Literature DB >> 16594311

Defining the Bobath concept using the Delphi technique.

Sue Raine1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: The Bobath concept, based on the work of Berta and Karel Bobath, offers therapists working in the field of neurological rehabilitation a framework for their clinical interventions. It is the most commonly used approach in the UK. Although they recognize that over the last half-century the concept has undergone considerable developments, proponents of the Bobath concept have been criticized for not publishing these changes. The aim of the present study was to use the Delphi technique to enable experts in the field to define the current Bobath concept.
METHOD: A four-round Delphi study design was used. The sample included all members of the British Bobath Tutor's Association, who are considered experts in the field. Initial statements were identified from the literature, with respondents generating additional statements during the study. The level of agreement was determined using a five-point Likert scale. The respondents were then provided with feedback on group opinions and given an opportunity to re-rate each statement. The level of group consensus was set at 80%.
RESULTS: Fifteen experts took part. The response rate was 85% in the first round, and 93% in each subsequent round. Ten statements from the literature were rated with a further 12 generated by the experts. Thirteen statements achieved consensus for agreement and seven for disagreement.
CONCLUSIONS: The Delphi study was an effective research tool, maintaining anonymity of responses and exploring expert opinions on the Bobath concept. The experts stated that Bobath's work has been misunderstood if it is considered as the inhibition of spasticity and the facilitation of normal movement, as described in some literature. They agreed that the Bobath concept was developed by the Bobaths as a living concept, understanding that as therapists' knowledge base grows their view of treatment broadens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16594311     DOI: 10.1002/pri.35

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiother Res Int        ISSN: 1358-2267


  5 in total

1.  When will the evidence catch up with clinical practice?

Authors:  Cheryl A Cott; Julie Vaughan Graham; Karen Brunton
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 1.037

2.  Naturopathic Oncology Modified Delphi Panel.

Authors:  Jacob Hill; Wendy Hodsdon; Jacob Schor; Neil McKinney; Daniel Rubin; Dugald Seely; Gurdev Parmar; Tim Birdsall; Lise Alschuler; Davis Lamson; Shauna Birdsall; Heather Zwickey
Journal:  Integr Cancer Ther       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 3.279

3.  Conceptualisation and development of the arm activity measure (ArmA) for assessment of activity in the hemiparetic arm.

Authors:  Stephen Ashford; Mike Slade; Lynne Turner-Stokes
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 3.033

4.  Curriculum framework for advanced practice nursing in sub-Saharan Africa: a multimethod study.

Authors:  Christmal Dela Christmals; Susan J Armstrong
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Development of a scale to measure the psychological resources of grit in adults.

Authors:  Sarah E Schimschal; Denis Visentin; Rachel Kornhaber; Tony Barnett; Michelle Cleary
Journal:  Nurs Health Sci       Date:  2022-08-14       Impact factor: 2.214

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.