Literature DB >> 16615337

Temporal expectations modulate attentional capture.

Dominique Lamy1.   

Abstract

Subjects' ability to override attentional capture by salient distractors during singleton search has been attributed to the adoption of an attentional set for the type of discontinuity characterizing the target (Folk, Remington, & Johnston, 1992) or to fast disengagement of attention from the salient distractor's location (Theeuwes, Atchley, & Kramer, 2000). The present results support an alternative account by showing that temporal expectancies modulate attentional capture. In a color singleton search, an irrelevant onset preceding the target by a given time interval produced capture when the distractor-to-target interval varied unpredictably but failed to do so when this interval was predictable. Moreover, with unpredictable intervals and moderately salient stimuli, capture was overridden at the expected average interval. These findings invite caution when stimulus onset asynchrony manipulations are used to study the temporal deployment of attention, since they demonstrate that such manipulations introduce powerful temporal expectations.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16615337     DOI: 10.3758/bf03206452

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  19 in total

1.  A salient distractor does not disrupt conjunction search.

Authors:  D Lamy; Y Tsal
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-03

2.  Attentional capture in singleton-detection and feature-search modes.

Authors:  Dominique Lamy; Howard E Egeth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Top-down search strategies cannot override attentional capture.

Authors:  Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-02

Review 4.  Attentional capture by auto- and allo-cues.

Authors:  Robert Rauschenberger
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-12

5.  Orienting in space and time: joint contributions to exogenous spatial cuing effects.

Authors:  Bruce Milliken; Juan Lupiáñez; Martha Roberts; Biljana Stevanovski
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-12

6.  Effects of task relevance and stimulus-driven salience in feature-search mode.

Authors:  Dominique Lamy; Andrew Leber; Howard E Egeth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Effects of search mode and intertrial priming on singleton search.

Authors:  Dominique Lamy; Tomer Carmel; Howard E Egeth; Andrew B Leber
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2006-08

8.  Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity.

Authors:  J Theeuwes
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-08

9.  Where and when to pay attention: the neural systems for directing attention to spatial locations and to time intervals as revealed by both PET and fMRI.

Authors:  J T Coull; A C Nobre
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture.

Authors:  W F Bacon; H E Egeth
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-05
View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Displaywide visual features associated with a search display's appearance can mediate attentional capture.

Authors:  Bryan R Burnham
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-06

2.  Time changes: Timing contexts support event segmentation in associative memory.

Authors:  Vincent van de Ven; Moritz Jäckels; Peter De Weerd
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-10-13

3.  Temporal consistency is currency in shifts of transient visual attention.

Authors:  Arni Kristjánsson; Katrín Ósk Eyjólfsdóttir; Anna Jónsdóttir; Guðmundur Arnkelsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Revealing Dissociable Attention Biases in Chronic Smokers Through an Individual-Differences Approach.

Authors:  Chiara Della Libera; Thomas Zandonai; Lorenzo Zamboni; Elisa Santandrea; Marco Sandri; Fabio Lugoboni; Cristiano Chiamulera; Leonardo Chelazzi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Evidence inhibition responds reactively to the salience of distracting information during focused attention.

Authors:  Natalie Wyatt; Liana Machado
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.