Literature DB >> 16612051

Envelope following responses to natural vowels.

Steven J Aiken1, Terence W Picton.   

Abstract

Envelope following responses to natural vowels were recorded in 10 normal hearing people. Responses were recorded to individual vowels (/a/, /i/, /u/) with a relatively steady pitch, to /[symbol: see text]/ with a variable and steady pitch, and to a multivowel stimulus (/[symbol: see text]ui/) with a steady pitch. Responses were analyzed using a Fourier analyzer, so that recorded responses could follow the changes in the pitch. Significant responses were detected for all subjects to /a/, /i/ and /u/ with the time required to detect a significant response ranging from 6 to 66 s (average time: 19 s). Responses to /[symbol: see text]/ and /[symbol: see text]ui/ were detected in all subjects, but took longer to demonstrate (average time: 73 s). These results support the use of a Fourier analyzer to measure envelope following responses to natural speech. Copyright 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16612051     DOI: 10.1159/000092589

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Audiol Neurootol        ISSN: 1420-3030            Impact factor:   1.854


  17 in total

1.  Auditory midbrain representation of a break in interaural correlation.

Authors:  Qian Wang; Liang Li
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  A comparison of spectral magnitude and phase-locking value analyses of the frequency-following response to complex tones.

Authors:  Li Zhu; Hari Bharadwaj; Jing Xia; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effects of Aging on the Encoding of Dynamic and Static Components of Speech.

Authors:  Alessandro Presacco; Kimberly Jenkins; Rachel Lieberman; Samira Anderson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  The Accuracy of Envelope Following Responses in Predicting Speech Audibility.

Authors:  Vijayalakshmi Easwar; Jen Birstler; Adrienne Harrison; Susan Scollie; David Purcell
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Brainstem correlates of concurrent speech identification in adverse listening conditions.

Authors:  Anusha Yellamsetty; Gavin M Bidelman
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Variability in the Estimated Amplitude of Vowel-Evoked Envelope Following Responses Caused by Assumed Neurophysiologic Processing Delays.

Authors:  Vijayalakshmi Easwar; Steven Aiken; Krystal Beh; Emma McGrath; Mary Galloy; Susan Scollie; David Purcell
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-08-24

7.  Rapid acquisition of auditory subcortical steady state responses using multichannel recordings.

Authors:  Hari M Bharadwaj; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 8.  Auditory brain stem response to complex sounds: a tutorial.

Authors:  Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Hearing it again and again: on-line subcortical plasticity in humans.

Authors:  Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Chirp Analyzer for Estimating Amplitude and Latency of Steady-State Auditory Envelope Following Responses.

Authors:  Eduardo Martinez-Montes; Yalina Garcia-Puente; Matias Zanartu; Pavel Prado-Gutierrez
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 3.802

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.