Literature DB >> 16622653

Neutropenic event risk and impaired chemotherapy delivery in six European audits of breast cancer treatment.

Matthias Schwenkglenks1, Christian Jackisch, Manuel Constenla, Joseph N Kerger, Robert Paridaens, Leo Auerbach, André Bosly, Ruth Pettengell, Thomas D Szucs, Robert Leonard.   

Abstract

GOALS OF WORK: The aims of this study were to assess chemotherapy treatment characteristics, neutropenic event (NE) occurrence and related risk factors in breast cancer patients in Western Europe.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six retrospective audits of breast cancer chemotherapy were combined into a dataset of 2,860 individuals. NEs were defined as neutropenia-related hospitalisation, dose reduction > or = 15% or dose delay > or = 7 days. Summation dose intensity (SDI) was calculated to compare different types of chemotherapy regimens on a single scale. Risk factors of NE occurrence and of low relative dose intensity (RDI) < or = 85% were identified by multiple logistic regression. MAIN
RESULTS: Patient populations were comparable between audits. Until 1998, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil regimens were most frequently used, but thereafter, anthracycline-based regimens were most common. NEs occurred in 20% of the patients and low RDI in 16%. NE occurrence predicted low RDI and was associated with higher age, bigger body surface area, lower body mass index, regimen type, more chemotherapy cycles planned, normal to high SDI, concomitant radiotherapy and year of treatment. First cycle NE occurrence predicted NEs from cycle 2 onwards. A risk score using age, SDI, number of planned chemotherapy cycles and concomitant radiotherapy differentiated patients with increasing NE risk (9-37%). An alternative score version not using concomitant radiotherapy performed moderately less well.
CONCLUSIONS: NEs occurred frequently in this combined dataset and they affected treatment delivery. Identifying patients at high NE risk enables targeted prophylaxis and may avoid dose limitations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16622653     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-006-0034-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  21 in total

1.  2000 update of recommendations for the use of hematopoietic colony-stimulating factors: evidence-based, clinical practice guidelines. American Society of Clinical Oncology Growth Factors Expert Panel.

Authors:  H Ozer; J O Armitage; C L Bennett; J Crawford; G D Demetri; P A Pizzo; C A Schiffer; T J Smith; G Somlo; J C Wade; J L Wade; R J Winn; A J Wozniak; M R Somerfield
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-10-15       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  ESMO recommendations for the application of haematopoietic growth factors (hGFs).

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 3.  Colony-stimulating factors for the management of neutropenia in cancer patients.

Authors:  David C Dale
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  A single scale for comparing dose-intensity of all chemotherapy regimens in breast cancer: summation dose-intensity.

Authors:  W Hryniuk; E Frei; F A Wright
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  The impact of chemotherapy dose density and dose intensity on breast cancer outcome: what have we learned?

Authors:  M J Piccart; L Biganzoli; A Di Leo
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 6.  Chemotherapy dose reduction and delay in clinical practice. evaluating the risk to patient outcome in adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  J Chang
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 9.162

7.  Adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in node-positive breast cancer: the results of 20 years of follow-up.

Authors:  G Bonadonna; P Valagussa; A Moliterni; M Zambetti; C Brambilla
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-04-06       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 8.  Risk assessment in oncology clinical practice. From risk factors to risk models.

Authors:  Gary H Lyman
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.990

9.  Dose-dense anthracycline-based chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Georgiana K Ellis; Robert B Livingston; Julie R Gralow; Stephanie J Green; Tove Thompson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-09-01       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Incidence and predictors of low dose-intensity in adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy: a nationwide study of community practices.

Authors:  Gary H Lyman; David C Dale; Jeffrey Crawford
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  23 in total

Review 1.  Febrile neutropenia in hematologic malignancies.

Authors:  Michael K Keng; Mikkael A Sekeres
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.952

2.  Adherence to Treatment Guidelines in Breast Cancer Care - a Retrospective Analysis of the 'Organgruppe Mamma der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie'

Authors:  Christian Jackisch; Michael Untch; Dimitrios Chatsiproios; Christiane Lamparter; Friedrich Overkamp; Werner Lichtenegger; Wolfgang Rönsberg; Christoph Thomssen; Gunter von Minckwitz; Ute-Susann Albert
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2008-04-25       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Costs associated with febrile neutropenia in the US.

Authors:  Shannon L Michels; Rich L Barron; Matthew W Reynolds; Karen Smoyer Tomic; Jingbo Yu; Gary H Lyman
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Predicting risk of chemotherapy-induced severe neutropenia: A pooled analysis in individual patients data with advanced lung cancer.

Authors:  Xiaowen Cao; Apar Kishor Ganti; Thomas Stinchcombe; Melisa L Wong; James C Ho; Chen Shen; Yingzhou Liu; Jeffery Crawford; Herbert Pang; Xiaofei Wang
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 5.705

5.  Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modelling of the novel human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor derivative Maxy-G34 and pegfilgrastim in rats.

Authors:  M Scholz; C Engel; D Apt; S L Sankar; E Goldstein; M Loeffler
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 6.831

6.  Multivariate analysis of febrile neutropenia occurrence in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma: data from the INC-EU Prospective Observational European Neutropenia Study.

Authors:  Ruth Pettengell; André Bosly; Thomas D Szucs; Christian Jackisch; Robert Leonard; Robert Paridaens; Manuel Constenla; Matthias Schwenkglenks
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 6.998

7.  Neutropenia occurrence and predictors of reduced chemotherapy delivery: results from the INC-EU prospective observational European neutropenia study.

Authors:  Ruth Pettengell; Matthias Schwenkglenks; Robert Leonard; André Bosly; Robert Paridaens; Manuel Constenla; Thomas D Szucs; Christian Jackisch
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Real-world impact of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor on febrile neutropenia.

Authors:  A K Altwairgi; W M Hopman; M Mates
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.677

9.  A pharmacokinetic model of filgrastim and pegfilgrastim application in normal mice and those with cyclophosphamide-induced granulocytopaenia.

Authors:  M Scholz; M Ackermann; C Engel; F Emmrich; M Loeffler; M Kamprad
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2009-08-17       Impact factor: 6.831

10.  Effectiveness of cytopenia prophylaxis for different filgrastim and pegfilgrastim schedules in a chemotherapy mouse model.

Authors:  Markus Scholz; Manuela Ackermann; Frank Emmrich; Markus Loeffler; Manja Kamprad
Journal:  Biologics       Date:  2009-07-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.