Literature DB >> 16613929

Determination of interobserver variability for identifying inducible left ventricular wall motion abnormalities during dobutamine stress magnetic resonance imaging.

Ingo Paetsch1, Cosima Jahnke, Victor A Ferrari, Frank E Rademakers, Patricia A Pellikka, W Gregory Hundley, Don Poldermans, Jeroen J Bax, Karl Wegscheider, Eckart Fleck, Eike Nagel.   

Abstract

AIMS: To determine the interobserver variability for identifying inducible left ventricular (LV) wall motion abnormalities during high-dose dobutamine/atropine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance (DSMR). METHODS AND
RESULTS: Four readers from various institutions were supplied with the image data from 150 consecutive DSMR examinations and asked to grade wall motion and image quality throughout graded doses of dobutamine infusion administered to achieve 85% of the maximum age-predicted heart rate. Inducible ischaemia was identified if more than one segment demonstrated a new or worsening LV wall motion abnormality, and significant stenosis was defined as > or =50% luminal diameter reduction by quantitative contrast coronary angiography. Seventy-seven patients (51%) had luminal narrowings > or =50%. Diagnostic performance (sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy) of all readers was 78.2, 87.0 and 82.5%. Disagreement between two readers occurred in every seventh examination. Agreement on the presence or absence of inducible wall motion abnormalities was moderate (mean kappa value 0.59, range 0.52-0.76). Diagnostic performance and disagreement were independent of the presence of luminal narrowings > or =50% or the number of diseased coronary vessels. Image quality was regarded excellent in 89.3% of standard views.
CONCLUSION: In the setting of multiple observers from different institutions performing a diagnostic reading of DSMR examinations carried out at a single centre, the interobserver variability was low for identifying inducible LV wall motion abnormalities indicative of coronary arterial luminal narrowings > or =50%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16613929     DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi883

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  30 in total

1.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 3.  Cardiac magnetic resonance stress testing: results and prognosis.

Authors:  Amedeo Chiribiri; Nuno Bettencourt; Eike Nagel
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 4.  Assessment of myocardial ischemia with cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Bobak Heydari; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Raymond Y Kwong
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 8.194

Review 5.  The emerging clinical role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Andreas Kumar; David J Patton; Matthias G Friedrich
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2010 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 5.223

6.  Dobutamine stress tagging and gradient-echo imaging for detection of coronary heart disease at 3 T.

Authors:  D Thomas; C Meyer; K Strach; C P Naehle; J Mazraeh; T Gampert; H H Schild; T Sommer
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  A collaborative resource to build consensus for automated left ventricular segmentation of cardiac MR images.

Authors:  Avan Suinesiaputra; Brett R Cowan; Ahmed O Al-Agamy; Mustafa A Elattar; Nicholas Ayache; Ahmed S Fahmy; Ayman M Khalifa; Pau Medrano-Gracia; Marie-Pierre Jolly; Alan H Kadish; Daniel C Lee; Ján Margeta; Simon K Warfield; Alistair A Young
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 8.545

8.  Coronary computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Birgit Kantor; Eike Nagel; Paul Schoenhagen; Jörg Barkhausen; Thomas C Gerber
Journal:  Curr Probl Cardiol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.200

9.  Prediction of cardiac events in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction with dobutamine cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment of wall motion score index.

Authors:  Erica Dall'Armellina; Timothy M Morgan; Sangeeta Mandapaka; William Ntim; J Jeffrey Carr; Craig A Hamilton; John Hoyle; Hollins Clark; Paige Clark; Kerry M Link; Doug Case; W Gregory Hundley
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-07-22       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 10.  Assessment of myocardial ischemia and viability using cardiac magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Nuno Bettencourt; Amedeo Chiribiri; Andreas Schuster; Eike Nagel
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2009-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.