Literature DB >> 16600037

Genotyping of Bacillus anthracis strains based on automated capillary 25-loci multiple locus variable-number tandem repeats analysis.

Florigio Lista1, Giovanni Faggioni, Samina Valjevac, Andrea Ciammaruconi, Josée Vaissaire, Claudine le Doujet, Olivier Gorgé, Riccardo De Santis, Alessandra Carattoli, Alessandra Ciervo, Antonio Fasanella, Francesco Orsini, Raffaele D'Amelio, Christine Pourcel, Antonio Cassone, Gilles Vergnaud.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The genome of Bacillus anthracis, the etiological agent of anthrax, is highly monomorphic which makes differentiation between strains difficult. A Multiple Locus Variable-number tandem repeats (VNTR) Analysis (MLVA) assay based on 20 markers was previously described. It has considerable discrimination power, reproducibility, and low cost, especially since the markers proposed can be typed by agarose-gel electrophoresis. However in an emergency situation, faster genotyping and access to representative databases is necessary.
RESULTS: Genotyping of B. anthracis reference strains and isolates from France and Italy was done using a 25 loci MLVA assay combining 21 previously described loci and 4 new ones. DNA was amplified in 4 multiplex PCR reactions and the length of the resulting 25 amplicons was estimated by automated capillary electrophoresis. The results were reproducible and the data were consistent with other gel based methods once differences in mobility patterns were taken into account. Some alleles previously unresolved by agarose gel electrophoresis could be resolved by capillary electrophoresis, thus further increasing the assay resolution. One particular locus, Bams30, is the result of a recombination between a 27 bp tandem repeat and a 9 bp tandem repeat. The analysis of the array illustrates the evolution process of tandem repeats.
CONCLUSION: In a crisis situation of suspected bioterrorism, standardization, speed and accuracy, together with the availability of reference typing data are important issues, as illustrated by the 2001 anthrax letters event. In this report we describe an upgrade of the previously published MLVA method for genotyping of B. anthracis and apply the method to the typing of French and Italian B. anthracis strain collections. The increased number of markers studied compared to reports using only 8 loci greatly improves the discrimination power of the technique. An Italian strain belonging to the B branch was described, and two new branches, D and E, are proposed. Owing to the upgrading achieved here, precise genotyping can now be produced either by automated capillary electrophoresis, or by the more accessible but slower and for some markers slightly less accurate agarose gel methodology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16600037      PMCID: PMC1479350          DOI: 10.1186/1471-2180-6-33

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Microbiol        ISSN: 1471-2180            Impact factor:   3.605


Background

Bacillus anthracis, a spore forming Gram positive bacteria, is the etiological agent of anthrax, a zoonosis with a worldwide distribution. The disease can be transmitted to humans by contact with infected animals or contaminated animal products. In addition to being an occupational disease, limited to farmers and veterinarians, anthrax has received considerable attention and is one of the most feared microorganism with respect to bioterrorism. In 2001, letters containing spores were mailed causing the death of five persons and several cases of cutaneous anthrax [1]. B. anthracis is a member of the Bacillus cereus group, containing Bacillus cereus, Bacillus thuringiensis, Bacillus mycoides and B. anthracis [2]. B. anthracis is characterized by an extremely low genetic variability, making strains differentiation very challenging [3,4]. The importance of strain differentiation of biothreat agents including B. anthracis is increasingly recognized as a way for identifying the source of the attack, as illustrated not only by the 2001 events but also, earlier on, by the Sverdlovsk [5] and Tokyo [6] events. Such events together suggested how crucial is the development of microbial forensics for biosecurity. Measures aimed at limiting the risk of deliberate release of dangerous pathogens, would require that isolates kept in different institutions around the world are precisely genotyped, and that the genotype profiles are shared by all countries having accepted to follow these rules, for strain accountability purposes. Because the molecular methods classically used to differentiate between strains in other species failed to discriminate B. anthracis isolates, new approaches were developed. Using Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism in 79 B. anthracis isolates, 31 polymorphic chromosomal regions were observed out of 1,000 fragments, and eventually, the most interesting polymorphisms turned out to be the result of tandem repeat variations [7]. Tandem repeats variability was studied most extensively in eukaryotes, and was shown to be associated with different aspects of DNA replication and recombination, including replication slippage and double-strand breaks repair [8]. They do not vary by the same mechanisms which are inducing point mutations, and the mutation rate at some Variable Number of Tandem Repeats (VNTR) loci may be considerably higher than nucleotide substitutions [9-11] in an as yet not predictable way [12,13]. The level of intraspecific polymorphism in tandemly repeated sequences varies from one locus to another and needs to be experimentally measured by typing representative strain collections. Approaches based on VNTR analysis (called MLVA for Multiple Locus VNTR Analysis) are now increasingly used to characterize in particular recently emerged, highly monomorphic pathogens including B. anthracis [12,14], Mycobacterium tuberculosis [15], Yersinia pestis [16]Brucella [17] (see [18,19] for a review). Multiple alleles can exist in the population for each tandem repeat locus. One advantage of MLVA typing as compared for instance to SNP (Single Nucleotide Polymorphism) typing is that a new isolate can be compared to previously characterised strains in an unbiased way. One weakness is that the phylogenetic value of MLVA clustering must be carefully checked and validated by using independent approaches with less homoplastic markers [20]. In previous reports, a multilocus VNTR analysis (MLVA8) method was proposed for genotyping of B. anthracis strains, using six chromosomal and two plasmid marker loci (vrrA, vrrB1, vrrB2, vrrC1, vrrC2, CG3, pXO1, pXO2 [14]). In the initial work, an automated fluorescent DNA sequencer was used to determine the size of the PCR fragments and this set of markers is now largely employed for B. anthracis genotyping [21-26]. However, this MLVA8 assay is not sufficient for molecular forensics approaches, the resolution achieved is too limited. For instance the vast majority of French and Italian strains have been assigned to MLVA8 genotypes (GT) 1 and 3 which differ only at one marker, located on one of the two virulence plasmids [14,22,26]. For this reason, additional markers were subsequently developed to produce an MLVA15 panel [11], and the initial clustering nomenclature [14] was revised [20]. Unfortunately none of the corresponding data has been published so far. Le Flèche et al. [12] extended the MLVA8 assay by proposing 14 additional markers (Bams1, 3, 5, 7, 13, 15, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 28, 30, 31), which greatly improved the resolution power of the assay. DNA fragment sizing was achieved on standard agarose gels stained by ethidium bromide, a technique utilising widely accessible, and very basic, equipment. In order to have a more rapid and accurate genotyping system for B. anthracis we propose an automated capillary based method using essentially the panel of loci described by Le Flèche et al [12], with the addition of 4 new markers, and apply the method to collections of strains from Italy and France. We compare the clustering achieved with available epidemiological data for B. anthracis, and introduce two new B. anthracis groups, D and E. The present report deals with the standardization and further improvement of currently available genotyping methods for B. anthracis, the typing of a larger collection of strains, the comparison with available published data, and the enlargement of the publicly accessible databases.

Results

MLVA25 genotyping by capillary electrophoresis

A collection of 160 B. anthracis isolates, comprising strains from Italy and France and a few reference strains were analyzed to generate MLVA typing data. DNA was amplified in 4 multiplex PCR reactions, comprising 25 loci. The loci are 21 markers described previously [12,14] (Bams7 is not currently amenable to capillary electrophoresis typing because of its allele size range and was not included), and the four new markers Bams34, 44, 51, 53 (Table 1). All twenty-five markers can be amplified in only four PCR reactions by taking into account the allele size range for each locus (Table 2). The labelled amplicons were separated on a CEQ 8000 Beckmann DNA analysis system and the electropherograms were analysed by CEQ Fragment Analysis System software to determine the length of the fragments by reference to a 75–1000 bps size ladder (in red on Figure 1). After testing several primer concentrations and ratios, a balanced level of fluorescence peak intensity was obtained by using between 5 to 10 ng of template DNA per multiplex PCR reaction and the concentration of primers indicated (Table 2).
Table 1

Comparison between MLVA8, MLVA20, MLVA25

MLVA8MLVA20MLVA25
pXO1pXO1
pXO2pXO2
vrrAvrrAvrrA
vrrB1vrrB1vrrB1
vrrB2vrrB2vrrB2
vrrC1vrrC1vrrC1
vrrC2vrrC2vrrC2
CG3CG3CG3
bams1bams1
bams3bams3
bams5bams5
bams13bams13
bams15bams15
bams21bams21
bams22bams22
bams23bams23
bams24bams24
bams25bams25
bams28bams28
bams30bams30
bams31bams31
bams34
bams44
bams51
bams53
bams7
Table 2

Composition of the 4 multiplex PCR according to the size range and the different dye label compatibility.

LocusRepeat unitsFragment size range (bps)Number of allelesNew allelesHDGI index (total n = 67)*Primer conc. (μM)
Multiplex ACG3a5153–15820.500.30
bams44a39339–41720.210.30
bams3a15474–609710.510.30
vrrB 2c9135–17140.270.15
bams5c39229–385520.490.30
bams15c9409–6161050.620.60
bams1b21380–48550.540.15
vrrC1 b 9517–61640.420.30
Multiplex Bbams13a39337–8681340.610.30
vrrB1 b 9193–25640.360,10
bams28b24373–493410.350.15
vrrC2 b 18532–60430.400.10
bams53c12212–23620.210.60
bams31c9331–952840.580.60
Multiplex C vrrA a 12290–32640.400.06
bams25a15376–39120.110.15
bams21a45541–67630.090.30
bams34c39238–58150.400.30
bams24b42469–637630.270.30
Multiplex Dbams51b45358–53840.330.60
bams22b36555–735510.340.15
bams23c42399–651520.400.30
bams30a9268–9161240.710.30
pXO1b3123–13550.770.15
pXO2a2132–14580.580.15

The number of diverse allele and new allele are described for the 25 markers. Primer concentration for each set of marker in the multiplex is also reported.

* HGDI (Hunter-Gaston Diversity Index) calculated as in [36]

The alleles are identified with the number of repeats versus the former nomenclature [12]. Locus, locus, locusare loci amplified by a forward primer respectively labeled with cy5.5, cy5 and WellRed dyeD2.

Figure 1

Representative electropherograms after capillary electrophoresis separation of the fragments amplified by 4 multiplex PCR. B. anthracis alleles are showed in blue, green and black peaks, whereas the red peaks are for the molecular weight size standard by Microzone.

The assay was highly reproducible as tested by performing duplicate typings. The intra-experimental (within the same run) as well as the inter-experimental (between runs) variation of fragment sizing showed variations lower than one base over the whole range of PCR fragments investigated here. The accuracy of the data was determined by comparison of observed PCR fragment size to the exact values calculated by direct sequencing and available genome sequence data [27]. In some instances the amplicon size determined after electrophoresis separation did not match the expected values (Table 3). This is well illustrated for instance with Bams30 (Table 3) for which the offset increases with allele size, i.e. repeat copy number. In any case, the offset is conserved, reproducible, and the differences in calculated allele size are consistent with a 9 bp repeat unit variation.
Table 3

Comparison between product sizes inferred by CEQ Fragment Analysis System software (observed) and the actual sizes obtained by sequencing data coming from direct sequencing of the PCR product (expected) or available in Genbank.

MarkerAllele fragment sizesAllelesNote
ExpectedObservedNumber of repeatsas reported [13]
BAMS1 21 bp380386111
401407122
422430133
443451144
485494165
BAMS3 15 bp474475211
519520242
549550263
564565274
579580285new allele, previously defined as 5 or 6
59459529
609611306
BAMS52292313new allele
39 bp30730551
3323295.5new allele
34634362
38538273
BAMS13 9 bp337339171
34634818new allele
364365202
37337221new allele
391393243
427427274
454456305
46346531new allele
48148333new allele
778785667
814821708
841849739
8688767610
BAMS15 9 bp40941223new allele
418422241
44544927new allele
535541372
571579413
58058842new allele, previously defined as 3
589597434
59860644new allele, previously defined as 4 or 5
607616455
61662746new allele
BAMS21 45 bp54153571
63162592
676669103
BAMS22 36 bp555547111
627619132
66365714new allele
699690153
735726164
BAMS23 42 bp3993935new allele
5675599new allele
609600101
63962910.52
651641113
BAMS24 42 bp46947483
5115199new allele
55356210new allele
58259310.5new allele
595603115
637645126
BAMS25 15 bp376380121
391395132
BAMS28 24 bp3733789new allele
397405101
469478132
493502143
BAMS30 9 bp26827061
367369172
493496313
673681514
691698535
727735576
754763607
83584869new allele
85386571new allele
86287472new allele
889902758
91692978new allele
BAMS31 9 bp331332151
63764249new allele
69169755new allele
70070556new allele
727728592
772775643
78178365new allele, previously defined as 3
952955844
BAMS342382353
39 bp3863787
4254218
5034989
58157611
BAMS44 39 bp3393366
4174138
BAMS51 45 bp3583646
4484528
4935019
53854810
BAMS53 12 bp2122136
2362378
vrrA 12 bp29028981
30230192
314314103
326325114
vrrB1 9 bp193194122
220221153
229229164
256256195
vrrB2 9 bp13513741
15315362
16216273
17117084
vrrC1 9 bp517512463
535530484
583574535
616611576
vrrC2 18 bp532528171
568565192
604601213
CG3 5 bp15315511
15816022
pXO1 3 bp1231286
1261317
1291348
1321379
13514010
pXO2 2 bp1321365.5
1331376
1351397
1371418
1391439
14114510
14314711
14514912
Because Bams30 was initially identified as a 27 bp repeat unit marker [12], we investigated representative Bams30 alleles by sequencing (EMBL accession numbers AM182499 to AM182509) in order to clarify this discrepancy. Sequence data indicates that Bams30 alleles are composed of 27 base-pair units at one end of the array, and 9 bp units at the other end. Table 4A provides the allele codes of Bams30 alleles. Repeat units are not identical, different letters are used to code the different variant units which are observed [28]. Uppercase letters code for 27-base-pair repeat units whereas lowercase letters code for 9 base-pair repeat unit. The correspondence between letters and repeat units is indicated in Table 4B. The two regions are variable, and as a result the locus behaves like a 9 bp repeat unit tandem repeat.
Table 4

Bams30 allele codes

Table 4A
GenotypeclusterBams30 allelePCR fragment sizeaobserved sizeaallele codingbc
1A1a75889906 (+17)ABCD EEFGGHGGG IG GJ abcdefcdghdghdefciefjkgk
42A3a75889906 (+17)ABCD EEFGGHGGG IG GJ abcdefcdghdghdefciefjkgk
41A3a75889906 (+17)ABCD EEFGGHGGG IG GJ abcdefcdghdghdefciefjkgk
33A1a75889906 (+17)ABCD EEFGGHGGG IG GJ abcdefcdghdghdefciefjkgk
55D75889906 (+17)ABCD EEFGGHGGG IGLGJ abcdefcdghd efciefjkgk
34A1a72862874 (+12)ABCD EEFGGHGGG IG J abcdefcdghdghdefciefjkgk
37A1a72862874 (+12)ABCD EEFGGHGGG IG J abcdefcdghdghdefciefjkgk
4A1a72862874 (+12)ABCD EEFGGHGGG IG J abcdefcdghdghdefciefjkgk
54A471853865 (+12)ABCD EEFGMHGGG I LGJ ab cdghdghdefciefjkgk
67C71853NDABCD EEFGGHGGGGGI LGJ abcdef ciefjkgk
5A1a69835848 (+13)ABC EFGGHGGG IG GJ abcdefcdghdghdefciefjkgk
58E60754763 (+9)ABCD EEFGG IG IJ abcdefcdghd efciefjkgk
57E60754763 (+9)ABCD EEFGG IG IJ abcdefcdghd efciefjkgk
51A3b57727735 (+8)ABCD EEFGGHG J abcdefcdghd efciefjkgk
53A3b57727NDABCD EEFGGHG J abcdefcdghd efciefjkgk
52A3b53691698 (+7)ABCD EEFGGHG J abcdefcdghd efjkgk
46A3b51673680 (+7)ABCDEEEFG J abcdefcdghd efciefjkgk
48A3b51673681 (+7)ABCDEEEFG J abcdefcdghd efciefjkgk
49A3b31493496 (+3)ABCD EFGGH lj gk
63B217367369 (+2)AB cdghd efjkgk
64B217367369 (+2)AB cdghd efjkgk
66B217367369 (+2)AB cdghd efjkgk
62B217367369 (+2)AB cdghd efjkgk
59B16268270 (+2)AK
CEB9727thuring.ABCDEBGIIIGGGIBJ and ff**ff***fgdgfcafgh**abcdfabciefcfgfjka*
Table 4b
27 bp repeat unit code9 bp repeat unit code
ACAACAGGAATAACGGGAGCAACCGGTGaCAACGGGAG
BCAACAGGAATAACGGGAGCAACAGGTCbACACAGGTC
CCGACGGGAACAACAGGAGCGACCGGTGcTAGCAGGAG
DCGACAGGAATAACGGGAGTGACCGGTGdCAACGGGCC
ECAACAGGAATAACGGGAGTGACCGGTGeCGACAGGAG
FCAACAGGAATAACGGGAGTGACAGGTCfCAACAGGTC
GCGACGGGAATAACGGGAGCAACAGGTCgCAACAGGAG
HCGGCGGGAATAACGGGAGTGACAGGTChATACTGGAG
ICGGCGGGAATAACGGGAGCAACAGGTCiCAACAGGCC
JCGACGGGAACAACAGGAGTAACCGGTCjTAACGGGAG
KCAACAGGAATAACGGGAGCAACAGGTGkCAACTGGTG
LCGACGGGAATAACGGGAGTAACCGGTClCGACGGGAA
MCGACGGGAATAACGGGAGTAACAGGTC

a the PCR fragm ent size is the exact size, as deduced from sequence data.

The observed size is as m easured by capillary electrophoresis (the offset is indicated, and is proportional to allele size)

b Upercase letters: 27 bp repeat units; Lowercase letters: 9 bp repeat units

c "*" represent 9 base-pairs repeat units with a sequence m otif not observed in the B. anthracis alleles

To better understand the origin of this behaviour, we investigated the structure of this locus in the closely related B. cereus-B. thuringiensis group by taking advantage of available genome sequences. Figure 2 shows the organization of the locus in the genomes of B. anthracis (accession number AE016879), B. cereus ATCC14579 (AE016877), B. cereus G9241 [29], B. cereus ATCC10987 (AE017194), B. cereus E33L (NC_006274), and B. thuringiensis CEB97/027 (AE017355) also called Bt9727. The gene bearing Bams30 in B. anthracis (Ba2450) possess a collagen-like helix repeat and is flanked by two genes Ba2449 and Ba2451. Their homologues in the other strains were depicted using the same code. The organization in B. cereus G9241 is similar to B. anthracis, but in all four other strains, the situation is less simple. In B. cereus ATCC 14579, two genes possessing a collagen-like helix repeat protein are observed, instead of one in B. anthracis: Both genes possess a tandem repeat with similarity to Bams30, encoding the collagen-like repeat. Whereas in ATCC 10987, the two tandem repeats have nine base-pair repeat units, Bt9727-2241 contains a 27 bp repeat unit presumably derived from an ancestral 9 bp unit. Bt9727 is by far the closest B. anthracis neighbor among the 5 sequenced strains [30]. The composite organization of the Bams30 tandem repeat in B. anthracis can be explained by a rearrangement occurring in a Bt9727-type Bams30 locus. Strain "A1055", which is closest to the last common B. anthracis ancestor [20] shows the same rearrangement, which strengthens the validity of Bams30 as an interesting complementary tool for the identification of B. anthracis (the presence of the virulence plasmids, pXO1 and pXO2 is not sufficient since for instance "A1055" is lacking pXO1 [20]) even if the rearrangement is not strictly limited to B. anthracis as shown by the G9241 strain situation.
Figure 2

Organization of Bams30 locus in: (B.ant. Ames), B. anthracis strain Ames; (Bc ATCC 14579), B. cereus 14579; (Bc G9241), B. cereus G9241 and B. thuringiensis 97/027. The position of Bams30 primers is indicated by small black arrows; the primers localized in the NH2 terminus conserved part of the ExsH gene are indicated by small gray arrows. Tandem repeats with similarity to Bams30 are represented with striped boxes. Homologous genes are depicted using the same code.

Correspondance with agarose gel assignments

For reasons including accessibility to the different technologies, it is important to ensure that allele assignments deduced from agarose gel or capillary electrophoresis are compatible, so that the different methods can be used. For this purpose, allele sizes (expressed in basepairs, bps and converted to the number of repeat units, U) previously estimated by agarose gel were re-examined according to the capillary fragment analysis and available sequence data. For Bams3 (15 bp repeat unit) one allele, previously estimated at 609 bps (30 U) by agarose gel analysis, was corrected to 594 bps corresponding to 29 U, by capillary electrophoresis. Bams15 turned out to vary like a 9-mer rather than 18-mer repeat unit and two alleles were resolved (580 bps for 42 9-base pair units (42 U) and 598 bps for 44 U, previously grouped with 571 bps (41 U), 589 bps (43 U) or 607 bps (45 U). For Bams31 (9 bp repeat unit) one allele was resolved by capillary electrophoresis (781 bps for 65 U, previously grouped with the 772 bps for 64 U). For markers included in the MLVA8 assay [14] which could be typed on agarose (i.e. with the exception of pXO1 and pXO2) the data obtained here were in agreement with results generated by agarose gel electrophoresis [12]. Published MLVA8 [14,21-26] data contains some allele size assignments which do not correspond to the actual size. This is due to clerical errors in the initial report [14], as noticed previously [24] and data for some loci must be converted as described in the material and methods section in order to be fully compatible. Four new markers have been included. For Bams34, a 39-mer repeat marker, five alleles were described ranging from 238 to 581 bps (ranging from 4 to 13 repeat units). Bams44 (39-mer) and Bams53 (12-mer) show two alleles (respectively 339/417 bps or 8 and 12 repeat units, and 212/236 bps (6 and 8 repeat units)). A third allele is predicted from genome sequence data for the "Western" strain, but was not experimentally observed among the collection investigated here. For Bams51 (45-mer) four alleles were observed ranging from 338 to 538 bps (6 to 10 units).

Data analysis

When the eight markers comprising the MLVA8 assay are used, 30 different genotypes are resolved among the 160 isolates. With only few exceptions, these genotypes correspond to previously published profiles. Most exceptions are minor variations of previous types. The vast majority of French and Italian isolates belong to GT1 and GT3 within cluster A1a [14] in agreement with previous reports [22,26]. When the whole MLVA25 dataset is used, 67 genotypes are resolved. Isolates which are not resolved in this analysis have the same epidemiological history (when known). The clustering analysis is shown in Figure 3. Although MLVA is not by its very nature a tool with a high phylogenetic value per se, especially when the available strains do not fully cover the species diversity, the clustering achieved is in excellent agreement with the known relationship between the ancestral C type (genotype 67), the B cluster (genotypes 59 to 66, with the two well-separated subgroups, B1 and B2), and the A cluster (represented on one end by the "Ames" strain, initially assigned to A3b and more recently to A2 [20], and on the other end by the "Western" strain, initially assigned to A1a and more recently to A1 [20]). More precisely, the "Vollum" strain (genotype 54; strain "9" in [20]) and the "Australia94" strain (genotype 45; presumably strain "20" in [20]) are in the expected position with respect to the A group.
Figure 3

A Clustering analysis of genotyping data. The 67 genotypes are numbered from 1 to 67 (left-most column). The origin of the strains (when known) is indicated; ND, unknown. "Cluster" refers to the clustering and "group" refers to the genotype (GT) number based upon MLVA8 as proposed in [14]. Genotypes with no group assigned are usually minor variations of known, neighbouring groups. A number of reference strains are indicated in ().

Genotypes 55–56, and 57–58 are loosely connected to the others, and are suggested by clustering analysis as being intermediates between the B cluster and the A cluster. This position is reminiscent of the position occupied by strains "6", "7" and "8" investigated by Pearson et al. [20]. It may be of interest to note that "6" which branched out in an ancestral position compared to the whole "A" cluster in the SNP analysis [20], originates from Zambia, whereas genotypes 57 and 58 in Figure 3 are from Cameroon. We propose to call these very distinct MLVA groups types D and E (Figure 3).

Discussion

Bacillus anthracis genotyping is essential for epidemiological studies and for biosecurity related (including microbial forensics) issues [21]. Current methodologies such as MLVA8 are not sufficient to discriminate two geographically close isolates in natural outbreaks, since for instance most French and Italian isolates will be classified as GT1 or 3 [22,26]. Molecular characterization needs to be as precise as possible in order to discriminate isolates. The rational of this work was to update the MLVA method for quick (single-day analysis) and accurate discrimination of Bacillus anthracis isolates. The markers are stable, this is indirectly illustrated by the typing of "Sterne" strains from different origins. Genotypes 46 and 48 correspond to respectively two and five "Sterne" strains. Genotype 46 are the CIP (Collection Institut Pasteur) reference strains 7700 and 7702, genotype 48 covers "Sterne" vaccine strains from different countries, and the sequenced genome. The only difference in the two genotypes is for locus Bams28 [see additional file 1]. The number of VNTR loci was increased from 22 to 25 by addition of four new markers (and removal of Bams7, because allele sizes up to 2 kilobases are not adapted to typing on current capillary machines). The overall assay was converted from 25 monoplex PCR reactions, run on agarose gels and checked for size by eye or by using gel image analysis software, to 4 multiplex PCR analysed by automated capillary based fluorescent electrophoresis and internal size standard measurement for allele calculation. For most loci, accurate size estimate is achieved directly by the capillary electrophoresis machine. In other instances however, the sizing proposed by the machine, although quite reproducible, does not correspond to the real size. This could be due to the nature of the gel matrix, or to differences during migration between labelled PCR fragments and the ladder used, but most probably by a slightly biased flanking sequence or repeat unit-specific mobility pattern. Usually, the size estimate is shifted by a constant value (offset) but in some instances, the offset increases with increasing allele size (increasing repeat copy number). For this reason, allele numbering must be done carefully, using a correspondence table as presented here in Table 3. If different equipments, or reagents, are used, the correspondence indicated here must be checked by typing a number of reference strains (such as the widely available "Sterne" vaccine strain), before alleles can be confidently called and data can be merged. Size measurement from multiplexed, automated PCR products allows for single-day isolate genotyping which is of importance in a crisis situation. It also provides a slightly increased discrimination power as compared to the MLVA20 assay run on agarose gels for the same analysed markers. This difference is essentially due to the lack of resolution of agarose for the larger, 9 bp repeat unit loci, such as Bams30 and for Bams3, Bams13, Bams15 and Bams31 typing, where new alleles were identified. For Bams15 and Bams30, capillary resolution was able to show a 9 bps repeat unit length variation instead of the respectively 18 bps and 27 unit length proposed initially. The present investigation suggests that a recombination event at the Bams30 locus may have occurred prior to the emergence of B. anthracis. The event directly affects genes coding for constituents of the exosporium. Bc2381 is related to BclA, and Bc2382 corresponds to the exosporium H gene exsH [31]. In B. cereus ATCC 10987, B. thuringiensis 97/027 (Bt9727) and B. cereus genome E33L, an additional ORF is located within the region. The Bams30-containing gene in B. anthracis is the result of a recombination between Bt9727-2241 (coding for the BclA-like protein) and Bt9727-2244 (exsH). The beginning and the end of the protein sequence coded by Ba2450 are respectively identical to the beginning of Bt9727-2241 and to the end of Bt9727-2244. Interestingly, a similar rearrangement is observed independently in the B. cereus strain G9241 which caused an anthrax like disease in a human patient [29]. As a result of this fusion, the first part of the tandem repeat itself contains a 27 bp repeat unit whereas the second part is a 9 bp repeat tandem repeat. It may be of interest to observe that two of the most polymorphic tandem repeats in B. anthracis, Bams13 and Bams30, are associated with genes coding for components of the exosporium (Bams13 is part of the BclA gene [32]).

Conclusion

In this report we propose an improved automated genotyping system of B. anthracis by MLVA, extending the range of VNTR containing markers to 25, which increases the resolution power as compared to previous methods. The MLVA25 assay was used to genotype Italian and French isolates in a very fast and highly reproducible manner. We also better defined previously characterized alleles and describe new allelic variants. MLVA25 is a very accurate and discriminatory genotyping method and could be a promising technique for future epidemiological studies as well as differentiation of deliberated vs. naturally occurring outbreaks. The improved assay and resulting data remains compatible with the initial agarose gel based assay. The genotyping data can be queried on the web page MLVA web-service [33]. This site allows the comparison of local typing data to the data generated in this report.

Methods

Bacterial strains and isolates

The strains and DNA samples are from the collection maintained by the French Ministry of Defence at Centre d'Etude du Bouchet (CEB), from Istituto Superiore di Sanità (ISS) Italian collections and from the Italian Reference Center for Anthrax (ISZ, Foggia). Total genomic DNA was extracted as previously reported [30].

VNTR amplification and analysis

Twenty-five loci were used, 21 from previous studies [12,14] and 4 new ones identified by comparing B. anthracis genome sequences using the site GPMS, Genomes, Polymorphism and Minisatellites [34] as described by Denoeud et al. [13]. Multiplex PCR reactions were prepared as follows: 5–10 ng DNA were amplified in a final volume of 15 μl containing 1× PCR Roche reaction buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, 1,5 mM MgCl2, 50 mM KCl pH 8.3), 0.2 mM dNTPs (Amersham-PharmaciaTM), the appropriate concentrations of each primer (one of which was fluorescently labelled) as reported in Table 2, and 1 U Taq polymerase (Roche). The four multiplex PCR amplifications were performed on Peltier Thermal Cycler (PTC) DNA Engine DYAD or PTC200 (MJ Research) with a starting denaturation step at 96°C for 3 min, followed by 36 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 20 seconds, annealing at 60°C for 30 seconds and extension at 65°C for 2 min. The reactions were terminated by a final incubation at 65°C for 5 min. The PCR products were diluted 1:5 and 5 μl of the dilution was added to a mix containing 40 μl of Sample Loading Solution (SLS, Beckmann Coulter, Fullerton, CA., USA) and 0.5 μl of MicroSTEP-15a (800) size marker (Microzone Haywards Heath, UK). The samples were separated by electrophoresis in CEQ Separation Gel LPA I (Urea in buffered sieving matrix; Polyacrylamide, Beckman Coulter) on a CEQ 8000 automatic DNA Analysis System (Beckman-Coulter, Fullerton, CA., USA) with the following conditions: denaturation 90°C for 120 sec, inject 2.0 kV for 20 sec, separation 3.0 kV for 180 min. Allele sizes were estimated using CEQ Fragment Analysis System analysis software, by comparing the amplicons to the internal size standard (MicroStep-15a), consisting of fifteen labelled fragments ranging from 75 to 1000 bp. Bams30 alleles sequencing was done as previously described [30]. The corresponding sequences accession numbers (EMBL) are AM182499-AM182509.

MLVA data analysis

Previously published MLVA8 typing data was recovered from the literature [14,21-26]. Different conventions have been used for allele calling so that some minor corrections must be applied before merging the data. As noticed by Cheung et al. [24], some of the sizes initially indicated [14] do not correspond to the actual size, as can be deduced for instance from published genome sequence data. There is a 1 bp error in the vrrA allele sizes (for instance the allele indicated 313 in [14] is 314 bp). This has no consequences in terms of repeat unit copy number since vrrA has a 12 bp motif. The correction which needs to be applied to vrrC1 (9 bp repeat unit) is a bit more complex and as follows: the 520, 538, 583, 613 and 685 bp alleles must be converted to respectively 517, 535, 580, 616, and 688. The pXO1-aat sizes are underestimated by 3 bp. As a result the correct "Ames" strain MLVA8 code expressed in base-pairs reads 314-229-153-580-532-158-126-141 (or in terms of repeat copy numbers: 10-16-6-53-17-2-7-10) for vrrA, vrrB1, vrrB2, vrrC1, vrrC2, CG3, pXO1-aat and pXO2-at respectively. The "Sterne" strain is 314-229-162-580-532-158-132-135. Since at least one of these two strains is included in the cited publications, it is possible to deduce which conversion(s) needs to be applied to the corresponding data set. The MLVA25 genotype was deduced from the genbank sequence data for strains "Ames", "Sterne", "Vollum", "Kruger", "Western", "BA1055", "Australia94". All the data produced was managed using BioNumerics software version 4.5 (Applied Maths, Sint-Marteens-Latem, Belgium). Clustering was done using the categorical similarity coefficient and the Single Linkage Method.

Authors' contributions

GF, ACia did the set up of the MLVA25 assay. ACia, RDes and SV participated to typing work. FL, ACas, SV, CP and GV did the error checking analysis. SV and OG did the Bams30 alleles sequence analysis. GF, ACia, ACar and ACie did various sequence analysis. RD'am and FO did error checking of overall sequence analysis. SV and CP did the Bams30 locus comparison using the different available genome sequences. GV was in charge of the Bionumerics database and clustering analyses. AF, CLD and JV maintained the Italian and French reference collections for B. anthracis respectively and extracted some of the DNA samples used. FL, RD'am and GV conceived the study. FL and GV wrote the report. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Additional File 1

This file contains the data sets for the 67 genotypes of B. anthracis from Italy and France resulting in. It is a Microsoft Excel Worksheet. Click here for file
  31 in total

1.  Numerical index of the discriminatory ability of typing systems: an application of Simpson's index of diversity.

Authors:  P R Hunter; M A Gaston
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Polymorphism in the collagen-like region of the Bacillus anthracis BclA protein leads to variation in exosporium filament length.

Authors:  Patricia Sylvestre; Evelyne Couture-Tosi; Michèle Mock
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 3.  Anthrax molecular epidemiology and forensics: using the appropriate marker for different evolutionary scales.

Authors:  Paul Keim; Matthew N Van Ert; Talima Pearson; Amy J Vogler; Lynn Y Huynh; David M Wagner
Journal:  Infect Genet Evol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.342

4.  Intriguing diversity of Bacillus anthracis in eastern Poland--the molecular echoes of the past outbreaks.

Authors:  Rafał Gierczyński; Stanisław Kałuzewski; Alexander Rakin; Marek Jagielski; Aleksandra Zasada; Antoni Jakubczak; Bogna Borkowska-Opacka; Waldemar Rastawicki
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 2.742

5.  Phylogenetic discovery bias in Bacillus anthracis using single-nucleotide polymorphisms from whole-genome sequencing.

Authors:  Talima Pearson; Joseph D Busch; Jacques Ravel; Timothy D Read; Shane D Rhoton; Jana M U'Ren; Tatum S Simonson; Sergey M Kachur; Rebecca R Leadem; Michelle L Cardon; Matthew N Van Ert; Lynn Y Huynh; Claire M Fraser; Paul Keim
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-09-03       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Identification of anthrax toxin genes in a Bacillus cereus associated with an illness resembling inhalation anthrax.

Authors:  Alex R Hoffmaster; Jacques Ravel; David A Rasko; Gail D Chapman; Michael D Chute; Chung K Marston; Barun K De; Claudio T Sacchi; Collette Fitzgerald; Leonard W Mayer; Martin C J Maiden; Fergus G Priest; Margaret Barker; Lingxia Jiang; Regina Z Cer; Jennifer Rilstone; Scott N Peterson; Robbin S Weyant; Darrell R Galloway; Timothy D Read; Tanja Popovic; Claire M Fraser
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-05-21       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  High resolution, on-line identification of strains from the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex based on tandem repeat typing.

Authors:  Philippe Le Flèche; Michel Fabre; France Denoeud; Jean-Louis Koeck; Gilles Vergnaud
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2002-11-27       Impact factor: 3.605

8.  Bacillus anthracis incident, Kameido, Tokyo, 1993.

Authors:  Hiroshi Takahashi; Paul Keim; Arnold F Kaufmann; Christine Keys; Kimothy L Smith; Kiyosu Taniguchi; Sakae Inouye; Takeshi Kurata
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 6.883

9.  Identification of polymorphic tandem repeats by direct comparison of genome sequence from different bacterial strains: a web-based resource.

Authors:  France Denoeud; Gilles Vergnaud
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-01-12       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Tandem repeats analysis for the high resolution phylogenetic analysis of Yersinia pestis.

Authors:  C Pourcel; F André-Mazeaud; H Neubauer; F Ramisse; G Vergnaud
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2004-06-08       Impact factor: 3.605

View more
  68 in total

1.  MLVA and SNP analysis identified a unique genetic cluster in Bulgarian Bacillus anthracis strains.

Authors:  M Antwerpen; D Ilin; E Georgieva; H Meyer; E Savov; D Frangoulidis
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2011-01-30       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Genetic diversity among Bacillus anthracis soil isolates at fine geographic scales.

Authors:  Chad W Stratilo; Douglas E Bader
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  A cautionary tale: Lack of consistency in allele sizes between two laboratories for a published multilocus microsatellite typing system.

Authors:  Alessandro C Pasqualotto; David W Denning; Michael J Anderson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-12-13       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Clostridium botulinum group I strain genotyping by 15-locus multilocus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis.

Authors:  Silvia Fillo; Francesco Giordani; Fabrizio Anniballi; Olivier Gorgé; Vincent Ramisse; Gilles Vergnaud; Julia M Riehm; Holger C Scholz; Wolf D Splettstoesser; Jasper Kieboom; Jaran-Strand Olsen; Lucia Fenicia; Florigio Lista
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 5.  The genome and variation of Bacillus anthracis.

Authors:  Paul Keim; Jeffrey M Gruendike; Alexandra M Klevytska; James M Schupp; Jean Challacombe; Richard Okinaka
Journal:  Mol Aspects Med       Date:  2009-09-01

6.  Bovine Bacillus anthracis in Cameroon.

Authors:  Paola Pilo; Alexandra Rossano; Hamadou Bamamga; Souley Abdoulkadiri; Vincent Perreten; Joachim Frey
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  SNR analysis: molecular investigation of an anthrax epidemic.

Authors:  Giuliano Garofolo; Andrea Ciammaruconi; Antonio Fasanella; Silvia Scasciamacchia; Rosanna Adone; Valentina Pittiglio; Florigio Lista
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2010-02-28       Impact factor: 2.741

8.  Anthrax outbreak in a Swedish beef cattle herd--1st case in 27 years: Case report.

Authors:  Susanna Sternberg Lewerin; Marianne Elvander; Therese Westermark; Lisbeth Nisu Hartzell; Agneta Karlsson Norström; Sara Ehrs; Rickard Knutsson; Stina Englund; Ann-Christin Andersson; Malin Granberg; Stina Bäckman; Per Wikström; Karin Sandstedt
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 1.695

9.  Identification and classification of bcl genes and proteins of Bacillus cereus group organisms and their application in Bacillus anthracis detection and fingerprinting.

Authors:  Tomasz A Leski; Clayton C Caswell; Marcin Pawlowski; David J Klinke; Janusz M Bujnicki; Sean J Hart; Slawomir Lukomski
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Texas isolates closely related to Bacillus anthracis Ames.

Authors:  Leo J Kenefic; Talima Pearson; Richard T Okinaka; Wai-Kwan Chung; Tamara Max; Carla P Trim; Jodi A Beaudry; James M Schupp; Matthew N Van Ert; Chung K Marston; Kathy Gutierrez; Amy K Swinford; Alex R Hoffmaster; Paul Keim
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 6.883

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.