Literature DB >> 32041486

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Head and Neck Melanoma: Long-term Outcomes, Prognostic Value, Accuracy, and Safety.

John E Hanks1, Kevin J Kovatch1, S Ahmed Ali1, Emily Roberts2, Alison B Durham3, Joshua D Smith1, Carol R Bradford1,4, Kelly M Malloy1, Philip S Boonstra2, Christopher D Lao5, Scott A McLean1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term outcomes of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for head and neck cutaneous melanoma (HNCM). STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: Tertiary academic medical center. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Longitudinal review of a 356-patient cohort with HNCM undergoing SLNB from 1997 to 2007.
RESULTS: Descriptive characteristics included the following: age, 53.5 ± 19 years (mean ± SD); sex, 26.8% female; median follow-up, 4.9 years; and Breslow depth, 2.52 ± 1.87 mm. Overall, 75 (21.1%) patients had a positive SLNB. Among patients undergoing completion lymph node dissection following positive SLNB, 20 (27.4%) had at least 1 additional positive nonsentinel lymph node. Eighteen patients with local control and negative SLNB developed regional disease, indicating a false omission rate of 6.4%, including 10 recurrences in previously unsampled basins. Ten-year overall survival (OS) and melanoma-specific survival (MSS) were significantly greater in the negative sentinel lymph node (SLN) cohort (OS, 61% [95% CI, 0.549-0.677]; MSS, 81.9% [95% CI, 0.769-0.873]) than the positive SLN cohort (OS, 31% [95% CI, 0.162-0.677]; MSS, 60.3% [95% CI, 0.464-0.785]) and positive SLN/positive nonsentinel lymph node cohort (OS, 8.4% [95% CI, 0.015-0.474]; MSS, 9.6% [95% CI, 0.017-0.536]). OS was significantly associated with SLN positivity (hazard ratio [HR], 2.39; P < .01), immunosuppression (HR, 2.37; P < .01), angiolymphatic invasion (HR, 1.91; P < .01), and ulceration (HR, 1.86; P < .01). SLN positivity (HR, 3.13; P < .01), angiolymphatic invasion (HR, 3.19; P < .01), and number of mitoses (P = .0002) were significantly associated with MSS. Immunosuppression (HR, 3.01; P < .01) and SLN status (HR, 2.84; P < .01) were associated with recurrence-free survival, and immunosuppression was the only factor significantly associated with regional recurrence (HR, 6.59; P < .01).
CONCLUSIONS: Long-term follow up indicates that SLNB showcases durable accuracy, safety, and prognostic importance for cutaneous HNCM.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cutaneous; false omission; head and neck; melanoma; otolaryngology; sentinel lymph node biopsy

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32041486      PMCID: PMC8012010          DOI: 10.1177/0194599819899934

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  69 in total

Review 1.  Is sentinel lymph node biopsy the standard of care for cutaneous head and neck melanoma?

Authors:  Cecelia E Schmalbach; Carol R Bradford
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Cranial nerve outcomes in regionally recurrent head & neck melanoma after sentinel lymph node biopsy.

Authors:  John E Hanks; Pratyusha Yalamanchi; Kevin J Kovatch; S Ahmed Ali; Joshua D Smith; Alison B Durham; Carol R Bradford; Kelly M Malloy; Scott A McLean
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Evidence for a better nodal staging system for melanoma: the clinical relevance of metastatic disease confined to the sentinel lymph nodes.

Authors:  Michael Reintgen; Lauren Murray; Kurt Akman; Rosemary Giuliano; Alyson Lozicki; Steve Shivers; Douglas Reintgen
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Sentinel lymph node biopsy in the management of cutaneous head and neck melanoma.

Authors:  Grant W Carlson; Douglas R Murray; Robert H Lyles; Andrea Hestley; Cynthia Cohen
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 5.  Final version of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  C M Balch; A C Buzaid; S J Soong; M B Atkins; N Cascinelli; D G Coit; I D Fleming; J E Gershenwald; A Houghton; J M Kirkwood; K M McMasters; M F Mihm; D L Morton; D S Reintgen; M I Ross; A Sober; J A Thompson; J F Thompson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-08-15       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Predictors of nonsentinel lymph node positivity in patients with a positive sentinel node for melanoma.

Authors:  Michael S Sabel; Kent Griffith; Vernon K Sondak; Lori Lowe; Jennifer L Schwartz; Vincent M Cimmino; Alfred E Chang; Riley S Rees; Carol R Bradford; Timothy M Johnson
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Sentinel-node biopsy or nodal observation in melanoma.

Authors:  Donald L Morton; John F Thompson; Alistair J Cochran; Nicola Mozzillo; Robert Elashoff; Richard Essner; Omgo E Nieweg; Daniel F Roses; Harald J Hoekstra; Constantine P Karakousis; Douglas S Reintgen; Brendon J Coventry; Edwin C Glass; He-Jing Wang
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-09-28       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Clinical significance of occult metastatic melanoma in sentinel lymph nodes and other high-risk factors based on long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Stanley P L Leong; Mohammed Kashani-Sabet; Renee A Desmond; Robert P Kim; Dennis H Nguyen; Kensho Iwanaga; Patrick A Treseler; Robert E Allen; Eugene T Morita; Yuting Zhang; Richard W Sagebiel; Seng-Jaw Soong
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Comparison of Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography-Computed Tomography (SPECT/CT) and Conventional Planar Lymphoscintigraphy for Sentinel Node Localization in Patients with Cutaneous Malignancies.

Authors:  Matthew P Doepker; Maki Yamamoto; Matthew A Applebaum; Nupur U Patel; M Jaime Montilla-Soler; Amod A Sarnaik; C Wayne Cruse; Vernon K Sondak; Jonathan S Zager
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Patterns of recurrence after sentinel lymph node biopsy for cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  Timothy R Fincher; Todd M McCarty; Tammy L Fisher; John T Preskitt; Zelig H Lieberman; Jeffrey F Stephens; John C O'Brien; Joseph A Kuhn
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.565

View more
  1 in total

1.  Do Oncologic Outcomes From Head and Neck Versus Truncal and Extremity Melanoma Differ? A Single-Institution Single-Subspecialty Experience.

Authors:  Kirsten M Baecher; Michael K Turgeon; Caroline R Medin; Geetha Mahendran; Terrill M Flakes; Keith A Delman; Michael C Lowe
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 0.688

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.