Literature DB >> 16611725

Navicular stress fractures: outcomes of surgical and conservative management.

N J Potter1, P D Brukner, M Makdissi, K Crossley, Z S Kiss, C Bradshaw.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the long term outcomes of the two treatment options for navicular stress fractures: non-weightbearing cast immobilisation and surgical fixation.
DESIGN: Retrospective case study. PARTICIPANTS: Subjects aged 18 years and older who had been treated for a navicular stress fracture more than two years previously. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Questionnaire based analogue pain score and function score; tenderness on palpation; abnormality detected on computed tomography (CT).
RESULTS: In all, 32 fractures in 26 subjects were investigated. No significant differences were found between surgical and conservative management for current pain (p = 0.984), current function (p = 0.170), or abnormality on CT (p = 0.173). However, surgically treated patients more often remained tender over the "N spot" (p = 0.005), even after returning to competition for two years or more.
CONCLUSIONS: Surgical fixation of navicular stress fractures appears to be as effective as conservative management over the longer term. However, there remains a small but measurable degree of pain and loss of function over this period. The value of using "N spot" tenderness as the sole clinical predictor of treatment success requires further investigation, as some patients remained tender despite successful completion of treatment and return to competition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16611725      PMCID: PMC2579456          DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.2005.022079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Sports Med        ISSN: 0306-3674            Impact factor:   13.800


  9 in total

1.  The incidence and distribution of stress fractures in competitive track and field athletes. A twelve-month prospective study.

Authors:  K L Bennell; S A Malcolm; S A Thomas; J D Wark; P D Brukner
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1996 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes.

Authors:  H B Kitaoka; I J Alexander; R S Adelaar; J A Nunley; M S Myerson; M Sanders
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.827

3.  Stress fractures of the tarsal navicular. A retrospective review of twenty-one cases.

Authors:  J S Torg; H Pavlov; L H Cooley; M H Bryant; S P Arnoczky; J Bergfeld; L Y Hunter
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Fatigue fracture of the tarsal navicular.

Authors:  L C Towne; M E Blazina; L N Cozen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Results of treatment of 22 navicular stress fractures and a new proposed radiographic classification system.

Authors:  A Saxena; B Fullem; D Hannaford
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Surg       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.286

6.  Stress fractures: a review of 180 cases.

Authors:  P Brukner; C Bradshaw; K M Khan; S White; K Crossley
Journal:  Clin J Sport Med       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.638

7.  Tarsal navicular stress fracture in athletes.

Authors:  K M Khan; P D Brukner; C Kearney; P J Fuller; C J Bradshaw; Z S Kiss
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  Outcome of conservative and surgical management of navicular stress fracture in athletes. Eighty-six cases proven with computerized tomography.

Authors:  K M Khan; P J Fuller; P D Brukner; C Kearney; H C Burry
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Stress fractures of the tarsal navicular bone: CT findings in 55 cases.

Authors:  Z S Kiss; K M Khan; P J Fuller
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 3.959

  9 in total
  5 in total

1.  Delayed healing of a navicular stress fracture, following limited weight-bearing activity.

Authors:  Matthew Robinson; Mark Fulcher
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2014-03-11

2.  The non-surgical and surgical treatment of tarsal navicular stress fractures.

Authors:  John R Fowler; John P Gaughan; Barry P Boden; Helene Pavlov; Joseph S Torg
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Epidemiology of Navicular Injury at the NFL Combine and Their Impact on an Athlete's Prospective NFL Career.

Authors:  Bryan Vopat; Brendin R Beaulieu-Jones; Gregory Waryasz; Kevin J McHale; George Sanchez; Catherine A Logan; James M Whalen; Christopher W DiGiovanni; Matthew T Provencher
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2017-08-18

4.  Foot Kinematics Differ Between Runners With and Without a History of Navicular Stress Fractures.

Authors:  James Becker; Stanley James; Louis Osternig; Li-Shan Chou
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2018-04-20

Review 5.  Return to sport following navicular stress fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis of three hundred and fifteen fractures.

Authors:  Ahmed Khalil Attia; Karim Mahmoud; Jason Bariteau; Sameh A Labib; Christopher W DiGiovanni; Pieter D'Hooghe
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 3.075

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.