Literature DB >> 16585170

Combined array-comparative genomic hybridization and single-nucleotide polymorphism-loss of heterozygosity analysis reveals complex changes and multiple forms of chromosomal instability in colorectal cancers.

Michelle Gaasenbeek1, Kimberley Howarth, Andrew J Rowan, Patricia A Gorman, Angela Jones, Tracy Chaplin, Ying Liu, David Bicknell, Eleanor J Davison, Heike Fiegler, Nigel P Carter, Rebecca R Roylance, Ian P M Tomlinson.   

Abstract

Cancers with chromosomal instability (CIN) are held to be aneuploid/polyploid with multiple large-scale gains/deletions, but the processes underlying CIN are unclear and different types of CIN might exist. We investigated colorectal cancer cell lines using array-comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) for copy number changes and single-copy number polymorphism (SNP) microarrays for allelic loss (LOH). Many array-based CGH changes were not found by LOH because they did not cause true reduction-to-homozygosity. Conversely, many regions of SNP-LOH occurred in the absence of copy number change, comprising an average per cell line of 2 chromosomes with complete LOH; 1-2 terminal regions of LOH (mitotic recombination); and 1 interstitial region of LOH. SNP-LOH detected many novel changes, representing possible locations of uncharacterized tumor suppressor loci. Microsatellite unstable (MSI+) lines infrequently showed gains/deletions or whole-chromosome LOH, but their near-diploid karyotypes concealed mitotic recombination frequencies similar to those of MSI- lines. We analyzed p53 and chromosome 18q (SMAD4) in detail, including mutation screening. Almost all MSI- lines showed LOH and/or deletion of p53 and 18q; some near-triploid lines had acquired three independent changes at these loci. We found consistent results in primary colorectal cancers. Overall, the distributions of mitotic recombination and whole-chromosome LOH in the MSI- cell lines differed significantly from random, with some lines having much higher than expected levels of these changes. Moreover, lines with more LOH changes had significantly fewer copy number changes. These data suggest that CIN is not synonymous with copy number change and some cancers have a specific tendency to whole-chromosome deletion and regain or to mitotic recombination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16585170     DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-3285

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  33 in total

1.  Homozygously deleted gene DACH1 regulates tumor-initiating activity of glioma cells.

Authors:  Akira Watanabe; Hideki Ogiwara; Shogo Ehata; Akitake Mukasa; Shumpei Ishikawa; Daichi Maeda; Keisuke Ueki; Yasushi Ino; Tomoki Todo; Yasuhiro Yamada; Masashi Fukayama; Nobuhito Saito; Kohei Miyazono; Hiroyuki Aburatani
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Uniparentalism in sporadic colorectal cancer is independent of imprint status, and coordinate for chromosomes 14 and 18.

Authors:  Huferesh K Darbary; Smitha S Dutt; Sheila J Sait; Norma J Nowak; Roy E Heinaman; Daniel L Stoler; Garth R Anderson
Journal:  Cancer Genet Cytogenet       Date:  2009-03

3.  The colorectal cancer risk at 18q21 is caused by a novel variant altering SMAD7 expression.

Authors:  Alan M Pittman; Silvia Naranjo; Emily Webb; Peter Broderick; Esther H Lips; Tom van Wezel; Hans Morreau; Kate Sullivan; Sarah Fielding; Philip Twiss; Jayaram Vijayakrishnan; Fernando Casares; Mobshra Qureshi; José Luis Gómez-Skarmeta; Richard S Houlston
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 4.  Implementing prognostic and predictive biomarkers in CRC clinical trials.

Authors:  Sandra Van Schaeybroeck; Wendy L Allen; Richard C Turkington; Patrick G Johnston
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 66.675

5.  Single nucleotide polymorphism array analysis of microsatellite-stable, diploid/near-diploid colorectal carcinomas without the CpG island methylator phenotype.

Authors:  Michael Linnebacher; Christiane Ostwald; Dirk Koczan; Tareq Salem; Björn Schneider; Mathias Krohn; Mathias Ernst; Friedrich Prall
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 2.967

6.  Genomic instability and carcinogenesis: an update.

Authors:  Wael M Abdel-Rahman
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.236

7.  CpG island methylator phenotype associates with low-degree chromosomal abnormalities in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Yu-Wei Cheng; Hanna Pincas; Manny D Bacolod; Gunter Schemmann; Sarah F Giardina; Jianmin Huang; Sandra Barral; Kamran Idrees; Sajid A Khan; Zhaoshi Zeng; Shoshana Rosenberg; Daniel A Notterman; Jurg Ott; Philip Paty; Francis Barany
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Chromosomal lesions and uniparental disomy detected by SNP arrays in MDS, MDS/MPD, and MDS-derived AML.

Authors:  Lukasz P Gondek; Ramon Tiu; Christine L O'Keefe; Mikkael A Sekeres; Karl S Theil; Jaroslaw P Maciejewski
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  The pitfalls of platform comparison: DNA copy number array technologies assessed.

Authors:  Christina Curtis; Andy G Lynch; Mark J Dunning; Inmaculada Spiteri; John C Marioni; James Hadfield; Suet-Feung Chin; James D Brenton; Simon Tavaré; Carlos Caldas
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  SNP arrays in heterogeneous tissue: highly accurate collection of both germline and somatic genetic information from unpaired single tumor samples.

Authors:  Guillaume Assié; Thomas LaFramboise; Petra Platzer; Jérôme Bertherat; Constantine A Stratakis; Charis Eng
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 11.025

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.