Literature DB >> 16619134

Effects of genetic and procedural variation on measurement of alcohol sensitivity in mouse inbred strains.

John C Crabbe1, Pamela Metten, Igor Ponomarev, Carol A Prescott, Douglas Wahlsten.   

Abstract

Mice from eight inbred strains were studied for their acute sensitivity to ethanol as indexed by the degree of hypothermia (HT), indexed as the reduction from pre-injection baseline of their body temperature. Two weeks later, mice were tested for their loss of righting reflex (LRR) after a higher dose of ethanol. The LRR was tested using the "classical" method of watching for recovery in animals placed on their backs in a V-shaped trough and recording duration of LRR. In a separate test, naive animals of the same strains were tested for HT repeatedly to assess the development of rapid (RTOL) and chronic tolerance (CTOL). We have recently developed a new method for testing LRR that leads to a substantial increase in the sensitivity of the test. Strains also have been found to differ in the new LRR test, as well as in the development of acute functional tolerance (AFT) to this response. In addition, our laboratory has periodically published strain difference data on the older versions of the HT and LRR responses. The earlier tests used some of the exact substrains tested currently, while for some strains, different substrains (usually, Nih versus Jax) were tested. We examined correlations of strain means to see whether patterns of strain differences were stable across time and across different test variants assessing the same behavioral construct. HT strain sensitivity scores were generally highly correlated across a 10-23 years period and test variants. The CTOL to HT was well-correlated across studies, and was also genetically similar to RTOL. The AFT, however, was related to neither RTOL nor CTOL, although this may be because different phenotypic end points were compared. The LRR data, which included a variant of the classical test, were not as stable. Measures of LRR onset were reasonably well correlated, as were those taken at recovery (e.g., duration). However, the two types of measures of LRR sensitivity to ethanol appear to be tapping traits that differ genetically. Also, the pattern of genetic correlation between HT and LRR initially reported in 1983 was not seen in current and contemporaneous studies. In certain instances, substrain seems to matter little, while in others, substrains differed a great deal. These data are generally encouraging about the stability of genetic differences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16619134     DOI: 10.1007/s10519-006-9067-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Genet        ISSN: 0001-8244            Impact factor:   2.805


  22 in total

1.  Varenicline modulates ethanol and saccharin consumption in adolescent male and female C57BL/6J mice.

Authors:  Helen M Kamens; Constanza Silva; Colette Peck; Carley N Miller
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 4.077

2.  Ethanol tolerance and withdrawal severity in high drinking in the dark selectively bred mice.

Authors:  John C Crabbe; Alexandre M Colville; Lauren C Kruse; Andy J Cameron; Stephanie E Spence; Jason P Schlumbohm; Lawrence C Huang; Pamela Metten
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 3.455

3.  The Cerebellar GABAAR System as a Potential Target for Treating Alcohol Use Disorder.

Authors:  David J Rossi; Ben D Richardson
Journal:  Handb Exp Pharmacol       Date:  2018

4.  Ethanol sensitivity in high drinking in the dark selectively bred mice.

Authors:  John C Crabbe; Lauren C Kruse; Alexandre M Colville; Andy J Cameron; Stephanie E Spence; Jason P Schlumbohm; Lawrence C Huang; Pamela Metten
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 3.455

5.  The α6 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunit influences ethanol-induced sedation.

Authors:  Helen M Kamens; Nicole R Hoft; Ryan J Cox; Jill H Miyamoto; Marissa A Ehringer
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 2.405

6.  Chronic ethanol intake alters circadian phase shifting and free-running period in mice.

Authors:  Joseph A Seggio; Michael C Fixaris; Jeffrey D Reed; Ryan W Logan; Alan M Rosenwasser
Journal:  J Biol Rhythms       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.182

7.  An alcohol withdrawal test battery measuring multiple behavioral symptoms in mice.

Authors:  Pamela Metten; Jason P Schlumbohm; Lawrence C Huang; Gian D Greenberg; Wyatt R Hack; Stephanie E Spence; John C Crabbe
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 2.405

8.  Voluntary wheel running reduces voluntary consumption of ethanol in mice: identification of candidate genes through striatal gene expression profiling.

Authors:  T M Darlington; R D McCarthy; R J Cox; J Miyamoto-Ditmon; X Gallego; M A Ehringer
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 3.449

9.  The opioid peptides enkephalin and beta-endorphin in alcohol dependence.

Authors:  Ildiko Racz; Britta Schürmann; Anna Karpushova; Martin Reuter; Sven Cichon; Christian Montag; Robert Fürst; Christian Schütz; Petra E Franke; Jana Strohmaier; Thomas F Wienker; Lars Terenius; Urban Osby; Agneta Gunnar; Wolfgang Maier; Andras Bilkei-Gorzó; Markus Nöthen; Andreas Zimmer
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 13.382

10.  Restraint stress and exogenous corticosterone differentially alter sensitivity to the sedative-hypnotic effects of ethanol in inbred long-sleep and inbred short-sleep mice.

Authors:  Clarissa Carlin Parker; Heather Ponicsan; Robert Leon Spencer; Andrew Holmes; Thomas Eugene Johnson
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.405

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.