Literature DB >> 16623688

The anchoring-and-adjustment heuristic: why the adjustments are insufficient.

Nicholas Epley1, Thomas Gilovich.   

Abstract

One way to make judgments under uncertainty is to anchor on information that comes to mind and adjust until a plausible estimate is reached. This anchoring-and-adjustment heuristic is assumed to underlie many intuitive judgments, and insufficient adjustment is commonly invoked to explain judgmental biases. However, despite extensive research on anchoring effects, evidence for adjustment-based anchoring biases has only recently been provided, and the causes of insufficient adjustment remain unclear. This research was designed to identify the origins of insufficient adjustment. The results of two sets of experiments indicate that adjustments from self-generated anchor values tend to be insufficient because they terminate once a plausible value is reached (Studies 1a and 1b) unless one is able and willing to search for a more accurate estimate (Studies 2a-2c).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16623688     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01704.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  52 in total

1.  Ordered questions bias eyewitnesses and jurors.

Authors:  Robert B Michael; Maryanne Garry
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-04

2.  Exploring the knowledge behind predictions in everyday cognition: an iterated learning study.

Authors:  Rachel G Stephens; John C Dunn; Li-Lin Rao; Shu Li
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-10

3.  Anchor effects in decision making can be reduced by the interaction between goal monitoring and the level of the decision maker's executive functions.

Authors:  Johannes Schiebener; Elisa Wegmann; Mirko Pawlikowski; Matthias Brand
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2012-08-23

4.  Test Framing Generates a Stability Bias for Predictions of Learning by Causing People to Discount their Learning Beliefs.

Authors:  Robert Ariel; Jarrod C Hines; Christopher Hertzog
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 3.059

Review 5.  The anchoring bias reflects rational use of cognitive resources.

Authors:  Falk Lieder; Thomas L Griffiths; Quentin J M Huys; Noah D Goodman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-02

6.  Empirical evidence for resource-rational anchoring and adjustment.

Authors:  Falk Lieder; Thomas L Griffiths; Quentin J M Huys; Noah D Goodman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-04

7.  Socially triggered negative affect impairs performance in simple cognitive tasks.

Authors:  Svenja Böttcher; Gesine Dreisbach
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-02-20

8.  Distress among women receiving uninformative BRCA1/2 results: 12-month outcomes.

Authors:  Suzanne C O'Neill; Christine Rini; Rachel E Goldsmith; Heiddis Valdimarsdottir; Lawrence H Cohen; Marc D Schwartz
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 9.  Anchoring-and-adjustment bias in communication of disease risk.

Authors:  Ibrahim Senay; Kimberly A Kaphingst
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 2.583

10.  Parental explicit heuristics in decision-making for children with life-threatening illnesses.

Authors:  Chris B Renjilian; James W Womer; Karen W Carroll; Tammy I Kang; Chris Feudtner
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 7.124

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.