Literature DB >> 16615322

Syntactic class influences phonological priming of tip-of-the-tongue resolution.

Lise Abrams1, Emily L Rodriguez.   

Abstract

During tip-of-the-tongue (TOT) experiences, phonologically related words have both facilitated and impeded word retrieval. In the present experiment, we examined whether phonologically related words' syntactic class (part of speech) is responsible for these differential effects. Sixty college students saw general knowledge questions whose answers were designated target words and responded "know," "don't know," or "TOT." Following "TOT" and "don't know" responses, the participants saw five words, one of which was a prime. The primes contained the target's first syllable and either shared or did not share the target's part of speech. Following presentation of the primes, retrieval of the target was attempted again. Different-part-of-speech primes facilitated resolution of TOT states, whereas same-part-of-speech primes had no effect, relative to phonologically unrelated words. These results support node structure theory's most-primed-wins principle and the transmission deficit model account of TOT states and detail the importance of syntactic class in the selection of words that are candidates for speech production.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16615322     DOI: 10.3758/bf03206437

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  8 in total

1.  Does priming specific syllables during tip-of-the-tongue states facilitate word retrieval in older adults?

Authors:  Katherine K White; Lise Abrams
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2002-06

Review 2.  Sparkling at the end of the tongue: the etiology of tip-of-the-tongue phenomenology.

Authors:  B L Schwartz
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-09

3.  The facilitative influence of phonological similarity and neighborhood frequency in speech production in younger and older adults.

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch; Mitchell S Sommers
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-06

4.  Isolating phonological components that increase tip-of-the-tongue resolution.

Authors:  Lise Abrams; Katherine K White; Stacy L Eitel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-12

Review 5.  A review of the tip-of-the-tongue experience.

Authors:  A S Brown
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Back to Woodworth: role of interlopers in the tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon.

Authors:  G V Jones
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1989-01

7.  A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production.

Authors:  G S Dell
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Phonological priming effects on word retrieval and tip-of-the-tongue experiences in young and older adults.

Authors:  L E James; D M Burke
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.051

  8 in total
  7 in total

1.  The distractor picture paradox in speech production: evidence from the word translation task.

Authors:  Eduardo Navarrete; Albert Costa
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2009-05-29

2.  Grammatical and phonological influences on word order.

Authors:  Niels Janssen; Alfonso Caramazza
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-08-19

3.  Tip of the Tongue States Increase Under Evaluative Observation.

Authors:  Lori E James; Christopher J Schmank; Nichol Castro; Tony W Buchanan
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2018-02

4.  Translation-priming effects on tip-of-the-tongue states.

Authors:  Tamar H Gollan; Victor S Ferreira; Cynthia Cera; Susanna Flett
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2014-01-01

5.  Incremental Phonological Encoding during Unscripted Sentence Production.

Authors:  T Florian Jaeger; Katrina Furth; Caitlin Hilliard
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-11-09

6.  Grammatical context constrains lexical competition in spoken word recognition.

Authors:  Julia Strand; Andrea Simenstad; Allison Cooperman; Jonathon Rowe
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-05

7.  Age-related differences in the retrieval of phonologically similar words during sentence processing: Evidence from ERPs.

Authors:  Hossein Karimi; Michele Diaz
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2021-06-19       Impact factor: 2.781

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.