Literature DB >> 16610921

Toward evidence-based assessment for coverage and reimbursement of laboratory-based diagnostic and genetic tests.

Scott D Ramsey1, David L Veenstra, Louis P Garrison, Rick Carlson, Paul Billings, Josh Carlson, Sean D Sullivan.   

Abstract

Despite the pervasiveness of laboratory tests and their importance to medicine, evidence for their appropriate use often is very limited. In this article, we argue for a fundamental restructuring of the process by which laboratory tests are evaluated and reimbursed. We present an approach that would promote more evidence- based appraisals for laboratory tests. In addition, we urge that coverage and reimbursement for laboratory tests move toward an evidence- and value-based approach, using the tools that largely have been adopted for pharmaceuticals by many US healthcare payers. To address this information gap for laboratory tests, we note several potential strategies to encourage manufacturers, laboratory service providers, and payers to collect outcome and cost data that will better support effective use of new laboratory tests. Integral to increasing appropriate use and reimbursement will be the development of a common language and format for dialogue--facilitating the development, review, and delivery of evidence-based tests by manufacturers, clinical laboratories, and healthcare payers.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16610921

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Manag Care        ISSN: 1088-0224            Impact factor:   2.229


  7 in total

1.  Pharmacogenomics, evidence, and the role of payers.

Authors:  P A Deverka
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 2.000

Review 2.  Economic Evidence and Point-of-Care Testing.

Authors:  Andrew St John; Christopher P Price
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2013-08

3.  [Diagnostic studies].

Authors:  Rosemarie Felder-Puig; Philipp Mad; Gerald Gartlehner
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2009

4.  Paying for personalized care: cancer biomarkers and comparative effectiveness.

Authors:  Rahber Thariani; David L Veenstra; Josh J Carlson; Louis P Garrison; Scott Ramsey
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 6.603

5.  Eligibility criteria in private and public coverage policies for BRCA genetic testing and genetic counseling.

Authors:  Grace Wang; Mary S Beattie; Ninez A Ponce; Kathryn A Phillips
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 8.822

6.  A formal risk-benefit framework for genomic tests: facilitating the appropriate translation of genomics into clinical practice.

Authors:  David L Veenstra; Joshua A Roth; Louis P Garrison; Scott D Ramsey; Wylie Burke
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 7.  Defining the spectrum of genome policy.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga; Huntington F Willard
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 53.242

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.