Literature DB >> 16619052

Family-based designs in the age of large-scale gene-association studies.

Nan M Laird1, Christoph Lange.   

Abstract

Both population-based and family-based designs are commonly used in genetic association studies to locate genes that underlie complex diseases. The simplest version of the family-based design--the transmission disequilibrium test--is well known, but the numerous extensions that broaden its scope and power are less widely appreciated. Family-based designs have unique advantages over population-based designs, as they are robust against population admixture and stratification, allow both linkage and association to be tested for and offer a solution to the problem of model building. Furthermore, the fact that family-based designs contain both within- and between-family information has substantial benefits in terms of multiple-hypothesis testing, especially in the context of whole-genome association studies.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16619052     DOI: 10.1038/nrg1839

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Genet        ISSN: 1471-0056            Impact factor:   53.242


  158 in total

1.  A family-based joint test for mean and variance heterogeneity for quantitative traits.

Authors:  Ying Cao; Taylor J Maxwell; Peng Wei
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 1.670

2.  The FGF and FGFR Gene Family and Risk of Cleft Lip With or Without Cleft Palate.

Authors:  Hong Wang; Tianxiao Zhang; Tao Wu; Jacqueline B Hetmanski; Ingo Ruczinski; Holger Schwender; Kung Yee Liang; Tanda Murray; M Daniele Fallin; Richard J Redett; Gerald V Raymond; Sheng-Chih Jin; Yah-Huei Wu Chou; Philip Kuo-Ting Chen; Vincent Yeow; Samuel S Chong; Felicia S H Cheah; Sun Ha Jee; Ethylin W Jabs; Alan F Scott; Terri H Beaty
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2011-11-10

3.  Family-based association tests using genotype data with uncertainty.

Authors:  Zhaoxia Yu
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 5.899

4.  On the meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies: a robust and efficient approach to combine population and family-based studies.

Authors:  Sungho Won; Qing Lu; Lars Bertram; Rudolph E Tanzi; Christoph Lange
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 0.444

5.  Distribution of the number of false discoveries in large-scale family-based association testing with application to the association between PTPN1 and hypertension and obesity.

Authors:  Wen-Chang Wang; Chao A Hsiung; Lan-Chao Wang; Lee-Ming Chuang; Thomas Quertermous; I-Shou Chang
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  Tests for compositional epistasis under single interaction-parameter models.

Authors:  Tyler J VanderWeele; Nan M Laird
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 1.670

7.  Novel evidence of association with nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate was shown for single nucleotide polymorphisms in FOXF2 gene in an Asian population.

Authors:  Lingxue Bu; Qianqian Chen; Hong Wang; Tianxiao Zhang; Jacqueline B Hetmanski; Holger Schwender; Margaret Parker; Yah-Huei Wu Chou; Vincent Yeow; Samuel S Chong; Bo Zhang; Ethylin Wang Jabs; Alan F Scott; Terri H Beaty
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2015-08-17

8.  A comparison of popular TDT-generalizations for family-based association analysis.

Authors:  Julian Hecker; Nan Laird; Christoph Lange
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 2.135

9.  Is the gene-environment interaction paradigm relevant to genome-wide studies? The case of education and body mass index.

Authors:  Jason D Boardman; Benjamin W Domingue; Casey L Blalock; Brett C Haberstick; Kathleen Mullan Harris; Matthew B McQueen
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2014-02

10.  On combining triads and unrelated subjects data in candidate gene studies: an application to data on testicular cancer.

Authors:  Li Hsu; Jacqueline R Starr; Yingye Zheng; Stephen M Schwartz
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 0.444

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.