Literature DB >> 16612731

[Value of diffusion-weighted imaging for diagnosing vertebral metastases due to prostate cancer in comparison to other primary tumors].

T Hackländer1, C Scharwächter, R Golz, H Mertens.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Several publications have reported that the apparent diffusion coefficient is generally lower in metastatically affected vertebrae. Therefore, metastases are represented in diffusion-weighted images by increased signal intensity in comparison to unaffected vertebrae. However, there were indications that metastases due to prostate cancer may differ from this. Therefore, the contrast behavior of vertebral metastases due to prostate cancer or tumors with another histology are to be systematically studied using diffusion-weighted images. The present study is intended to examine whether the two groups differed and whether possible differences depended on the degree of sclerosis. MATERIALS AND
METHOD: In a retrospective study the vertebral metastases of patients with prostate cancer (n = 18) were compared to those of patients with tumors of another histology (n = 20). A steady-state free precession sequence was used for the diffusion-weighted imaging. Additionally, a T1 weighted sequence before and after administration of contrast agent as well as a fat suppressed T2 weighted sequence were performed. The contrast behavior of the metastases was evaluated for all four sequences and was compared to that of the unaffected parts of the vertebra.
RESULTS: In 18 patients of the tumor group, the vertebral metastases showed positive contrast in the diffusion-weighted images, and 2 had minimally negative contrast up to - 0.04. In the prostate cancer group, the contrast was positive in 9 patients and negative in 9. 6 of the metastases with negative contrast had an osteoblastic metastasization, 1 had an osteolysis, and 1 had a normal finding in the conventional X-ray image. Between the tumor group and the prostate cancer group, the medians of the contrasts were not significantly different (p = 0.054).
CONCLUSION: In general, the metastatically affected vertebrae appear hyperintense in the diffusion-weighted images. This observation is only true for some vertebral metastases due to prostate cancer. The cause for this seems to be the degree of sclerosis of the metastases. Thus, it cannot be generally deduced from the hypointensity in diffusion-weighted images that a lesion is benign.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16612731     DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-926566

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rofo        ISSN: 1438-9010


  11 in total

1.  Proton density fat fraction (PDFF) MRI for differentiation of benign and malignant vertebral lesions.

Authors:  Frederic Carsten Schmeel; Julian Alexander Luetkens; Peter Johannes Wagenhäuser; Michael Meier-Schroers; Daniel Lloyd Kuetting; Andreas Feißt; Jürgen Gieseke; Leonard Christopher Schmeel; Frank Träber; Hans Heinz Schild; Guido Matthias Kukuk
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in differentiation between osteoporotic and neoplastic vertebral fractures.

Authors:  G Pozzi; C Garcia Parra; P Stradiotti; T V Tien; A Luzzati; A Zerbi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Multiparameter MRI assessment of normal-appearing and diseased vertebral bone marrow.

Authors:  Andreas Biffar; Andrea Baur-Melnyk; Gerwin P Schmidt; Maximilian F Reiser; Olaf Dietrich
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Diffusion-weighted MR imaging (DWI) in the evaluation of epidural spinal lesions.

Authors:  Christina Plank; Anke Koller; Christina Mueller-Mang; Roland Bammer; Majda M Thurnher
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2007-10-19       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 5.  Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer: present and future.

Authors:  John Kurhanewicz; Daniel Vigneron; Peter Carroll; Fergus Coakley
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.309

6.  Diffusion-weighted MR imaging for characterizing musculoskeletal lesions.

Authors:  Ty K Subhawong; Michael A Jacobs; Laura M Fayad
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.333

7.  [Differentiation between acute osteoporotic and metastatic vertebral body fractures by imaging].

Authors:  T Geith; M Reiser; A Baur-Melnyk
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.000

8.  MR Imaging of Prostate Cancer: Diffusion Weighted Imaging and (3D) Hydrogen 1 (H) MR Spectroscopy in Comparison with Histology.

Authors:  J Yamamura; G Salomon; R Buchert; A Hohenstein; J Graessner; H Huland; M Graefen; G Adam; U Wedegaetner
Journal:  Radiol Res Pract       Date:  2010-07-20

Review 9.  Malignant versus benign vertebral collapse: are new imaging techniques useful?

Authors:  Andrea Baur-Melnyk
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 3.909

10.  Proton Density Fat Fraction Spine MRI for Differentiation of Erosive Vertebral Endplate Degeneration and Infectious Spondylitis.

Authors:  Frederic Carsten Schmeel; Asadeh Lakghomi; Nils Christian Lehnen; Robert Haase; Mohammed Banat; Johannes Wach; Nikolaus Handke; Hartmut Vatter; Alexander Radbruch; Ulrike Attenberger; Julian Alexander Luetkens
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.