Literature DB >> 16598634

Relationships between microbial community structure and soil processes under elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide.

David A Lipson1, Michelle Blair, Greg Barron-Gafford, Kathrine Grieve, Ramesh Murthy.   

Abstract

There is little current understanding of the relationship between soil microbial community composition and soil processes rates, nor of the effect climate change and elevated CO(2) will have on microbial communities and their functioning. Using the eastern cottonwood (Populus deltoides) plantation at the Biosphere 2 Laboratory, we studied the relationships between microbial community structure and process rates, and the effects of elevated atmospheric CO(2) on microbial biomass, activity, and community structure. Soils were sampled from three treatments (400, 800, and 1200 ppm CO(2)), a variety of microbial biomass and activity parameters were measured, and the bacterial community was described by 16S rRNA libraries. Glucose substrate-induced respiration (SIR) was significantly higher in the 1200 ppm CO(2) treatment. There were also a variety of complex, nonlinear responses to elevated CO(2). There was no consistent effect of elevated CO(2) on bacterial diversity; however, there was extensive variation in microbial community structure within the plantation. The southern ends of the 800 and 1200 ppm CO(2) bays were dominated by beta-Proteobacteria, and had higher fungal biomass, whereas the other areas contained more alpha-Proteobacteria and Acidobacteria. A number of soil process rates, including salicylate, glutamate, and glycine substrate-induced respiration and proteolysis, were significantly related to the relative abundance of the three most frequent bacterial taxa, and to fungal biomass. Overall, variation in microbial activity was better explained by microbial community composition than by CO(2) treatment. However, the altered diversity and activity in the southern bays of the two high CO(2) treatments could indicate an interaction between CO(2) and light.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16598634     DOI: 10.1007/s00248-006-9032-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microb Ecol        ISSN: 0095-3628            Impact factor:   4.552


  20 in total

1.  Changes in soil microbial community structure and function in an alpine dry meadow following spring snow melt.

Authors:  D A Lipson; C W Schadt; S K Schmidt
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2002-03-05       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  Cultivation of globally distributed soil bacteria from phylogenetic lineages previously only detected in cultivation-independent surveys.

Authors:  Michelle Sait; Philip Hugenholtz; Peter H Janssen
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.491

Review 3.  Microbial diversity and function in soil: from genes to ecosystems.

Authors:  Vigdis Torsvik; Lise Øvreås
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 7.934

Review 4.  Phylogenetic approaches for describing and comparing the diversity of microbial communities.

Authors:  Andrew P Martin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 5.  Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation.

Authors:  R I Amann; W Ludwig; K H Schleifer
Journal:  Microbiol Rev       Date:  1995-03

Review 6.  Impact of culture-independent studies on the emerging phylogenetic view of bacterial diversity.

Authors:  P Hugenholtz; B M Goebel; N R Pace
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  DNA rehybridization during PCR: the 'Cot effect' and its consequences.

Authors:  F Mathieu-Daudé; J Welsh; T Vogt; M McClelland
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1996-06-01       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Elevated CO2 alters community-level physiological profiles and enzyme activities in alpine grassland.

Authors:  C Mayr; M Miller; H Insam
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.363

9.  Rapid method for separation of bacterial DNA from humic substances in sediments for polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  Y L Tsai; B H Olson
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Responses to elevated carbon dioxide in artificial tropical ecosystems.

Authors:  C Körner; J A Arnone
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-09-18       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  6 in total

1.  Soil microbial community responses to multiple experimental climate change drivers.

Authors:  Hector F Castro; Aimée T Classen; Emily E Austin; Richard J Norby; Christopher W Schadt
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Effects of Elevated Atmospheric CO2 on Microbial Community Structure at the Plant-Soil Interface of Young Beech Trees (Fagus sylvatica L.) Grown at Two Sites with Contrasting Climatic Conditions.

Authors:  Silvia Gschwendtner; Martin Leberecht; Marion Engel; Susanne Kublik; Michael Dannenmann; Andrea Polle; Michael Schloter
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 4.552

3.  Effects of elevated CO2 on communities of denitrifying bacteria and methanogens in a temperate marsh microcosm.

Authors:  Seung-Hoon Lee; Seon-Young Kim; Hojeong Kang
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2012-03-24       Impact factor: 4.552

4.  Interaction effects of elevated CO₂ and temperature on microbial biomass and enzyme activities in tropical rice soils.

Authors:  Suvendu Das; P Bhattacharyya; T K Adhya
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  The phylogenetic composition and structure of soil microbial communities shifts in response to elevated carbon dioxide.

Authors:  Zhili He; Yvette Piceno; Ye Deng; Meiying Xu; Zhenmei Lu; Todd Desantis; Gary Andersen; Sarah E Hobbie; Peter B Reich; Jizhong Zhou
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 10.302

6.  Florida harvester ant nest architecture, nest relocation and soil carbon dioxide gradients.

Authors:  Walter R Tschinkel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.