Literature DB >> 16615749

Family members' perceptions of augmentative and alternative communication device use.

Rita L Bailey1, Howard P Parette, Julia B Stoner, Maureen E Angell, Kathleen Carroll.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Although advancements in technology have expanded the use of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) devices for children with disabilities, the use of AAC devices in school and home settings is often inconsistent. The purpose of this study was to examine family members' perceptions regarding the use of AAC devices. Factors that were perceived to affect student's use of AAC devices, family expectations, and benefits of AAC device use were explored.
METHOD: Semistructured interviews were conducted with 6 family members (primary caregivers) of 7 youth who primarily use AAC devices to communicate in the school environment. The interviews were analyzed using cross-case analysis.
RESULTS: A variety of common perspectives emerged from the data, including four thematic categories: expectations, facilitators, barriers, and benefits of AAC device use. IMPLICATIONS: Information gained in this investigation may be used to improve professional-family and teaming relationships and serve to benefit AAC users in school and home settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16615749     DOI: 10.1044/0161-1461(2006/006)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch        ISSN: 0161-1461            Impact factor:   2.983


  7 in total

1.  Family-centered Services for Children with ASD and Limited Speech: The Experiences of Parents and Speech-language Pathologists.

Authors:  Kelsey Mandak; Janice Light
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2018-04

2.  Stakeholder consensus for decision making in eye-gaze control technology for children, adolescents and adults with cerebral palsy service provision: findings from a Delphi study.

Authors:  Petra Karlsson; Tom Griffiths; Michael T Clarke; Elegast Monbaliu; Kate Himmelmann; Saranda Bekteshi; Abigail Allsop; René Pereksles; Claire Galea; Margaret Wallen
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 2.474

3.  A validation and acceptability study of cognitive testing using switch and eye-gaze control technologies for children with motor and speech impairments: A protocol paper.

Authors:  Petra Karlsson; Ingrid Honan; Seth Warschausky; Jacqueline N Kaufman; Georgina Henry; Candice Stephenson; Annabel Webb; Alistair McEwan; Nadia Badawi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-09-26

Review 4.  Four-Repeat Tauopathies: Current Management and Future Treatments.

Authors:  Lawren VandeVrede; Peter A Ljubenkov; Julio C Rojas; Ariane E Welch; Adam L Boxer
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 7.620

5.  The Effects of an Online Training on Preservice Speech-Language Pathologists' Use of Family-Centered Skills.

Authors:  Kelsey Mandak; Janice Light; David McNaughton
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 4.018

6.  Finding the best fit: examining the decision-making of augmentative and alternative communication professionals in the UK using a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Edward J D Webb; Yvonne Lynch; David Meads; Simon Judge; Nicola Randall; Juliet Goldbart; Stuart Meredith; Liz Moulam; Stephane Hess; Janice Murray
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Development of a new high sensitivity mechanical switch for augmentative and alternative communication access in people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Authors:  M Caligari; M Godi; M Giardini; R Colombo
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 4.262

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.