Literature DB >> 16609858

Quantifier variables of the back surface deformity obtained with a noninvasive structured light method: evaluation of their usefulness in idiopathic scoliosis diagnosis.

María Fe Mínguez1, Mateo Buendía, Rosa M Cibrián, Rosario Salvador, Manuel Laguía, Antonio Martín, Francisco Gomar.   

Abstract

New noninvasive techniques, amongst them structured light methods, have been applied to study rachis deformities, providing a way to evaluate external back deformities in the three planes of space. These methods are aimed at reducing the number of radiographic examinations necessary to diagnose and follow-up patients with scoliosis. By projecting a grid over the patient's back, the corresponding software for image treatment provides a topography of the back in a color or gray scale. Visual inspection of back topographic images using this method immediately provides information about back deformity, but it is important to determine quantifier variables of the deformity to establish diagnostic criteria. In this paper, two topographic variables [deformity in the axial plane index (DAPI) and posterior trunk symmetry index (POTSI)] that quantify deformity in two different planes are analyzed. Although other authors have reported the POTSI variable, the DAPI variable proposed in this paper is innovative. The upper normality limit of these variables in a nonpathological group was determined. These two variables have different and complementary diagnostic characteristics, therefore we devised a combined diagnostic criterion: cases with normal DAPI and POTSI (DAPI < or = 3.9% and POTSI < or = 27.5%) were diagnosed as nonpathologic, but cases with high DAPI or POTSI were diagnosed as pathologic. When we used this criterion to analyze all the cases in the sample (56 nonpathologic and 30 with idiopathic scoliosis), we obtained 76.6% sensitivity, 91% specificity, and a positive predictive value of 82%. The interobserver, intraobserver, and interassay variability were studied by determining the variation coefficient. There was good correlation between topographic variables (DAPI and POTSI) and clinical variables (Cobb's angle and vertebral rotation angle).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16609858      PMCID: PMC2198893          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-006-0079-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  14 in total

Review 1.  School screening for scoliosis.

Authors:  R T Morrissy
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  Assessing the child with scoliosis: the role of surface topography.

Authors:  N J Oxborrow
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.791

3.  Effects of trunk position on back surface-contour measured by raster stereophotography.

Authors:  Xue C Liu; John G Thometz; Roger M Lyon; Linda McGrady
Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)       Date:  2002-07

4.  Early detection of progression in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis by measurement of changes in back shape with the Integrated Shape Imaging System scanner.

Authors:  T N Theologis; J C Fairbank; A R Turner-Smith; T Pantazopoulos
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Moiré topography.

Authors:  H Takasaki
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  1973-04-01       Impact factor: 1.980

6.  A study of the diagnostic accuracy and reliability of the Scoliometer and Adam's forward bend test.

Authors:  P Côté; B G Kreitz; J D Cassidy; A K Dzus; J Martel
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  A television/computer three-dimensional surface shape measurement system.

Authors:  A R Turner-Smith
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Assessment of accuracy of the scoliosis school screening examination.

Authors:  G R Viviani; L Budgell; C Dok; P Tugwell
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Quantitation of three-dimensional deformity of idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  T Kojima; T Kurokawa
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Nonstandard vertebral rotation in scoliosis screening patients. Its prevalence and relation to the clinical deformity.

Authors:  G W Armstrong; N B Livermore; N Suzuki; J G Armstrong
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1982 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  9 in total

1.  Do postoperative radiographically verified technical success, improved cosmesis, and trunk shift corroborate with patient-reported outcomes in Lenke 1C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?

Authors:  Shallu Sharma; Cody Eric Bünger; Thomas Andersen; Haolin Sun; Chunsen Wu; Ebbe Stender Hansen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  A review of the trunk surface metrics used as Scoliosis and other deformities evaluation indices.

Authors:  Petros Patias; Theodoros B Grivas; Angelos Kaspiris; Costas Aggouris; Evangelos Drakoutos
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2010-06-29

3.  Validity and reliability of photographic measures to evaluate waistline asymmetry in idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Antonia Matamalas; Juan Bagó; Elisabetta D Agata; Ferran Pellisé
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  A descriptive analysis of abnormal postural patterns in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Malgorzata E Domagalska; Andrzej J Szopa; Darius T Lembert
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2011-02

5.  Exemplification of Movement Patterns and Their Influence on Body Posture in Younger School-Age Children on the Basis of an Authorial Program "I Take Care of My Spine".

Authors:  Anna Brzek; Ryszard Plinta
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  Correlation between Topographic Parameters Obtained by Back Surface Topography Based on Structured Light and Radiographic Variables in the Assessment of Back Morphology in Young Patients with Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Authors:  Laura Pino-Almero; María Fe Mínguez-Rey; Rosa María Cibrián-Ortiz de Anda; María Rosario Salvador-Palmer; Salvador Sentamans-Segarra
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2017-04-12

7.  Methodology of evaluation of morphology of the spine and the trunk in idiopathic scoliosis and other spinal deformities - 6th SOSORT consensus paper.

Authors:  Tomasz Kotwicki; Stefano Negrini; Theodoros B Grivas; Manuel Rigo; Toru Maruyama; Jacek Durmala; Fabio Zaina
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2009-11-26

8.  Discrepancy in clinical versus radiological parameters describing deformity due to brace treatment for moderate idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Tomasz Kotwicki; Edyta Kinel; Wanda Stryla; Andrzej Szulc
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2007-12-03

9.  Examination of the compatibility of the photogrammetric method with the phenomenon of mora projection in the evaluation of scoliosis.

Authors:  Justyna Drzał-Grabiec; Sławomir Snela; Justyna Podgórska-Bednarz; Justyna Rykała; Agnieszka Banaś
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 3.411

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.