| Literature DB >> 16595006 |
Rajprasad Loganathan1, Mehmet Bilgen, Baraa Al-Hafez, Mohammed D Alenezy, Irina V Smirnova.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Diabetes is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease. In particular, type 1 diabetes compromises the cardiac function of individuals at a relatively early age due to the protracted course of abnormal glucose homeostasis. The functional abnormalities of diabetic myocardium have been attributed to the pathological changes of diabetic cardiomyopathy.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2006 PMID: 16595006 PMCID: PMC1450259 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2840-5-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol ISSN: 1475-2840 Impact factor: 9.951
Glucometry and gravimetry data obtained at 8 weeks of diabetes
| Control (6) | 110 ± 15 | 4.7 ± 0.2 | 1,305 ± 80 | 420 ± 20 | 3.1 ± 0.1 |
| Diabetic (6) | 545 ± 45* | 13* # | 1,132 ± 81 | 292 ± 35* | 3.9 ± 0.5* |
* P < 0.05 when diabetic rat values were compared to controls.
# – since all diabetic rats had HbA1c levels higher than detectable by the method used, we used the highest detectable value (13%) for statistical purposes.
Figure 1Representative end-diastolic and end-systolic cine MR images of left ventricle (LV) from control and diabetic rats Typical slices of LV along the cardiac short axis obtained during end diastole and end systole from age-matched control and diabetic rats (8 weeks diabetes duration) are shown. The blood and the endocardium are clearly distinguished during both phases by the contrast provided by high resolution MRI.
Figure 2Left ventricular (LV) volume profiles of control and diabetic rats obtained from MRI reconstruction of LV slices collected throughout the complete cardiac cycle Graphical representation of LV volumes corresponding to ten equally incremented phases of the rat cardiac cycle is provided. The LV volumes for control (open circles) and diabetic (filled circles) rats were computed from the corresponding MRI scans as described in methods. End-diastole and end-systole correspond to phase 1 and phase 6, respectively, in both the control and diabetic group. LV volumes in all but phases 4 and 5 were significantly different (*, P < 0.05) between groups. Note that the actual cardiac cycle duration was 216.7 ± 28.7 ms in control and 242.5 ± 15.0 ms in diabetic rats, with an insignificant difference (P > 0.05). Hence the cardiac cycle was divided into phases 1 through 10 as discussed in the methods section.
Left ventricular (LV) characteristics normalized to body mass
| LV wall volume (mm3/g) | 1.12 ± 0.30 | 2.00 ± 0.30* |
| End-diastolic volume (μl/g) | 1.38 ± 0.10 | 1.46 ± 0.20 |
| End-systolic volume (μl/g) | 0.49 ± 0.01 | 0.79 ± 0.10* |
| Stroke volume (μl/g) | 0.89 ± 0.01 | 0.67 ± 0.10* |
* P < 0.05 when diabetic rat values were compared to controls.
Figure 3Cardiac cycle left ventricular (LV) dV/dt values for control and diabetic rats First derivatives of LV volume with respect to time for control (open bars) and diabetic (filled bars) rats obtained from slopes of secant lines connecting the subsequent phases of cardiac cycle are presented. The x-axis labels refer to phase transitions during the cardiac cycle (for example, '1' corresponds to phase 1–2 transition). The negative dV/dt values correspond to systole and positive values correspond to diastole. The dV/dt values corresponding to all transitions except 6–7 (the end-systolic phase transition) were significantly different between control and diabetic rats (*, P < 0.05).