Literature DB >> 16598489

[The HINTEGRA ankle: short- and mid-term results].

B Hintermann1, V Valderrabano, M Knupp, M Horisberger.   

Abstract

The HINTEGRA ankle was developed as an attempt to specifically address the needs of minimal bone resection, extended bone support, proper ligament balancing, and minimal contact stresses within and around the prosthesis. The purpose of this article was to present the design and rationale of this prosthesis, and to analyze the clinical and radiological short- to mid-term results particularly with respect to the revisions and learning curve. Of the 278 total ankle replacements (between 2000 and 2004) with the HINTEGRA ankle, 271 ankles [patients: 261, males: 133, females: 128, age: 58.4 years (range: 25-90 years)] were clinically and radiographically assessed after 36.1 months (range: 12-64 months). The preoperative diagnosis was post-traumatic osteoarthrosis in 206 cases (76.0%), systemic arthritis in 34 cases (12.5%), and a primary osteoarthrosis in 31 cases (11.5%). Beside 4 perioperative and 19 early postoperative complications, a late complication occurred in 40 cases (14.8%). Of these, 22 complications (8.2%) were not related to implants, and 18 complications (6.6%) were related to implants. In all, 39 cases (14.4%) were revised; of these, 5 cases (1.8%) were revised to ankle arthrodesis. All other 34 revision arthroplasties were successful and did not evidence any differences in the outcome to the non-revised ankles. The AOFAS hindfoot score improved from 40.3 (range: 14-61) to 85.0 (range: 44-100) points at last follow-up. Radiographically, the tibial component was stable in all remaining 266 ankles, and no tilting of the component occurred since surgery. The talar component was positioned too posteriorly in 12 ankles (4.4%). The concept of minimal bone resection and wide bony support was shown to be successful on the tibial and talar sides. Most complications occurred in the early cases of this series, and the learning curve was found to be short and steep. Despite the high amount of post-traumatic cases with limited soft tissue quality, the obtained function, pain relief, and patient satisfaction were promising and, compared with other devices, the results mostly were superior. This may support the belief that anatomically shaped surfaces, as is the case in the HINTEGRA ankle, may advance success in total ankle replacement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16598489     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-006-0941-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  18 in total

1.  Clinical comparison of two total ankle replacements.

Authors:  T M Clough; S Jari
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.827

Review 2.  Total ankle replacement.

Authors:  Beat Hintermann; Victor Valderrabano
Journal:  Foot Ankle Clin       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.653

3.  Can the ankle joint be replaced?

Authors:  D L Hamblen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1985-11

4.  Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement (STAR).

Authors:  Hakon Kofoed
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  The HINTEGRA ankle: rationale and short-term results of 122 consecutive ankles.

Authors:  Beat Hintermann; Victor Valderrabano; Greta Dereymaeker; Walter Dick
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Scandinavian total ankle replacement: a 3.7-year average followup of 65 patients.

Authors:  Victor Valderrabano; Beat Hintermann; Walter Dick
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Midterm results of the Salto Total Ankle Prosthesis.

Authors:  M Bonnin; T Judet; J A Colombier; F Buscayret; N Graveleau; P Piriou
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Total ankle arthroplasty: a unique design. Two to twelve-year follow-up.

Authors:  M T Pyevich; C L Saltzman; J J Callaghan; F G Alvine
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Total joint arthroplasty. The ankle.

Authors:  R N Stauffer
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 7.616

10.  New Jersey low contact stress total ankle replacement: biomechanical rationale and review of 23 cementless cases.

Authors:  F F Buechel; M J Pappas; L J Iorio
Journal:  Foot Ankle       Date:  1988-06
View more
  9 in total

1.  Muscular atrophy of the lower leg in unilateral post traumatic osteoarthritis of the ankle joint.

Authors:  Martin Wiewiorski; Kai Dopke; Christina Steiger; Victor Valderrabano
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  [Results for endoprosthetic care in patients younger than 50 years].

Authors:  J Ziegler; M Amlang; M Bottesi; S Kirschner; W-C Witzleb; K-P Günther
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 3.  [Modern three-piece total ankle replacement. Frequency and causes of luxation and premature wear of the polyethylene bearing].

Authors:  A H Hoffmann; B Fink
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  [Ankle joint prosthesis for bone defects].

Authors:  C Lampert
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  The reliability and validity of radiographic measurements for determining the three-dimensional position of the talus in varus and valgus osteoarthritic ankles.

Authors:  Tomasz L Nosewicz; Markus Knupp; Lilianna Bolliger; Beat Hintermann
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Thrombembolic complications after total ankle replacement.

Authors:  Alexej Barg; Katharina Barg; Stefan W Schneider; Geert Pagenstert; Marcel Gloyer; Heath B Henninger; Victor Valderrabano
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2013-09-28

7.  [Revision arthroplasty of the ankle joint].

Authors:  B Hintermann; A Barg; M Knupp
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  Treatment of ankle osteoarthritis: arthrodesis versus total ankle replacement.

Authors:  N Espinosa; G Klammer
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 3.693

9.  TOTAL ANKLE ARTHROPLASTY: BRAZILIAN EXPERIENCE WITH THE HINTEGRA PROSTHESIS.

Authors:  Caio Nery; Túlio Diniz Fernandes; Cibele Réssio; Mauro Luiz Fuchs; Alexandre Leme de Godoy Santos; Rafael Trevisan Ortiz
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2015-11-16
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.