Literature DB >> 16604511

Quantitative analysis of allele imbalance supports atypical ductal hyperplasia lesions as direct breast cancer precursors.

P S Larson1, A de las Morenas, S R Cerda, S R Bennett, L A Cupples, C L Rosenberg.   

Abstract

It remains unclear whether hyperplastic breast lesions, especially with atypia, are cancer precursors or markers of increased cancer risk. Quantified comparisons of genomic alterations in coexisting lesions could address this question. Therefore, we examined allele imbalance (AI), also known as loss of heterozygosity (LOH), at 20 microsatellite markers on nine chromosome arms, in DNA from 106 samples microdissected from 17 randomly selected cancer-containing breast specimens: 13 simple (DH) and 45 atypical ductal hyperplastic (ADH) lesions, 30 in situ (DCIS) and 18 invasive ductal carcinomas (IDC). Data were analysed using regression models and generalized estimating equations. We found that AI increased as histology became more aberrant and varied with histology across the chromosome arms (p<0.0001). ADH had more AIs on 1q (p=0.03) and 16q (p=0.02) and fewer AIs on 17p (p=0.06) and 17q (p<0.0001) than on other arms. In cancers, AIs remained high on 1q and 16q, and became frequent on 17p and 17q. Concordance between AIs in ADHs and cancers exceeded the 50% expected if the lesions were separate clones in 16/20 (80%) ADHs (p=0.05), from 9/11 (82%) cases (p=0.03), and involved 41/51 (80%) evaluable markers (p=0.05). The occurrence of any AI in ADH predicted greater AI (p=0.009) and possibly lower grade (p=0.05) in coexisting cancers. Nevertheless, ADHs were not genetically identical to cancers or to each other. We found AIs discordant between ADHs and cancers (always on 1q and 16q), AIs unique to ADH (usually on 11q) and some genetic heterogeneity among coexisting ADHs. We conclude that ADH lesions are genetically advanced, with frequent alterations on 1q and 16q, and are often direct cancer precursors. Their global genetic characteristics predict features of cancers in the same breast. Nevertheless, the genetic heterogeneity detected suggests that hyperplasias and cancers may arise on a field at generalized increased cancer risk. Copyright (c) 2006 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16604511     DOI: 10.1002/path.1973

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pathol        ISSN: 0022-3417            Impact factor:   7.996


  20 in total

1.  Tissue proteomics of the human mammary gland: towards an abridged definition of the molecular phenotypes underlying epithelial normalcy.

Authors:  José M A Moreira; Teresa Cabezón; Irina Gromova; Pavel Gromov; Vera Timmermans-Wielenga; Isidro Machado; Antonio Llombart-Bosch; Niels Kroman; Fritz Rank; Julio E Celis
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 6.603

2.  Evaluation of breast amorphous calcifications by a computer-aided detection system in full-field digital mammography.

Authors:  A M Scaranelo; R Eiada; K Bukhanov; P Crystal
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  Aneuploidy: cells losing their balance.

Authors:  Eduardo M Torres; Bret R Williams; Angelika Amon
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  Preinvasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Dennis C Sgroi
Journal:  Annu Rev Pathol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 23.472

5.  Biologic characteristics of premalignant breast disease.

Authors:  Kimberly Cole; Maria Tabernero; Karen S Anderson
Journal:  Cancer Biomark       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.388

6.  Comparative analysis of loss of heterozygosity and expression profile in normal tissue, DCIS and invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Michal Zikan; Jan Bohm; David Pavlista; David Cibula
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.405

7.  Understanding the premalignant potential of atypical hyperplasia through its natural history: a longitudinal cohort study.

Authors:  Lynn C Hartmann; Derek C Radisky; Marlene H Frost; Richard J Santen; Robert A Vierkant; Lorelle L Benetti; Yaman Tarabishy; Karthik Ghosh; Daniel W Visscher; Amy C Degnim
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2014-01-30

8.  Subgross breast pathology in the twenty-first century.

Authors:  William A Smith; James J Going
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 4.064

9.  Triple-modality screening trial for familial breast cancer underlines the importance of magnetic resonance imaging and questions the role of mammography and ultrasound regardless of patient mutation status, age, and breast density.

Authors:  Christopher C Riedl; Nikolaus Luft; Clemens Bernhart; Michael Weber; Maria Bernathova; Muy-Kheng M Tea; Margaretha Rudas; Christian F Singer; Thomas H Helbich
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Early dysregulation of cell adhesion and extracellular matrix pathways in breast cancer progression.

Authors:  Lyndsey A Emery; Anusri Tripathi; Chialin King; Maureen Kavanah; Jane Mendez; Michael D Stone; Antonio de las Morenas; Paola Sebastiani; Carol L Rosenberg
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 4.307

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.