Literature DB >> 16599898

Preoperative cardiopulmonary risk assessment by cardiopulmonary exercise testing.

P Older1, R Smith, A Hall, C French.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review the strategies for identification and subsequent management of high-risk patients that have been proposed to reduce perioperative morbidity and mortality. DATA SOURCES: Articles and published reviews of studies on evaluation and management of patients to reduce perioperative morbidity and mortality. SUMMARY OF REVIEW: Many strategies have been devised to evaluate the perioperative risk in elderly patients, particularly those who are about to undergo major intra-abdominal surgery. An assessment of cardiac and pulmonary responses to exercise-induced stress (i.e. cardiopulmonary exercise testing) using a bicycle ergometer, metabolic cart (to measure oxygen uptake and carbon dioxide excretion) and a 12 lead electrocardiograph has been found to be a non.invasive test that is quick, cheap, easy to perform and requires no special preparation. It has advantages over any other preoperative test by defining operative risk and allowing logical triage according to objective risk assessment. It is able to objectively evaluate the extent of any cardiac failure (by assessing the anaerobic threshold), myocardial ischaemia, provides insight into stroke index, the presence of pulmonary artery hypertension and defines obstructive and restrictive lung disease and ventilation perfusion inequality better than conventional preoperative respiratory function tests.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients who are about to undergo major intra-abdominal surgery, preoperative cardiopulmonary exercise testing is an excellent predictor of risk in the postoperative period. No other test is able to offer such a comprehensive preoperative risk evaluation for an operative patient.

Entities:  

Year:  2000        PMID: 16599898

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Resusc        ISSN: 1441-2772            Impact factor:   2.159


  6 in total

1.  Reporting individual surgeon outcomes does not lead to risk aversion in abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery.

Authors:  A Saratzis; A Thatcher; M F Bath; D A Sidloff; M J Bown; J Shakespeare; R D Sayers; C Imray
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Pilot Feasibility Study of Comprehensive Pulmonary Evaluation Following Lung Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Aliva De; Leo Mascarenhas; Sunil Kamath; Alejandro LaRiviere; Fariba Goodarzian; Thomas G Keens; Rajkumar Venkatramani
Journal:  J Pediatr Hematol Oncol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.289

Review 3.  Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) for gastrointestinal surgery, part 2: consensus statement for anaesthesia practice.

Authors:  A Feldheiser; O Aziz; G Baldini; B P B W Cox; K C H Fearon; L S Feldman; T J Gan; R H Kennedy; O Ljungqvist; D N Lobo; T Miller; F F Radtke; T Ruiz Garces; T Schricker; M J Scott; J K Thacker; L M Ytrebø; F Carli
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 2.105

4.  ARTP statement on cardiopulmonary exercise testing 2021.

Authors:  Andrew Pritchard; Paul Burns; Joao Correia; Patrick Jamieson; Peter Moxon; Joanna Purvis; Maximillian Thomas; Hannah Tighe; Karl Peter Sylvester
Journal:  BMJ Open Respir Res       Date:  2021-11

5.  The Marsden Morbidity Index: the derivation and validation of a simple risk index scoring system using cardiopulmonary exercise testing variables to predict morbidity in high-risk patients having major cancer surgery.

Authors:  Z Nawoor-Quinn; A Oliver; R Raobaikady; K Mohammad; S Cone; R Kasivisvanathan
Journal:  Perioper Med (Lond)       Date:  2022-09-22

6.  Morbidity, mortality, and categorization of the risk of perioperative complications in lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Fabiana Stanzani; Denise de Moraes Paisani; Anderson de Oliveira; Rodrigo Caetano de Souza; João Aléssio Juliano Perfeito; Sonia Maria Faresin
Journal:  J Bras Pneumol       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.624

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.