Literature DB >> 16608059

On measuring the change in size of pulmonary nodules.

Anthony P Reeves1, Antoni B Chan, David F Yankelevitz, Claudia I Henschke, Bryan Kressler, William J Kostis.   

Abstract

The pulmonary nodule is the most common manifestation of lung cancer, the most deadly of all cancers. Most small pulmonary nodules are benign, however, and currently the growth rate of the nodule provides for one of the most accurate noninvasive methods of determining malignancy. In this paper, we present methods for measuring the change in nodule size from two computed tomography image scans recorded at different times; from this size change the growth rate may be established. The impact of partial voxels for small nodules is evaluated and isotropic resampling is shown to improve measurement accuracy. Methods for nodule location and sizing, pleural segmentation, adaptive thresholding, image registration, and knowledge-based shape matching are presented. The latter three techniques provide for a significant improvement in volume change measurement accuracy by considering both image scans simultaneously. Improvements in segmentation are evaluated by measuring volume changes in benign or slow growing nodules. In the analysis of 50 nodules, the variance in percent volume change was reduced from 11.54% to 9.35% (p = 0.03) through the use of registration, adaptive thresholding, and knowledge-based shape matching.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16608059     DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2006.871548

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging        ISSN: 0278-0062            Impact factor:   10.048


  44 in total

1.  Shape "break-and-repair" strategy and its application to automated medical image segmentation.

Authors:  Jiantao Pu; David S Paik; Xin Meng; Justus E Roos; Geoffrey D Rubin
Journal:  IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.579

2.  Differential geometry-based techniques for characterization of boundary roughness of pulmonary nodules in CT images.

Authors:  Ashis Kumar Dhara; Sudipta Mukhopadhyay; Pramit Saha; Mandeep Garg; Niranjan Khandelwal
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  The Lung Image Database Consortium (LIDC): a comparison of different size metrics for pulmonary nodule measurements.

Authors:  Anthony P Reeves; Alberto M Biancardi; Tatiyana V Apanasovich; Charles R Meyer; Heber MacMahon; Edwin J R van Beek; Ella A Kazerooni; David Yankelevitz; Michael F McNitt-Gray; Geoffrey McLennan; Samuel G Armato; Claudia I Henschke; Denise R Aberle; Barbara Y Croft; Laurence P Clarke
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.173

4.  The effect of lung volume on nodule size on CT.

Authors:  Iva Petkovska; Matthew S Brown; Jonathan G Goldin; Hyun J Kim; Michael F McNitt-Gray; Fereidoun G Abtin; Raffi J Ghurabi; Denise R Aberle
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  Pulmonary nodule registration in serial CT scans based on rib anatomy and nodule template matching.

Authors:  Jiazheng Shi; Berkman Sahiner; Heang-Ping Chan; Lubomir Hadjiiski; Chuan Zhou; Philip N Cascade; Naama Bogot; Ella A Kazerooni; Yi-Ta Wu; Jun Wei
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 6.  Noncalcified lung nodules: volumetric assessment with thoracic CT.

Authors:  Marios A Gavrielides; Lisa M Kinnard; Kyle J Myers; Nicholas Petrick
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  A comparison of ground truth estimation methods.

Authors:  Alberto M Biancardi; Artit C Jirapatnakul; Anthony P Reeves
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 2.924

8.  3D shape analysis to reduce false positives for lung nodule detection systems.

Authors:  Antonio Oseas de Carvalho Filho; Aristófanes Corrêa Silva; Anselmo Cardoso de Paiva; Rodolfo Acatauassú Nunes; Marcelo Gattass
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 2.602

9.  Quantitative imaging to assess tumor response to therapy: common themes of measurement, truth data, and error sources.

Authors:  Charles R Meyer; Samuel G Armato; Charles P Fenimore; Geoffrey McLennan; Luc M Bidaut; Daniel P Barboriak; Marios A Gavrielides; Edward F Jackson; Michael F McNitt-Gray; Paul E Kinahan; Nicholas Petrick; Binsheng Zhao
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.243

Review 10.  The importance of the regimen of screening in maximizing the benefit and minimizing the harms.

Authors:  Claudia I Henschke; Kunwei Li; Rowena Yip; Mary Salvatore; David F Yankelevitz
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.