BACKGROUND: Percent mammographic density (PMD) is a risk factor for breast cancer. Our previous twin study showed that the heritability of PMD was 63%. This study determined the heritabilities of the components of PMD, the areas of dense and nondense tissue in the mammogram. METHODS: We combined two twin studies comprising 571 monozygous and 380 dizygous twin pairs recruited from Australia and North America. Dense and nondense areas were measured using a computer-assisted method, and information about potential determinants was obtained by questionnaire. Under the assumptions of the classic twin model, we estimated the heritability of the log dense area and log nondense area and the genetic and environmental contributions to the covariance between the two traits, using maximum likelihood theory and the statistical package FISHER. RESULTS: After adjusting for measured determinants, for each of the log dense area and the log nondense area, the monozygous correlations were greater than the dizygous correlations. Heritability was estimated to be 65% (95% confidence interval, 60-70%) for dense area and 66% (95% confidence interval, 61-71%) for nondense area. The correlations (SE) between the two adjusted traits were -0.35 (0.023) in the same individual, -0.26 (0.026) across monozygous pairs, and -0.14 (0.034) across dizygous pairs. CONCLUSION: Genetic factors may play a large role in explaining variation in the mammographic areas of both dense and nondense tissue. About two thirds of the negative correlation between dense and nondense area is explained by the same genetic factors influencing both traits, but in opposite directions.
BACKGROUND: Percent mammographic density (PMD) is a risk factor for breast cancer. Our previous twin study showed that the heritability of PMD was 63%. This study determined the heritabilities of the components of PMD, the areas of dense and nondense tissue in the mammogram. METHODS: We combined two twin studies comprising 571 monozygous and 380 dizygous twin pairs recruited from Australia and North America. Dense and nondense areas were measured using a computer-assisted method, and information about potential determinants was obtained by questionnaire. Under the assumptions of the classic twin model, we estimated the heritability of the log dense area and log nondense area and the genetic and environmental contributions to the covariance between the two traits, using maximum likelihood theory and the statistical package FISHER. RESULTS: After adjusting for measured determinants, for each of the log dense area and the log nondense area, the monozygous correlations were greater than the dizygous correlations. Heritability was estimated to be 65% (95% confidence interval, 60-70%) for dense area and 66% (95% confidence interval, 61-71%) for nondense area. The correlations (SE) between the two adjusted traits were -0.35 (0.023) in the same individual, -0.26 (0.026) across monozygous pairs, and -0.14 (0.034) across dizygous pairs. CONCLUSION: Genetic factors may play a large role in explaining variation in the mammographic areas of both dense and nondense tissue. About two thirds of the negative correlation between dense and nondense area is explained by the same genetic factors influencing both traits, but in opposite directions.
Authors: Norman F Boyd; Lisa J Martin; Michael Bronskill; Martin J Yaffe; Neb Duric; Salomon Minkin Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2010-07-08 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Kavitha Krishnan; Laura Baglietto; Jennifer Stone; Julie A Simpson; Gianluca Severi; Christopher F Evans; Robert J MacInnis; Graham G Giles; Carmel Apicella; John L Hopper Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2017-01-06 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Jason J Northey; Alexander S Barrett; Irene Acerbi; Mary-Kate Hayward; Stephanie Talamantes; Ivory S Dean; Janna K Mouw; Suzanne M Ponik; Jonathon N Lakins; Po-Jui Huang; Junmin Wu; Quanming Shi; Susan Samson; Patricia J Keely; Rita A Mukhtar; Jan T Liphardt; John A Shepherd; E Shelley Hwang; Yunn-Yi Chen; Kirk C Hansen; Laurie E Littlepage; Valerie M Weaver Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2020-11-02 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Jennifer Stone; Deborah J Thompson; Isabel Dos Santos Silva; Christopher Scott; Rulla M Tamimi; Sara Lindstrom; Peter Kraft; Aditi Hazra; Jingmei Li; Louise Eriksson; Kamila Czene; Per Hall; Matt Jensen; Julie Cunningham; Janet E Olson; Kristen Purrington; Fergus J Couch; Judith Brown; Jean Leyland; Ruth M L Warren; Robert N Luben; Kay-Tee Khaw; Paula Smith; Nicholas J Wareham; Sebastian M Jud; Katharina Heusinger; Matthias W Beckmann; Julie A Douglas; Kaanan P Shah; Heang-Ping Chan; Mark A Helvie; Loic Le Marchand; Laurence N Kolonel; Christy Woolcott; Gertraud Maskarinec; Christopher Haiman; Graham G Giles; Laura Baglietto; Kavitha Krishnan; Melissa C Southey; Carmel Apicella; Irene L Andrulis; Julia A Knight; Giske Ursin; Grethe I Grenaker Alnaes; Vessela N Kristensen; Anne-Lise Borresen-Dale; Inger Torhild Gram; Manjeet K Bolla; Qin Wang; Kyriaki Michailidou; Joe Dennis; Jacques Simard; Paul Pharoah; Alison M Dunning; Douglas F Easton; Peter A Fasching; V Shane Pankratz; John L Hopper; Celine M Vachon Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2015-04-10 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Celine M Vachon; Christopher G Scott; Peter A Fasching; Per Hall; Rulla M Tamimi; Jingmei Li; Jennifer Stone; Carmel Apicella; Fabrice Odefrey; Gretchen L Gierach; Sebastian M Jud; Katharina Heusinger; Matthias W Beckmann; Marina Pollan; Pablo Fernández-Navarro; Anna Gonzalez-Neira; Javier Benitez; Carla H van Gils; Mariëtte Lokate; N Charlotte Onland-Moret; Petra H M Peeters; Judith Brown; Jean Leyland; Jajini S Varghese; Douglas F Easton; Deborah J Thompson; Robert N Luben; Ruth M L Warren; Nicholas J Wareham; Ruth J F Loos; Kay-Tee Khaw; Giske Ursin; Eunjung Lee; Simon A Gayther; Susan J Ramus; Rosalind A Eeles; Martin O Leach; Gek Kwan-Lim; Fergus J Couch; Graham G Giles; Laura Baglietto; Kavitha Krishnan; Melissa C Southey; Loic Le Marchand; Laurence N Kolonel; Christy Woolcott; Gertraud Maskarinec; Christopher A Haiman; Kate Walker; Nichola Johnson; Valeria A McCormack; Margarethe Biong; Grethe I G Alnaes; Inger Torhild Gram; Vessela N Kristensen; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale; Sara Lindström; Susan E Hankinson; David J Hunter; Irene L Andrulis; Julia A Knight; Norman F Boyd; Jonine D Figuero; Jolanta Lissowska; Ewa Wesolowska; Beata Peplonska; Agnieszka Bukowska; Edyta Reszka; JianJun Liu; Louise Eriksson; Kamila Czene; Tina Audley; Anna H Wu; V Shane Pankratz; John L Hopper; Isabel dos-Santos-Silva Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2012-03-27 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Michael P Lisanti; Aristotelis Tsirigos; Stephanos Pavlides; Kimberley Jayne Reeves; Maria Peiris-Pagès; Amy L Chadwick; Rosa Sanchez-Alvarez; Rebecca Lamb; Anthony Howell; Ubaldo E Martinez-Outschoorn; Federica Sotgia Journal: Cell Cycle Date: 2013-12-05 Impact factor: 4.534