Literature DB >> 1456359

Outcome of conservative and surgical management of navicular stress fracture in athletes. Eighty-six cases proven with computerized tomography.

K M Khan1, P J Fuller, P D Brukner, C Kearney, H C Burry.   

Abstract

Eighty-two athletes with 86 clinical navicular stress fractures, all imaged with computerized tomography, were followed for an average of 33 months (range, 6 to 108) after diagnosis. Initial treatment consisted of at least 6 weeks of nonweightbearing cast immobilization for 22 fractures, at least 6 weeks of limitation of activity with continued weightbearing for 34 fractures, and a period of less than 6 weeks of conservative treatment for another 19 fractures. Five patients attempted to continue playing sports. Six patients had immediate surgery. Nineteen of 22 patients (86%) who had initial non-weightbearing cast immobilization treatment returned to sports, compared with only 9 of 34 patients (26%) who initially continued weightbearing with limited activity (P < 0.001). After failure of the latter treatment, successful outcomes were seen for 6 of 7 patients (86%) treated with nonweightbearing cast immobilization, while 11 of 15 patients (73%) who had one surgical procedure were able to return to sports. These results indicate that nonweightbearing cast immobilization is the treatment of choice for navicular stress fractures. Also, this treatment compares favorably with surgical treatment for patients who present after failed weightbearing treatments. Computerized tomographic appearances of healing fractures do not necessarily mirror clinical union, and postimmobilization management should be monitored clinically.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1456359     DOI: 10.1177/036354659202000606

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  19 in total

Review 1.  [Stress fractures of the tarsal navicular bone. Causality, diagnosis, therapy, prophylaxis].

Authors:  G M Ivanic; T Juranitsch; M S Myerson; H J Trnka
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Imaging studies for diagnosing stress and insufficiency fractures.

Authors:  E A Brandser; J A Buckwalter
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  1996

Review 3.  Stress fractures of the foot and ankle, part 2: site-specific etiology, imaging, and treatment, and differential diagnosis.

Authors:  Jacob C Mandell; Bharti Khurana; Stacy E Smith
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-03-25       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Delayed healing of a navicular stress fracture, following limited weight-bearing activity.

Authors:  Matthew Robinson; Mark Fulcher
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2014-03-11

Review 5.  Stress fractures. Current concepts of diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  M T Reeder; B H Dick; J K Atkins; A B Pribis; J M Martinez
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  Does pulsed low intensity ultrasound allow early return to normal activities when treating stress fractures? A review of one tarsal navicular and eight tibial stress fractures.

Authors:  J C Brand; T Brindle; J Nyland; D N Caborn; D L Johnson
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  1999

Review 7.  Tarsal navicular stress fractures.

Authors:  Rachel J Shakked; Emily E Walters; Martin J O'Malley
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2017-03

Review 8.  Overuse injuries in classical ballet.

Authors:  K Khan; J Brown; S Way; N Vass; K Crichton; R Alexander; A Baxter; M Butler; J Wark
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 11.136

9.  Tarsal navicular stress fracture in athletes.

Authors:  K M Khan; P D Brukner; C Kearney; P J Fuller; C J Bradshaw; Z S Kiss
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  Bilateral foot pain in a collegiate distance runner.

Authors:  C R Denegar; B J Siple
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.