Literature DB >> 16624241

Strategies for comparing gene expression profiles from different microarray platforms: application to a case-control experiment.

Marco Severgnini1, Silvio Bicciato, Eleonora Mangano, Francesca Scarlatti, Alessandra Mezzelani, Michela Mattioli, Riccardo Ghidoni, Clelia Peano, Raoul Bonnal, Federica Viti, Luciano Milanesi, Gianluca De Bellis, Cristina Battaglia.   

Abstract

Meta-analysis of microarray data is increasingly important, considering both the availability of multiple platforms using disparate technologies and the accumulation in public repositories of data sets from different laboratories. We addressed the issue of comparing gene expression profiles from two microarray platforms by devising a standardized investigative strategy. We tested this procedure by studying MDA-MB-231 cells, which undergo apoptosis on treatment with resveratrol. Gene expression profiles were obtained using high-density, short-oligonucleotide, single-color microarray platforms: GeneChip (Affymetrix) and CodeLink (Amersham). Interplatform analyses were carried out on 8414 common transcripts represented on both platforms, as identified by LocusLink ID, representing 70.8% and 88.6% of annotated GeneChip and CodeLink features, respectively. We identified 105 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) on CodeLink and 42 DEGs on GeneChip. Among them, only 9 DEGs were commonly identified by both platforms. Multiple analyses (BLAST alignment of probes with target sequences, gene ontology, literature mining, and quantitative real-time PCR) permitted us to investigate the factors contributing to the generation of platform-dependent results in single-color microarray experiments. An effective approach to cross-platform comparison involves microarrays of similar technologies, samples prepared by identical methods, and a standardized battery of bioinformatic and statistical analyses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16624241     DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2006.03.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Biochem        ISSN: 0003-2697            Impact factor:   3.365


  18 in total

Review 1.  Meta-analysis of microarray results: challenges, opportunities, and recommendations for standardization.

Authors:  Patrick Cahan; Felicia Rovegno; Denise Mooney; John C Newman; Georges St Laurent; Timothy A McCaffrey
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2007-07-03       Impact factor: 3.688

Review 2.  Using differential gene expression to study Entamoeba histolytica pathogenesis.

Authors:  Carol A Gilchrist; William A Petri
Journal:  Trends Parasitol       Date:  2009-02-13

Review 3.  Review of the literature examining the correlation among DNA microarray technologies.

Authors:  Carole L Yauk; M Lynn Berndt
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.216

4.  Bimodal gene expression patterns in breast cancer.

Authors:  Marina Bessarabova; Eugene Kirillov; Weiwei Shi; Andrej Bugrim; Yuri Nikolsky; Tatiana Nikolskaya
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 5.  Practical application of toxicogenomics for profiling toxicant-induced biological perturbations.

Authors:  Naoki Kiyosawa; Sunao Manabe; Takashi Yamoto; Atsushi Sanbuissho
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  A gene expression signature of RAS pathway dependence predicts response to PI3K and RAS pathway inhibitors and expands the population of RAS pathway activated tumors.

Authors:  Andrey Loboda; Michael Nebozhyn; Rich Klinghoffer; Jason Frazier; Michael Chastain; William Arthur; Brian Roberts; Theresa Zhang; Melissa Chenard; Brian Haines; Jannik Andersen; Kumiko Nagashima; Cloud Paweletz; Bethany Lynch; Igor Feldman; Hongyue Dai; Pearl Huang; James Watters
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 3.063

7.  Analysis of differentially expressed genes in colorectal adenocarcinoma with versus without metastasis by three-dimensional oligonucleotide microarray.

Authors:  Rita M A M Moura Franco; Marcelo M Linhares; Suzana S Lustosa; Ismael D G C Silva; Naiara C N Souza; Delcio Matos
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2013-12-15

8.  Intra- and inter-individual variance of gene expression in clinical studies.

Authors:  Wei-Chung Cheng; Wun-Yi Shu; Chia-Yang Li; Min-Lung Tsai; Cheng-Wei Chang; Chaang-Ray Chen; Hung-Tsu Cheng; Tzu-Hao Wang; Ian C Hsu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Novel insights into adipogenesis from omics data.

Authors:  Andreas Prokesch; Hubert Hackl; Robab Hakim-Weber; Stefan R Bornstein; Zlatko Trajanoski
Journal:  Curr Med Chem       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Towards large-scale sample annotation in gene expression repositories.

Authors:  Erik Pitzer; Ronilda Lacson; Christian Hinske; Jihoon Kim; Pedro Af Galante; Lucila Ohno-Machado
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.