Literature DB >> 16611814

Estimation of the timing of human visual perception from magnetoencephalography.

Kaoru Amano1, Naokazu Goda, Shin'ya Nishida, Yoshimichi Ejima, Tsunehiro Takeda, Yoshio Ohtani.   

Abstract

To explore the timing and the underlying neural dynamics of visual perception, we analyzed the relationship between the manual reaction time (RT) to the onset of a visual stimulus and the time course of the evoked neural response simultaneously measured by magnetoencephalography (MEG). The visual stimuli were a transition from incoherent to coherent motion of random dots and an onset of a chromatic grating from a uniform field, which evoke neural responses in different cortical sites. For both stimuli, changes in median RT with changing stimulus strength (motion coherence or chromatic contrast) were accurately predicted, with a stimulus-independent postdetection delay, from the time that the temporally integrated MEG response crossed a threshold (integrator model). In comparison, the prediction of RT was less accurate from the peak MEG latency, or from the time that the nonintegrated MEG response crossed a threshold (level detector model). The integrator model could also account for, at least partially, intertrial changes in RT or in perception (hit/miss) to identical stimuli. Although we examined MEG-RT relationships mainly for data averaged over trials, the integrator model could show some correlations even for single-trial data. The model predictions deteriorated when only early visual responses presumably originating from the striate cortex were used as the input to the integrator model. Our results suggest that the perceptions for visual stimulus appearances are established in extrastriate areas [around MT (middle temporal visual area) for motion and around V4 (fourth visual area) for color] approximately 150-200 ms before subjects manually react to the stimulus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16611814      PMCID: PMC6673893          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4343-05.2006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  20 in total

Review 1.  A primer on motion visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  Sven P Heinrich
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Medial prefrontal theta bursts precede rapid motor responses during visual selective attention.

Authors:  Arnaud Delorme; Marissa Westerfield; Scott Makeig
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-10-31       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Strong correlations between sensitivity and variability give rise to constant discrimination thresholds across the otolith afferent population.

Authors:  Mohsen Jamali; Jerome Carriot; Maurice J Chacron; Kathleen E Cullen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Testing declarative memory in laboratory rats and mice using the nonconditioned social discrimination procedure.

Authors:  Mario Engelmann; Jana Hädicke; Julia Noack
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 13.491

5.  Banknote recognition: investigating processing and cognition framework using competitive neural network.

Authors:  Oyebade K Oyedotun; Adnan Khashman
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 5.082

6.  Executive Function Brain Network Activation Predicts Driving Hazard Detection in ADHD.

Authors:  Haley M Bednarz; Despina Stavrinos; Austin M Svancara; Gabriela M Sherrod; Benjamin McManus; Hrishikesh D Deshpande; Rajesh K Kana
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 3.020

7.  Sparsity and compressed coding in sensory systems.

Authors:  Victor J Barranca; Gregor Kovačič; Douglas Zhou; David Cai
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  Retrospective perceptual distortion of position representation does not lead to delayed localization.

Authors:  Ricky K C Au; Fuminori Ono; Katsumi Watanabe
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2013-03-15

9.  High-frequency oscillations in distributed neural networks reveal the dynamics of human decision making.

Authors:  Adrian G Guggisberg; Sarang S Dalal; Anne M Findlay; Srikantan S Nagarajan
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  The Brain Is Faster than the Hand in Split-Second Intentions to Respond to an Impending Hazard: A Simulation of Neuroadaptive Automation to Speed Recovery to Perturbation in Flight Attitude.

Authors:  Daniel E Callan; Cengiz Terzibas; Daniel B Cassel; Masa-Aki Sato; Raja Parasuraman
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.