Literature DB >> 16619676

Prevention of percutaneous electrode migration in spinal cord stimulation by a modification of the standard implantation technique.

Violette M Renard1, Richard B North.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Percutaneous spinal cord stimulation (SCS) electrodes are prone to migration even after scar tissue encapsulation. The authors devised a simple technique to eliminate longitudinal migration.
METHODS: In 99 patients who received implanted percutaneous electrodes, less than 0.1 cm3 of silicone elastomer adhesive was injected between the anchoring sleeve and the electrode. As a result, no patient required revision surgery due to longitudinal electrode migration over a mean follow-up period of 20.2 +/- 12.3 months (range 1.8-39.7 months). Postimplant SCS-related surgical procedures were required in 15 patients (15%) for the following indications: infection in three patients, expanded area of pain in four patients, lateral migration after the sutures eroded through the supraspinous ligament in one patient, postural changes in stimulation in one patient, receiver-site pain in two patients, technical failure in three patients, and inadequate pain relief in one patient.
CONCLUSIONS: With modification of the standard technique for implantation of percutaneous SCS electrodes, no longitudinal migration of electrodes was noted in this series of 99 patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16619676     DOI: 10.3171/spi.2006.4.4.300

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  6 in total

Review 1.  Recovery of control of posture and locomotion after a spinal cord injury: solutions staring us in the face.

Authors:  Andy J Fong; Roland R Roy; Ronaldo M Ichiyama; Igor Lavrov; Grégoire Courtine; Yury Gerasimenko; Y C Tai; Joel Burdick; V Reggie Edgerton
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.453

2.  A Materials Roadmap to Functional Neural Interface Design.

Authors:  Steven M Wellman; James R Eles; Kip A Ludwig; John P Seymour; Nicholas J Michelson; William E McFadden; Alberto L Vazquez; Takashi D Y Kozai
Journal:  Adv Funct Mater       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 18.808

3.  Percutaneous adjustment method for transversely migrated spinal cord stimulation leads: a technical report.

Authors:  Sang Yoon Jeon; Jae Young Ji; Sie Hyeon Yoo; Jin Young Chon; Sung Hoon Jung; Ho Sik Moon
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2015-06-21       Impact factor: 2.078

4.  Neuromodulation in the treatment of postoperative epidural fibrosis: comparison of the extent of epidural fibrosis and the effect of stimulation.

Authors:  V Masopust; J Holubová; P Skalický; R Rokyta; J Fricová; J Lacman; D Netuka; J Patríková; K Janoušková
Journal:  Physiol Res       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 1.881

5.  A Retrospective Case Series of a Novel Spinal Cord Stimulator Trial Technique with Less Displacement and Migration of the Trial Leads.

Authors:  N Shaparin; K Gritsenko; P Agrawal; S Kim; S Wahezi; A Gitkind; J Hascalovici; A Vydyanathan; J Bernstein; A Dizdarevic; N Mehta; A Kaufman
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2019-06-09       Impact factor: 3.037

6.  Evaluation of intradural stimulation efficiency and selectivity in a computational model of spinal cord stimulation.

Authors:  Bryan Howell; Shivanand P Lad; Warren M Grill
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.