Literature DB >> 16598066

Symmetric interactions within a homogeneous starburst cell network can lead to robust asymmetries in dendrites of starburst amacrine cells.

Thomas A Münch1, Frank S Werblin.   

Abstract

Starburst amacrine cells in the mammalian retina respond asymmetrically to movement along their dendrites; centrifugal movement elicits stronger responses in each dendrite than centripetal movement. It has been suggested that the asymmetrical response can be attributed to intrinsic properties of the processes themselves. But starburst cells are known to release and have receptors for both GABA and acetylcholine. We tested whether interactions within the starburst cell network can contribute to their directional response properties. In a computational model of interacting starburst amacrine cells, we simulated the response of individual dendrites to moving light stimuli. By setting the model parameters for "synaptic connection strength" (cs) to positive or negative values, overlapping starburst dendrites could either excite or inhibit each other. For some values of cs, we observed a very robust inward/outward asymmetry of the starburst dendrites consistent with the reported physiological findings. This is the case, for example, if a starburst cell receives inhibition from other starburst cells located in its surround. For other values of cs, individual dendrites can respond best either to inward movement or respond symmetrically. A properly wired network of starburst cells can therefore account for the experimentally observed asymmetry of their response to movement, independent of any internal biophysical or biochemical properties of starburst cell dendrites.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16598066     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00628.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  20 in total

Review 1.  Direction selectivity in the retina: symmetry and asymmetry in structure and function.

Authors:  David I Vaney; Benjamin Sivyer; W Rowland Taylor
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  GABA-mediated spatial and temporal asymmetries that contribute to the directionally selective light responses of starburst amacrine cells in retina.

Authors:  Andrey V Dmitriev; Konstantin E Gavrikov; Stuart C Mangel
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Conditional Knock-Out of Vesicular GABA Transporter Gene from Starburst Amacrine Cells Reveals the Contributions of Multiple Synaptic Mechanisms Underlying Direction Selectivity in the Retina.

Authors:  Zhe Pei; Qiang Chen; David Koren; Benno Giammarinaro; Hector Acaron Ledesma; Wei Wei
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  The synaptic mechanism of direction selectivity in distal processes of starburst amacrine cells.

Authors:  Seunghoon Lee; Z Jimmy Zhou
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-09-21       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 5.  The role of starburst amacrine cells in visual signal processing.

Authors:  W R Taylor; R G Smith
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.241

6.  Inhibitory input to the direction-selective ganglion cell is saturated at low contrast.

Authors:  Mikhail Y Lipin; W Rowland Taylor; Robert G Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  General features of inhibition in the inner retina.

Authors:  Katrin Franke; Tom Baden
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  A Role for Synaptic Input Distribution in a Dendritic Computation of Motion Direction in the Retina.

Authors:  Anna L Vlasits; Ryan D Morrie; Alexandra Tran-Van-Minh; Adam Bleckert; Christian F Gainer; David A DiGregorio; Marla B Feller
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Directional excitatory input to direction-selective ganglion cells in the rabbit retina.

Authors:  Kumiko A Percival; Sowmya Venkataramani; Robert G Smith; W Rowland Taylor
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 3.215

Review 10.  Visual Circuits for Direction Selectivity.

Authors:  Alex S Mauss; Anna Vlasits; Alexander Borst; Marla Feller
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 12.449

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.