Literature DB >> 16621334

Variation of bar-press duration: where do new responses come from?

Seth Roberts1, Afshin Gharib.   

Abstract

Instrumental learning involves both variation and selection: variation of what the animal does, and selection by reward from among the variation. Four experiments with rats suggested a rule about how variation is controlled by recent events. Experiment 1 used the peak procedure. Measurements of bar-press durations showed a sharp increase in mean duration after the time that food was sometimes given. The increase was triggered by the omission of expected food. Our first explanation of the increase was that it was a frustration effect. Experiment 2 tested this explanation with a procedure in which the first response of a trial usually produced food, ending the trial. In Experiment 2, unlike Experiment 1, omission of expected food did not produce a large increase in bar-press duration, which cast doubt on the frustration explanation. Experiments 3 and 4 tested an alternative explanation: a decrease in expectation of reward increases variation. Both used two signals associated with different probabilities of reward. Bar presses were more variable in duration during the signal with the lower probability of reward, supporting this alternative. These experiments show how variation can be studied with ordinary equipment and responses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16621334     DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2006.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  8 in total

1.  Longer operant lever-press duration requirements induce fewer but longer response bouts in rats.

Authors:  Ryan J Brackney; Raul Garcia; Federico Sanabria
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Interval timing under a behavioral microscope: Dissociating motivational and timing processes in fixed-interval performance.

Authors:  Carter W Daniels; Federico Sanabria
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Midsession shifts in reward probability and the control of behavioral variability.

Authors:  W David Stahlman; Kenneth J Leising
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  Temporal structure of motor variability is dynamically regulated and predicts motor learning ability.

Authors:  Howard G Wu; Yohsuke R Miyamoto; Luis Nicolas Gonzalez Castro; Bence P Ölveczky; Maurice A Smith
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-12       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Interval timing, temporal averaging, and cue integration.

Authors:  Benjamin J De Corte; Matthew S Matell
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2016-04

Review 6.  Towards a scientific concept of free will as a biological trait: spontaneous actions and decision-making in invertebrates.

Authors:  Björn Brembs
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Individual differences in gambling proneness among rats and common marmosets: an automated choice task.

Authors:  Francesca Zoratto; Emma Sinclair; Arianna Manciocco; Augusto Vitale; Giovanni Laviola; Walter Adriani
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Recalibrating timing behavior via expected covariance between temporal cues.

Authors:  Benjamin J De Corte; Rebecca R Della Valle; Matthew S Matell
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 8.140

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.