Literature DB >> 16611760

Multicenter evaluation of a self-expanding carotid stent system with distal protection in the treatment of carotid stenosis.

M D Hill1, W Morrish, G Soulez, A Nevelsteen, G Maleux, C Rogers, K E Hauptmann, A Bonafé, R Beyar, L Gruberg, J Schofer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Carotid artery stent placement may be limited by the embolization of atheromatous material. We evaluated the safety and feasibility of the Medtronic Self-Expanding Carotid Stent (Exponent) in combination with the Medtronic Interceptor Carotid Filter System for the treatment of carotid stenosis among patients at high risk for carotid endarterectomy.
METHODS: Patients at high risk for carotid endarterectomy but amenable to percutaneous treatment with stent placement were enrolled. Clinical follow-up was performed at 30 days and 6 and 12 months postprocedure. The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale was assessed before and within 3 days postprocedure and at 30 days and 6 months postprocedure. Angiography was performed pre- and postprocedure, and carotid duplex scans were performed at baseline and at 30 days and 6 months.
RESULTS: Fifty-two carotid procedures were performed in 51 patients (mean age, 69 years; 84% of patients were men). The major adverse event (MAE) rate (death, stroke, and myocardial infarction [MI]) at 30 days was 5.9%: 2 strokes and a single death from periprocedural MI. MAE rates after 6 and 12 months were 5.9% and 11.8%, respectively. The delivery success rate was 94.2% (49/52) for the Interceptor Filter System and 95.9% (47/49) for the Exponent Stent. The mean diameter stenosis of the target lesion was reduced from 62.4% preprocedure to 21.2% postprocedure.
CONCLUSION: High delivery success rates were achieved with a low rate of MAE (death, stroke, or MI) in a high-risk population. Treatment of carotid artery disease with the Exponent Carotid Stent combined with distal protection from the Interceptor Filter System is effective and safe.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16611760      PMCID: PMC8134008     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  32 in total

1.  Identification of patients at risk for periprocedural neurological deficits associated with carotid angioplasty and stenting.

Authors:  A I Qureshi; A R Luft; V Janardhan; M F Suri; M Sharma; G Lanzino; A K Wakhloo; L R Guterman; L N Hopkins
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 7.914

2.  How safe is carotid angioplasty and stenting in NASCET-ineligible patients?

Authors:  Z G Nadareishvili; B Bowyer; G Cheung; D W Rowed; R Maggisano; J W Norris
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  Endarterectomy or angioplasty for treatment of carotid stenosis?

Authors:  D Spence; M Eliasziw
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-06-02       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Cerebral protection with filter devices during carotid artery stenting.

Authors:  B Reimers; N Corvaja; S Moshiri; S Saccà; R Albiero; C Di Mario; P Pascotto; A Colombo
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-07-03       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 5.  Early outcome of carotid angioplasty and stenting with and without cerebral protection devices: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Andreas Kastrup; Klaus Gröschel; Hilmar Krapf; Bernhard R Brehm; Johannes Dichgans; Jörg B Schulz
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2003-02-13       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  Carotid artery stenting protected with an emboli containment system.

Authors:  Patrick L Whitlow; Pedro Lylyk; Hugo Londero; Oscar A Mendiz; Klaus Mathias; Horst Jaeger; Juan Parodi; Claudio Schönholz; Jose Milei
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  Association of intraoperative transcranial doppler monitoring variables with stroke from carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  R G Ackerstaff; K G Moons; C J van de Vlasakker; F L Moll; F E Vermeulen; A Algra; M P Spencer
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  Elective stenting of carotid artery stenosis in patients with severe coronary artery disease.

Authors:  J Waigand; C M Gross; F Uhlich; J Krämer; C Tamaschke; P Vogel; F C Luft; R Dietz
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 29.983

9.  Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients.

Authors:  Jay S Yadav; Mark H Wholey; Richard E Kuntz; Pierre Fayad; Barry T Katzen; Gregory J Mishkel; Tanvir K Bajwa; Patrick Whitlow; Neil E Strickman; Michael R Jaff; Jeffrey J Popma; David B Snead; Donald E Cutlip; Brian G Firth; Kenneth Ouriel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis.

Authors:  H J M Barnett; D W Taylor; R B Haynes; D L Sackett; S J Peerless; G G Ferguson; A J Fox; R N Rankin; V C Hachinski; D O Wiebers; M Eliasziw
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-08-15       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  7 in total

1.  New ischemic brain lesions on diffusion-weighted MRI after carotid artery stenting with filter protection: frequency and relationship with plaque morphology.

Authors:  D Stojanov; M Ilic; P Bosnjakovic; M Zivkovic; S Jolic; N Vukasinovic; A Ignjatovic; B Ilic; D Benedeto-Stojanov
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Cerebral ischemia after filter-protected carotid artery stenting is common and cannot be predicted by the presence of substantial amount of debris captured by the filter device.

Authors:  G Maleux; P Demaerel; E Verbeken; K Daenens; S Heye; F Van Sonhoven; A Nevelsteen; G Wilms
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Carotid revascularization using endarterectomy or stenting systems (CaRESS): 4-year outcomes.

Authors:  Christopher K Zarins; Rodney A White; Edward B Diethrich; Rebecca J Shackelton; Flora S Siami
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.487

Review 4.  Carotid artery stenting versus endarterectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Amir Gahremanpour; Emerson C Perin; Guilherme Silva
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2012

5.  Captured Macro-embolus of Fractured Atheromatous Plaque by the Embolic Protection Device during Carotid Stent Assisted Angioplasty.

Authors:  Mun Chul Kim; Shelby Bennett; Richard Farb; Sydney Croul; Seon-Kyu Lee
Journal:  Neurointervention       Date:  2013-02-28

6.  Cerebral ischemia detected with diffusion-weighted MR imaging after protected carotid artery stenting: comparison of distal balloon and filter device.

Authors:  Suk Jung Kim; Hong Gee Roh; Pyoung Jeon; Keon Ha Kim; Kwang Ho Lee; Hong Sik Byun; Won Jin Moon; Gyeong Moon Kim; Young Wook Kim; Dong Ik Kim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 7.  Clinical Outcomes of Second- versus First-Generation Carotid Stents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Adam Mazurek; Krzysztof Malinowski; Kenneth Rosenfield; Laura Capoccia; Francesco Speziale; Gianmarco de Donato; Carlo Setacci; Christian Wissgott; Pasqualino Sirignano; Lukasz Tekieli; Andrey Karpenko; Waclaw Kuczmik; Eugenio Stabile; David Christopher Metzger; Max Amor; Adnan H Siddiqui; Antonio Micari; Piotr Pieniążek; Alberto Cremonesi; Joachim Schofer; Andrej Schmidt; Piotr Musialek
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 4.964

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.