long; Alison Pischedda; William R Rice
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Reappraising sexual coevolution and the sex roles.

Authors:  Russell Bonduriansky
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 8.029

8.  A cost of sexual attractiveness to high-fitness females.

Authors:  Tristan A F Long; Alison Pischedda; Andrew D Stewart; William R Rice
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  Body size preferences in the pot-bellied seahorse Hippocampus abdominalis: choosy males and indiscriminate females.

Authors:  Beat Mattle; Anthony B Wilson
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 2.980

10.  Cost of reproduction in male medflies: the primacy of sexual courting in extreme longevity reduction.

Authors:  Nikos T Papadopoulos; Pablo Liedo; Hans-Georg Müller; Jane-Ling Wang; Freerk Molleman; James R Carey
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  2009-11-14       Impact factor: 2.354

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.