Literature DB >> 16627032

Acceptability and satisfaction using Quick Start with the contraceptive vaginal ring versus an oral contraceptive.

Julie E Schafer1, Lauren M Osborne, Anne R Davis, Carolyn Westhoff.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many women discontinue their use of hormonal contraception, and even those who continue so may have difficulty using oral contraceptive pills consistently. New delivery systems, including the vaginal ring, may be easier to use, but user acceptability and satisfaction with these new methods may be affected by women's experience with their bodies.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data for this study were collected as part of a randomized clinical trial on 201 women comparing immediate start of vaginal ring use with immediate start of low-dose oral contraceptive use. We assessed user satisfaction and method continuation 3 months after ring or pill initiation.
RESULTS: At 3 months, 174 of 201 subjects (87%) had follow-up interviews. Among the 174 study participants with follow-up data, 61% of ring subjects and 34% of pill subjects were very satisfied with their methods (p=.003). For posttrial contraception, 79% of ring subjects chose to continue with the ring whereas 59% of pill subjects chose to continue with the pill (p<.001). Women who reported greater comfort in touching their genitals, greater frequency of masturbation, more comfort with intercourse and past use of vaginal contraceptives and products were not more likely than others to be satisfied with the ring or to continue using it for birth control.
CONCLUSION: Women who were allocated to vaginal ring use, regardless of their baseline characteristics or behavior, were likely to be highly satisfied with the method and to continue its use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16627032     DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2005.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  16 in total

Review 1.  Studying the use of oral contraception: a review of measurement approaches.

Authors:  Kelli Stidham Hall; Katharine O'Connell White; Nancy Reame; Carolyn Westhoff
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  When to suggest this OC alternative.

Authors:  Kate Rowland; Sarah-Anne Schumann
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 0.493

3.  Adolescent experiences with the vaginal ring.

Authors:  Laura B Epstein; Karen Sokal-Gutierrez; Susan L Ivey; Tina Raine; Colette Auerswald
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2008-03-10       Impact factor: 5.012

4.  A Qualitative Systematic Review of Women's Experiences Using Contraceptive Vaginal Rings: Implications for New Technologies.

Authors:  Sara E Vargas; Miriam M Midoun; Melissa Guillen; Melissa L Getz; Kristen Underhill; Caroline Kuo; Kate M Guthrie
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2019-05-20

Review 5.  Immediate start of hormonal contraceptives for contraception.

Authors:  Laureen M Lopez; Sara J Newmann; David A Grimes; Kavita Nanda; Kenneth F Schulz
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-12-12

6.  Contraceptive sex acceptability: a commentary, synopsis and agenda for future research.

Authors:  Jenny A Higgins; Anne R Davis
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 3.375

7.  Hormonal contraceptive method choice among young, low-income women: how important is the provider?

Authors:  Cynthia C Harper; Beth A Brown; Anne Foster-Rosales; Tina R Raine
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2010-09-15

8.  Bleeding profile associated with 1-year use of the segesterone acetate/ethinyl estradiol contraceptive vaginal system: pooled analysis from Phase 3 trials.

Authors:  Carolina Sales Vieira; Ian S Fraser; Marlena G Plagianos; Anne E Burke; Carolyn L Westhoff; Jeffrey Jensen; Vivian Brache; Luis Bahamondes; Ruth Merkatz; Regine Sitruk-Ware; Diana L Blithe
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 3.375

9.  Acceptability of the Nestorone®/ethinyl estradiol contraceptive vaginal ring: development of a model; implications for introduction.

Authors:  Ruth B Merkatz; Marlena Plagianos; Elena Hoskin; Michael Cooney; Paul C Hewett; Barbara S Mensch
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 3.375

10.  Performance of a checklist to exclude pregnancy at the time of contraceptive initiation among women with a negative urine pregnancy test.

Authors:  Jaspur Min; Christina Buckel; Gina M Secura; Jeffrey F Peipert; Tessa Madden
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 3.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.