Literature DB >> 16594831

Free at last? Social dominance, loss aversion, and White and Black Americans' differing assessments of racial progress.

Richard P Eibach1, Thomas Keegan.   

Abstract

White Americans tend to believe that there has been greater progress toward racial equality than do Black Americans. The authors explain this difference by combining insights from prospect theory and social dominance theory. According to prospect theory, changes seem greater when framed as losses rather than gains. Social dominance theory predicts that White Americans tend to view increases in equality as losses, whereas Black Americans view them as gains. In Studies 1 and 2, the authors experimentally tested whether groups judge the same change differently depending on whether it represents a loss or gain. In Studies 3-6, the authors used experimental methods to test whether White participants who frame equality-promoting changes as losses perceive greater progress toward racial equality. The authors discuss theoretical and political implications for progress toward a just society. Copyright (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16594831     DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.3.453

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  5 in total

1.  Biased hate crime perceptions can reveal supremacist sympathies.

Authors:  N Pontus Leander; Jannis Kreienkamp; Maximilian Agostini; Wolfgang Stroebe; Ernestine H Gordijn; Arie W Kruglanski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Intergroup consensus/disagreement in support of group-based hierarchy: an examination of socio-structural and psycho-cultural factors.

Authors:  I-Ching Lee; Felicia Pratto; Blair T Johnson
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Information about the US racial demographic shift triggers concerns about anti-White discrimination among the prospective White "minority".

Authors:  Maureen A Craig; Jennifer A Richeson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Ideology selectively shapes attention to inequality.

Authors:  Hannah B Waldfogel; Jennifer Sheehy-Skeffington; Oliver P Hauser; Arnold K Ho; Nour S Kteily
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Knowledge, behaviour, and policy: questioning the epistemic presuppositions of applying behavioural science in public policymaking.

Authors:  Magdalena Małecka
Journal:  Synthese       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 2.908

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.