Literature DB >> 16606498

Money as tool, money as drug: the biological psychology of a strong incentive.

Stephen E G Lea1, Paul Webley.   

Abstract

Why are people interested in money? Specifically, what could be the biological basis for the extraordinary incentive and reinforcing power of money, which seems to be unique to the human species? We identify two ways in which a commodity which is of no biological significance in itself can become a strong motivator. The first is if it is used as a tool, and by a metaphorical extension this is often applied to money: it is used instrumentally, in order to obtain biologically relevant incentives. Second, substances can be strong motivators because they imitate the action of natural incentives but do not produce the fitness gains for which those incentives are instinctively sought. The classic examples of this process are psychoactive drugs, but we argue that the drug concept can also be extended metaphorically to provide an account of money motivation. From a review of theoretical and empirical literature about money, we conclude that (i) there are a number of phenomena that cannot be accounted for by a pure Tool Theory of money motivation; (ii) supplementing Tool Theory with a Drug Theory enables the anomalous phenomena to be explained; and (iii) the human instincts that, according to a Drug Theory, money parasitizes include trading (derived from reciprocal altruism) and object play.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16606498     DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X06009046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Sci        ISSN: 0140-525X            Impact factor:   12.579


  32 in total

1.  Gambling motivations, money-limiting strategies, and precommitment preferences of problem versus non-problem gamblers.

Authors:  Lia Nower; Alex Blaszczynski
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2010-09

Review 2.  Overview of special sub-section on money management articles: cross-disciplinary perspectives on money management by addicts.

Authors:  Marc I Rosen
Journal:  Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 3.829

3.  Testing an Incentive-Sensitisation Approach to Understanding Problem Slot-Machine Gambling Using an Online Slot-Machine Simulation.

Authors:  Belinda Davey; Robert Cummins
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2018-09

Review 4.  The evolutionary roots of human decision making.

Authors:  Laurie R Santos; Alexandra G Rosati
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2015-01-03       Impact factor: 24.137

5.  Secondary rewards acquire enhanced incentive motivation via increasing anticipatory activity of the lateral orbitofrontal cortex.

Authors:  X Yang; X Liu; Y Zeng; R Wu; W Zhao; F Xin; S Yao; K M Kendrick; R P Ebstein; B Becker
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 3.270

Review 6.  Non-human primate token use shows possibilities but also limitations for establishing a form of currency.

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Audrey E Parrish
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Quantity-quality trade-off in the acquisition of token preference by capuchin monkeys (Sapajus spp.).

Authors:  E Quintiero; S Gastaldi; F De Petrillo; E Addessi; S Bourgeois-Gironde
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Neural correlates of time versus money in product evaluation.

Authors:  Sebastian Lehmann; Martin Reimann
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-10-01

Review 9.  A new perspective on human reward research: how consciously and unconsciously perceived reward information influences performance.

Authors:  Claire M Zedelius; Harm Veling; Ruud Custers; Erik Bijleveld; Kimberly S Chiew; Henk Aarts
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.526

10.  When unconscious rewards boost cognitive task performance inefficiently: the role of consciousness in integrating value and attainability information.

Authors:  Claire M Zedelius; Harm Veling; Henk Aarts
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.