Literature DB >> 16610566

The evolution of ureteroscopy: a modern single-institution series.

Amy E Krambeck1, Francois J Murat, Matthew T Gettman, George K Chow, David E Patterson, Joseph W Segura.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate a modern ureteroscopy series, including the use of new technological advances, operative procedures, and potential complications, at a single institution and to compare our current experience with our prior published series and the current literature.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 1000 consecutive ureteroscopies performed in 961 patients from December 1999 to February 2003 at our institution.
RESULTS: Semirigid and flexible ureteroscopes were used in 60.3% and 37.0% of the cases, respectively. In 2.6% of cases, a combination of both rigid and flexible ureteroscopes was required. The most common indications for ureteroscopy were as follows: stone, 57.9%; diagnostic, 20.6%; and urothelial carcinoma, 12.6%. Of the stones treated, 31.8% were proximal or middle and 59.1% distal. The overall, proximal, and distal stone-free rates were 91.7%, 87.3%, and 94.2%, respectively. Average operative time was 81 minutes (range, 5-280 minutes). Average follow-up was 2.36 months (range, 1-24 months). The overall complication rate was 1.9% (18/961), including a 0.2% (2/961) incidence of ureteral strictures.
CONCLUSION: Current practice trends have shifted to an increased use of flexible ureteroscopes and more frequent ureteroscopic treatment of proximal calculi. Our single treatment stone-free rates are competitive with quoted shock wave lithotripsy success. In addition, there has been a decrease in ureteroscopic-associated complications in our series, with no ureteral avulsions. The improvements in treatment success and decrease in complications may be secondary to advances in ureteroscopic technology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16610566     DOI: 10.4065/81.4.468

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc        ISSN: 0025-6196            Impact factor:   7.616


  14 in total

1.  Simulation of Laser Lithotripsy-Induced Heating in the Urinary Tract.

Authors:  Adam D Maxwell; Brian MacConaghy; Jonathan D Harper; Ali H Aldoukhi; Timothy L Hall; William W Roberts
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 2.942

2.  Full-length ureteral avulsion caused by ureteroscopy: report of one case cured by pyeloureterostomy, greater omentum investment, and ureterovesical anastomosis.

Authors:  Peng Gao; Jin Zhu; Yibin Zhou; Yuxi Shan
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  [Influence of ureter stenting before ureterorenoscopic treatment of ureteral calculi].

Authors:  J Mueller; N Riechert-Mühe; A J Schrader; A Leitenberger; J Steinestel; M A Kuczyk; S Steffens; R Hofmann; J Sotelino
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Evaluation of risk factors and treatment options in patients with ureteral stricture disease at a single institution.

Authors:  Henry Tran; Olga Arsovska; Ryan F Paterson; Ben H Chew
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  A prospective trial on ureteral stenting combined with secondary ureteroscopy after an initial failed procedure.

Authors:  Changwei Ji; Weidong Gan; Hongqian Guo; Huibo Lian; Shiwei Zhang; Rong Yang; Xiaozhi Zhao
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2012-04-12

6.  Safety and efficacy of sequential balloon dilation prior to ureteral access sheath insertion in nonstented patients undergoing ureteroscopy.

Authors:  Amr Elmekresh; Lawrence Tsai; Victor Villarreal; Zain Hyder; Patrick S Lowry; Marawan M El Tayeb
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2021-11-19

7.  Is routine ureteral stenting necessary after uncomplicated ureteroscopic lithotripsy for lower ureteral stones larger than 1 cm?

Authors:  Kenan Isen; Isen Kenan; Salih Bogatekin; Bogatekin Salih; Suat Em; Em Suat; Huseyin Ergin; Ergin Huseyin; Vehbi Kilic; Kilic Vehbi
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2008-04-02

Review 8.  Ureteroscopy for the management of stone disease.

Authors:  Brian H Eisner; Michael P Kurtz; Stephen P Dretler
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 14.432

9.  Ureteroscopic lithotripsy in Trendelenburg position for proximal ureteral calculi: a prospective, randomized, comparative study.

Authors:  Jiahua Pan; Wei Xue; Lei Xia; Hai Zhong; Yinchao Zhu; Zhebin Du; Qi Chen; Yiran Huang
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 2.370

10.  Lower pole calculi larger than one centimeter: Retrograde intrarenal surgery.

Authors:  Andreas J Gross; Thorsten Bach
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2008-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.