Literature DB >> 16618904

Impact of sentinel node status and other risk factors on the clinical outcome of head and neck melanoma patients.

Stanley P L Leong1, Neil A Accortt, Richard Essner, Merrick Ross, Jeffrey E Gershenwald, Barbara Pockaj, Harald J Hoekstra, Carlos Garberoglio, Richard L White, David Chu, Merrill Biel, Kim Charney, Harold Wanebo, Eli Avisar, John Vetto, Seng-Jaw Soong.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of sentinel lymph node (SLN) status and other risk factors on recurrence and overall survival in head and neck melanoma patients.
DESIGN: The SLN Working Group, based in San Francisco, Calif, with its 11 member centers, the John Wayne Cancer Institute, and The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center pooled data on 629 primary head and neck melanoma patients who had selective sentinel lymphadenectomy. A total of 614 subjects were analyzable. All centers obtained internal review board approval and adhered to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 regulations. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify factors associated with overall and disease-free survival.
SETTING: Tertiary care medical centers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Clinical outcome of head and neck melanoma patients undergoing selective sentinel lymphadenectomy.
RESULTS: Overall, 10.1% (n = 62) of the subjects had at least 1 positive node. Subjects with positive SLN status had significantly thicker tumors (mean thickness, 2.8 vs 2.1 mm; P < .001), and were more likely to have ulcerated tumors (P = .004). During the median follow-up of 3.3 years, the overall mortality from head and neck melanoma was 10%, with more than 20% experiencing at least 1 recurrence. Multivariate analysis showed that tumor site was an independent predictor of mortality; location on the scalp had a more than 3-fold (P < .001) greater mortality than tumors on the face. Tumor thickness was also an independent predictor of overall survival, and SLN status was the most important predictor of disease-free survival in the multivariate model (P < .001). Tumors on the scalp had the highest rate of recurrence, while those on the neck had the lowest. Tumor ulceration was the significant predictor of time to recurrence or disease-free survival (P < .001).
CONCLUSION: In this multicenter study, SLN status and other risk factors have an effect on recurrence and/or overall survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16618904     DOI: 10.1001/archotol.132.4.370

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0886-4470


  12 in total

Review 1.  Sentinel lymph node biopsy: vision, multicentre trials, professional and technological synergy.

Authors:  Giovanni Lucignani
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-08-17       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Sentinel lymph node biopsy in cutaneous head and neck melanoma.

Authors:  D Evrard; E Routier; C Mateus; G Tomasic; J Lombroso; F Kolb; C Robert; A Moya-Plana
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Tumor location predicts survival in cutaneous head and neck melanoma.

Authors:  Warren H Tseng; Steve R Martinez
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 2.192

4.  Stratifying SLN incidence in intermediate thickness melanoma patients.

Authors:  James M Chang; Heidi E Kosiorek; Amylou C Dueck; Stanley P L Leong; John T Vetto; Richard L White; Eli Avisar; Vernon K Sondak; Jane L Messina; Jonathan S Zager; Carlos Garberoglio; Mohammed Kashani-Sabet; Barbara A Pockaj
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  The prognostic importance of scalp location in primary head and neck melanoma.

Authors:  Junko Ozao-Choy; Daniel W Nelson; Jason Hiles; Stacey Stern; Jeong Lim Yoon; Myung Shin Sim; Mark B Faries
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 3.454

6.  Sentinel lymph node biopsy in head and neck melanoma*.

Authors:  G Giudice; S Leuzzi; F Robusto; V Ronghi; E Nacchiero; G Giardinelli; G Di Gioia; L Ragusa; M Pascone
Journal:  G Chir       Date:  2014 May-Jun

Review 7.  The Prognostic Value of Age, Sex, and Subsite in Cutaneous Head and Neck Melanoma: A Clinical Review of Recent Literature.

Authors:  Sameep Kadakia; David Chan; Moustafa Mourad; Yadranko Ducic
Journal:  Iran J Cancer Prev       Date:  2016-06-08

8.  Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Head and Neck Melanoma: Long-term Outcomes, Prognostic Value, Accuracy, and Safety.

Authors:  John E Hanks; Kevin J Kovatch; S Ahmed Ali; Emily Roberts; Alison B Durham; Joshua D Smith; Carol R Bradford; Kelly M Malloy; Philip S Boonstra; Christopher D Lao; Scott A McLean
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 3.497

9.  Giant scalp melanoma: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Jessica A Ching; Lisa Gould
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2012-11-16

10.  Evaluation of the prognostic impact of postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy on head and neck mucosal melanoma: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wei Li; Yalian Yu; Hailong Wang; Aihui Yan; Xuejun Jiang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.