Literature DB >> 16595497

Dual-time-point 18F-FDG PET for the evaluation of gallbladder carcinoma.

Yoshihiro Nishiyama1, Yuka Yamamoto, Kotaro Fukunaga, Naruhide Kimura, Akihiro Miki, Yasuhiro Sasakawa, Hisao Wakabayashi, Katashi Satoh, Motoomi Ohkawa.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Conventional imaging techniques such as ultrasonography, CT, and MRI are able to detect gallbladder abnormalities but are not always able to differentiate a malignancy from other disease processes such as cholecystitis. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of dual-time-point (18)F-FDG PET for differentiating malignant from benign gallbladder disease.
METHODS: The study evaluated 32 patients who were suspected of having gallbladder tumors. (18)F-FDG PET (whole body) was performed at 62 +/- 8 min (early) after (18)F-FDG injection and was repeated 146 +/- 14 min (delayed) after injection only in the abdominal region. We evaluated the (18)F-FDG uptake both visually and semiquantitatively. Semiquantitative analysis using the standardized uptake value (SUV) was performed for both early and delayed images (SUV(early) and SUV(delayed), respectively). The retention index (RI) was calculated according to the equation (SUV(delayed) - SUV(early)) x 100/SUV(early). The tumor-to-liver ratio was also calculated.
RESULTS: The final diagnosis was gallbladder carcinoma in 23 patients and benign disease in 9 patients. For visual analysis of gallbladder carcinoma, delayed (18)F-FDG PET images improved the specificity of diagnosis in 2 patients. When an SUV(early) of 4.5, SUV(delayed) of 2.9, and RI of -8 were chosen as arbitrary cutoffs for differentiating between malignant and benign conditions, sensitivity increased from 82.6% to 95.7% and 100% for delayed imaging and combined early and delayed imaging (i.e., RI), respectively. With the same criteria, specificity decreased from 55.6% to 44.4% for delayed imaging and combined early and delayed imaging, respectively. The specificity of (18)F-FDG PET improved to 80% in the group with a normal level of C-reactive protein (CRP) and decreased to 0% in the group with an elevated CRP level. For gallbladder carcinoma, both SUV and tumor-to-liver ratios derived from delayed images were significantly higher than the ratios derived from early images (P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: Delayed (18)F-FDG PET is more helpful than early (18)F-FDG PET for evaluating malignant lesions because of increased lesion uptake and increased lesion-to-background contrast. However, the diagnostic performance of (18)F-FDG PET depends on CRP levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16595497

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  33 in total

1.  Successful diagnosis of gallbladder carcinoma coexisting with adenomyomatosis by 18F-FDG-PET--report of a case.

Authors:  Keiichi Suzuki; Susumu Watada; Mitsui Yoko; Tadaki Nakahara; Yusuke Kumamoto
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2011-12

2.  Partial volume correction of standardized uptake values and the dual time point in FDG-PET imaging: should these be routinely employed in assessing patients with cancer?

Authors:  Sandip Basu; Abass Alavi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 3.  Cross-sectional Imaging of Gallbladder Carcinoma: An Update.

Authors:  Naveen Kalra; Pankaj Gupta; Manphool Singhal; Rajesh Gupta; Vikas Gupta; Radhika Srinivasan; Bhagwant R Mittal; Radha K Dhiman; Niranjan Khandelwal
Journal:  J Clin Exp Hepatol       Date:  2018-04-30

4.  Radio-pathological Correlation of 18F-FDG PET in Characterizing Gallbladder Wall Thickening.

Authors:  Vikas Gupta; K S Vishnu; Thakur D Yadav; Yashwant R Sakaray; Santosh Irrinki; B R Mittal; N Kalra; K Vaiphei
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2019-12

5.  Detection of hepatic metastases using dual-time-point FDG PET/CT scans in patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Jeong Won Lee; Seok-Ki Kim; Sang Mi Lee; Seung Hwan Moon; Tae-Sung Kim
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.488

6.  Dynamic changes of FDG uptake and clearance in normal tissues.

Authors:  Gang Cheng; Abass Alavi; Esther Lim; Thomas J Werner; Catherine V Del Bello; Scott R Akers
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.488

7.  Dual-time-point FDG-PET/CT for the detection of hepatic metastases.

Authors:  Albert Dirisamer; Benjamin S Halpern; Wolfgang Schima; Martin Heinisch; Florian Wolf; Mohsen Beheshti; Franz Dirisamer; Michael Weber; Werner Langsteger
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2008-08-16       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  Does PET-CT scan have a role prior to radical re-resection for incidental gallbladder cancer?

Authors:  Parul J Shukla; Savio G Barreto; Supreeta Arya; Shailesh V Shrikhande; Rohini Hawaldar; Nilendu Purandare; Venkatesh Rangarajan
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.647

9.  Implications of standardized uptake value measurements of the primary lesions in proven cases of breast carcinoma with different degree of disease burden at diagnosis: does 2-deoxy-2-[F-18]fluoro-D-glucose-positron emission tomography predict tumor biology?

Authors:  Sandip Basu; Ayse Mavi; Tevfik Cermik; Mohamed Houseni; Abass Alavi
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2007-11-14       Impact factor: 3.488

10.  Double-phase 18F-FDG PET-CT for determination of pulmonary tuberculoma activity.

Authors:  In-Ju Kim; Jung Sub Lee; Seong-Jang Kim; Yong-Ki Kim; Yeon Joo Jeong; Sungmin Jun; Hyun Yul Nam; Ju Sung Kim
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-12-18       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.