Literature DB >> 10657409

Identification of patients at risk for periprocedural neurological deficits associated with carotid angioplasty and stenting.

A I Qureshi1, A R Luft, V Janardhan, M F Suri, M Sharma, G Lanzino, A K Wakhloo, L R Guterman, L N Hopkins.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Transient or permanent neurological deficits can occur in the periprocedural period following carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS), presumably due to distal embolization and/or hemodynamic compromise. We performed this study to identify predictors of neurological deficits associated with carotid angioplasty and stent placement.
METHODS: We reviewed medical records and angiograms in a consecutive series of patients who underwent CAS for symptomatic or asymptomatic cervical internal carotid artery stenosis from June 1996 through December 1998. Using logistic regression analysis, we evaluated the effect of demographic, clinical, intraprocedural, and angiographic risk factors on subsequent development of periprocedural neurological deficits. Periprocedural neurological deficits were defined as new or worsening transient or permanent neurological deficits that occurred during or within 48 hours of the procedure.
RESULTS: A total of 111 patients (mean age 68.2+/-9.1 years) who underwent CAS for asymptomatic (n=54) or symptomatic (n=57) stenoses were included in this study. A total of 14 periprocedural neurological deficits (13%) were observed either during (n=4) or after (n=10) the procedure. Three identified variables were independently associated with periprocedural neurological deficits: symptomatic lesion (OR 8.3, 95% CI 1.6 to 42.6), length of stenotic segment >/=11.2 mm (OR 5.2, 95% CI 1.2 to 22.5), and absence of hypercholesterolemia (OR 5.4, 95% CI 1.4 to 20.9). Other variables, including age and degree of stenosis (defined by NASCET criteria), were not associated with periprocedural neurological deficits.
CONCLUSIONS: A combination of clinical and angiographic variables can be used to identify patients at risk for periprocedural neurological deficits after CAS. Such identification may help in selection of patients who may benefit from novel pharmacological and mechanical preventive approaches.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10657409     DOI: 10.1161/01.str.31.2.376

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  14 in total

Review 1.  Cerebrovascular angioplasty and stenting for the prevention of stroke.

Authors:  J C Chaloupka; J B Weigele; S Mangla; W S Lesley
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.081

2.  The use of balloon-expandable stents in the management of intracranial arterial diseases: a 5-year single-center experience.

Authors:  Iruena Moraes Kessler; Charbel Mounayer; Michel Piotin; Laurent Spelle; Jose Ricardo Vanzin; Jacques Moret
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Carotid intervention 3: the evidence for cerebral protection.

Authors:  Fabrizio Fanelli; Mario Bezzi; Emanuele Boatta; Roberto Passariello
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 4.  Clinical Presentation, Imaging, and Management of Complications due to Neurointerventional Procedures.

Authors:  Matthew C Davis; John P Deveikis; Mark R Harrigan
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.513

5.  Factors Associated with Increased Rates of Post-procedural Stroke or Death following Carotid Artery Stent Placement: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Muhib Khan; Adnan I Qureshi
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Neurol       Date:  2014-05

6.  Prospective analysis of cerebral infarction after carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stent placement by using diffusion-weighted imaging.

Authors:  Hong Gee Roh; Hong Sik Byun; Jae Wook Ryoo; Dong Gyu Na; Won-Jin Moon; Byung Boong Lee; Dong-Ik Kim
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  The strategy for internal carotid stenosis with thrombus.

Authors:  O Masuo; T Terada; M Tsuura; H Matsumoto; H Okada; Y Oura; Y Nakamura; T Kido; K Nakai; T Itakura
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 1.610

8.  Prognostic Factors for Neurologic Outcome in Patients with Carotid Artery Stenting.

Authors:  Chi-Sheng Hung; Mao-Shin Lin; Ying-Hsien Chen; Ching-Chang Huang; Hung-Yuan Li; Hsien-Li Kao
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.672

9.  Thalamic hemorrhage following carotid angioplasty and stenting.

Authors:  Jonathan A Friedman; David F Kallmes; Eelco F M Wijdicks
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2004-04-20       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 10.  Indications for carotid artery surgery and stent: the role of carotid ultrasound.

Authors:  Yong Jae Kim; Charles H Tegeler
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.931

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.