Literature DB >> 16601480

Comparative genomic hybridization and prenatal diagnosis.

Ignatia B Van den Veyver1, Arthur L Beaudet.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH) which detects aneuploidies and submicroscopic deletions and duplications in one assay is now offered for genetic diagnosis in children and adults. Its application to prenatal diagnosis is still limited, but very promising. We predict that array-CGH on fetal DNA obtained through amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling and in the future possibly through noninvasive collection from the maternal cervix or blood, will transform the practice of prenatal diagnosis. RECENT
FINDINGS: The power of array-CGH for genetic diagnosis and gene discovery is supported by recent studies. Most arrays for clinical use carry large DNA fragments, but alternative designs containing oligonucleotides will move into the clinic. Some oligonucleotide arrays can simultaneously analyze DNA copy number and single nucleotide polymorphisms, thereby adding potential assessment of uniparental disomy and paternity. Recent array-CGH studies have revealed extensive interindividual copy number variation of genomic segments, unanticipated complexity of apparently balanced translocations, and new phenotypes associated with DNA deletions and duplications. These observations affect counseling for prenatal diagnosis by array-CGH.
SUMMARY: We believe that array-CGH will be embraced as a tool for prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal defects, but its introduction into clinical practice should proceed with caution by experienced laboratories.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16601480     DOI: 10.1097/01.gco.0000192986.22718.cc

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 1040-872X            Impact factor:   1.927


  8 in total

1.  The future of neo-eugenics. Now that many people approve the elimination of certain genetically defective fetuses, is society closer to screening all fetuses for all known mutations?

Authors:  Armand Marie Leroi
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 8.807

2.  Non-invasive prenatal testing: ethical issues explored.

Authors:  Antina de Jong; Wybo J Dondorp; Christine E M de Die-Smulders; Suzanne G M Frints; Guido M W R de Wert
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Recommendations for the prevention and treatment of haemolytic disease of the foetus and newborn.

Authors:  Francesco Bennardello; Serelina Coluzzi; Giuseppe Curciarello; Tullia Todros; Stefania Villa
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.443

4.  Genome-wide array-based copy number profiling in human placentas from unexplained stillbirths.

Authors:  R Alan Harris; Francesca Ferrari; Shay Ben-Shachar; Xiaoling Wang; George Saade; Ignatia Van Den Veyver; Fabio Facchinetti; Kjersti Aagaard-Tillery
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 3.050

5.  The 'thousand-dollar genome': an ethical exploration.

Authors:  Wybo J Dondorp; Guido M W R de Wert
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.246

6.  Genomic imbalances in neonates with birth defects: high detection rates by using chromosomal microarray analysis.

Authors:  Xin-Yan Lu; Mai T Phung; Chad A Shaw; Kim Pham; Sarah E Neil; Ankita Patel; Trilochan Sahoo; Carlos A Bacino; Pawel Stankiewicz; Sung-Hae Lee Kang; Seema Lalani; A Craig Chinault; James R Lupski; Sau W Cheung; Arthur L Beaudet
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Prenatal Diagnosis of Combined Maternal 4q Interstitial Deletion and Paternal 15q Microduplication.

Authors:  Francesco Libotte; Marco Fabiani; Katia Margiotti; Antonella Viola; Alvaro Mesoraca; Claudio Giorlandino
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-10-16       Impact factor: 4.096

8.  Prenatal diagnosis of a maternal 7.22-Mb deletion at chromosome 4q32.2q32.3 by SNP array.

Authors:  Pingping Zhang; Yanmei Sun; Ping Huo; Haishen Tian; Jian Gao; Yali Li
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 2.009

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.